Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Felix Lambey the big omission as France unveil World Cup squad

Romain Ntamack, Guilhem Guirado and Antoine Dupont.

France head coach Jacques Brunel has named his 31-man squad to travel to Japan to challenge for the World Cup and there are a few surprise omissions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Les Bleus have been carrying a 37-man squad for the recent World Cup warm-up matches against Scotland and Italy. Six of those players have now been culled for the narrowed-down squad.

The squad is:

Forwards: Jefferson Poirot, Rabah Slimani, Demba Bamba, Emerick Setiano, Cyril Baille, Guilhem Guirado (captain), Camille Chat, Peato Mauvaka, Sebastien Vahaamahina, Paul Gabrillagues, Arthur Iturria, Bernard Le Roux, Gregory Alldritt, Charles Ollivon, Louis Picamoles, Yacouba Camara, Wenceslas Lauret.

Backs: Antoine Dupont, Baptiste Serin, Maxime Machenaud, Camille Lopez, Romain Ntamack, Gael Fickou, Wesley Fofana, Sofiane Guitoune, Virimi Vakatawa, Yoann Huget, Alivereti Raka, Damian Penaud, Maxime Medard, Thomas Ramos.

Anthony Belleau, Vincent Rattez, Dany Priso, Romain Taofifenua, François Cros and Félix Lambey have all had their World Cup dreams cut short after the latest team announcement.

Whilst some of the omissions shouldn’t shock anyone – Belleau and Rattez didn’t feature at all in France’s three warm-ups to date – some will come as a bit of a surprise.

Priso was competing with Cyril Baille for a spot in the team in the front row but the slightly more experienced prop looks to have secured the role. Baille looked hungry off the bench in his two opportunities in the recent tests.

ADVERTISEMENT

Second-rowers Taofifenua and Lambey have missed on selection to the likes of specialists Paul Gabrillagues and Sébastien Vahaamahina as well as utility forward Arthur Iturria.

Lambey’s absence is a big surprise given how influential the Lyon lock was during the Six Nations earlier this year. There’s also the small issue of Gabrillagues’ three-week ban (reduced from the six weeks initially handed out) which will see him miss France’s opening match of the World Cup, against Argentina.

Brunel will evidently be relying on his locks to shoulder a heavy load throughout the World Cup, where they are placed in the ‘Pool of Death’ with Argentina and England.

Les Bleus were poor in this year’s Six Nations competition, finishing with wins over Scotland and Italy but losing their remaining three matches against teams which will mount serious challenges for the World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1mzu0RIuxw/

Still, France always tend to show up at World Cups and have made the second-equal most semi-final appearances, alongside Australia, with six to their name. Only three-time champions New Zealand have managed seven semi-final appearances from eight tournaments to date.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search