Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The fear of Joe Schmidt

Paul O’Connell’s famous ‘fear of God speech’ from 2007 may be a distant memory, but a fear still permeates the Irish rugby dressing room.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whisper it just in case he hears, but the Irish players are afraid of Joe Schmidt. Sean Cronin described it diplomatically as a ‘motivational fear’, but speaking with current and former players on and off the record, it’s quite clear that the former schoolteacher evokes a sense of trepidation amongst his troops.

When answering a question about his coach today, Cronin gave an insight into the environment Schmidt has created in the Ireland camp:

When you do make a mistake in a game, you’re already thinking about the review on Monday morning. There’s not many coaches that can put that kind of motivational fear into you. He’s obviously top quality.

It’s by no means a criticism, and based on his results, Schmidt is undoubtedly one of the best coaches in world rugby. 3 Six Nations Championships in five years with Ireland as well as 2 European Champions Cups and a Challenge cup with Leinster, speaks for itself. A Grand Slam on Saturday will cement his position as Ireland’s greatest ever coach.

Schmidt’s attention to detail has been well publicised by his players, but over time, tales of his temper and ability to wilt grown men in a review session or on the training pitch have slowly emerged.

One former Irish player, who shall remain nameless in the hope of someday getting back into the green jersey, described how Schmidt confronted him in front of a packed petrol station over his decision to leave Ireland for an opportunity abroad. He claims to still live in fear of Schmidt turning up on his doorstep should he step out of line and reveal any secrets.

ADVERTISEMENT

Other anecdotal stories include Schmidt flying off the handle when a certain player revealed details of Ireland’s tactics during a media interview.

From afar, it’s quite amusing and impressive to think that a coach can have that kind of effect on 50 odd grown men. It’s a testament to his character and the respect that the players must ultimately hold for Schmidt. He does in fairness also have a major impact on their livelihood and potential future earnings, but other coaches, such as Michael Cheika in Australia, have tried and failed to implement the same kind of environment.

The behind the scenes stories will slowly emerge as players retire, are spurned, or move on to pastures new, and we look forward to the many page-turners in the biographies and stories at after dinner speeches.

Apparently Schmidt reads everything in the media, so Joe, if you’re reading this, the author is under an alias, so you’ll never find me.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 2 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Smith generally isn't well connected to his forward pods; doesn't do a great job of distributing to those around him; and has inferior positional and contestable kicking games than Ford and Fin.


When England have had success over the past few years, its been either through (i) defensive rugby backed up with smart tactical kicking or (ii) high possession attacking phase play based on quick ruck ball. George Ford was key to the implementation of (i) in the RWC, and in the 6N win over Wales, and to the implementation of (ii) in the 6N games against Ireland and France. Smith did great at (ii) when running at tired defenders at the end of the Ireland match, but has never successfully implemented that gameplan from the start of a test because he doesn't distribute or support his forwards enough to create consistent fast ball and build attacks over multiple phases. Instead, his introduction to the starting side has resulted in much more playmaking responsibilities being forced onto whoever plays 9. Alex Mitchell copes ok with that, but I think he looks better with a more involved playmaking 10 outside him, and it really isn't a gameplan that works for JVP or Spencer. As a result of that the outside backs and centres have barely touched the ball when Smith has been at 10.


This might not have been too much of a disaster, as England have seemed to be moving slightly towards the sort of attacking gameplan that France played under Labit and Quins play (I think this was especially their approach when they won the league a few years ago - but its still a part of their play now), which is based on kicking to create broken field rugby. This is (i) a sharp departure from the gameplans that have worked for England in the past few seasons; (ii) bears very little relation to the tactical approaches of the non-Quins players in the England team; and (iii) is an absolute disaster for the blitz defence, which is weak in transition. Unsurprisingly, it has coincided with a sharp decline in England's results.

68 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search