Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Fiji coach eager to develop Richie Mo’unga’s nephew into ‘world-class’ 10

Isaiah Armstrong-Ravula of Fijian Drua passes the ball during the round 12 Super Rugby Pacific match between Western Force and Fijian Drua at HBF Park, on May 11, 2024, in Perth, Australia. (Photo by Janelle St Pierre/Getty Images)

Head coach Mick Byrne believes the Flying Fijians are in a strong position to develop two young flyhalves into “world-class players” in the near future. Isaiah Armstrong-Ravula and Caleb Muntz will compete for the right to wear Fiji’s No. 10 jersey over the next month.

ADVERTISEMENT

With the Pacific Nations Cup getting underway in just over one week, the excitement and anticipation for the new-look competition is building at a rapid rate. Teams are naming training squads as they prepare for their shot at the prestigious title.

Fiji recently named a strong 30-man squad for the PNC, which includes young playmakers Armstrong-Ravula and Muntz. Armstrong-Ravula is the nephew of former All Black Richie Mo’unga, and the 20-year-old has already shown signs of promise at Test level.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

When the Flying Fijians took on the All Blacks in San Diego last month, Armstrong-Ravula was named in the starting lineup for the first time. The New Zealand-born talent played 59 minutes that night and will want to build on that in the national setup.

But it’s not exactly a given that the highly-rated prospect will wear the No. 10 on his back against Samoa and Tonga over the coming weeks. Muntz is another option who will no doubt push Armstrong-Ravula to be the best that he can be.

“(Armstrong-Ravula is) just a young player that seems to have time on his hands. He works well, he understands the game well for a young player,” Mick Byrne told reporters on Thursday.

“He’s learning as well. He’s growing in confidence, he grew through the year. I think Caleb Muntz was great support for him while Caleb was out injured. Caleb was the player in the background there for him as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He’s grown a lot during the year. He’s only under-20s – a young player – but what I like about him is the way he approaches the game. He likes to play an attacking style of rugby and so does Caleb.

“We’re very lucky. There was probably a time a couple of years ago when we were looking around for 10s and now we’ve got two world-class 10s – young 10s that we can develop into world-class players.”

Head-to-Head

Last 2 Meetings

Wins
2
Draws
0
Wins
0
Average Points scored
38
18
First try wins
100%
Home team wins
50%

Both Armstrong-Ravula and Muntz ply their trade in Super Rugby Pacific with the Fijian Drua. Muntz missed most of this year’s campaign through injury but returned in time for two regular season fixtures and the quarter-final loss to the Blues at Eden Park.

In the 24-year-old’s absence, Armstrong-Ravula took the opportunity to start with both hands during a breakout season. The young pivot made 14 appearances for the Drua and started in the No. 10 jersey in each of those fixtures.

ADVERTISEMENT

Armstrong-Ravula scored more than 100 points on the Drua’s run to the Super Rugby Pacific playoffs. But after impressing after stepping up into the Test arena, it seems entirely possible that he will get a chance in the starting side again during the PNC.

But regardless of who starts as the chief playmaker for the Flying Fijians, there’s “healthy” competition between the pair and that can only be a good thing as the team looks to build through the upcoming competition and beyond.

“They work well together and they feed off each other at training and they feed off each other off the field as well around the game,” Byrne added.

“It’s a healthy position to be in. I think the Drua are, well not lucky because they’ve worked hard to get this, the Drua have done well in securing up two great, young players and they’ll grow together.

“It gives you the ability through time to make sure both players are being looked after physically as well so it’s a very exciting combination.”

Armstrong-Ravula and Muntz are two of the 23 Fijian Drua players selected in the national squad. There are only seven players who don’t play their club rugby for the Drua who have been picked in the 30-man PNC squad.

Drua hooker Tevita Ikanivere will captain a squad that includes six uncapped players. The potential debutants are Kavaia Tagivetaua, Mesake Vocevoce, Apisalome Vota, Epeli Momo, Adrea Cocagi and Vuate Karawalevu.

Coach Byrne, who spent a few seasons with the Drua, is looking forward to the “challenge” of coaching players during an international tournament who he’s been fortunate to have worked with in the past.

“Working with players you’ve been working with for the last three years is always a good thing,” he explained. “But the players are growing every year and it’s a different opposition and it’s international rugby.

“The challenge is around setting the right plans up for the players and there’s a different gameplan. (But) having a relationship with the players definitely is a benefit.”

Fiji begin their PNC campaign against Samoa on August 23. The Fijians will also play Tonga in their only other fixture in Pool A.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 2 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

1 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 12 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search