Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Fiji player ratings vs Wales | 2024 Autumn Nation Series

Fiji's wing Jiuta Wainiqolo celebrates their win after the Autumn Nations Series International rugby union test match between Wales and Fiji at the Principality Stadium, in Cardiff on November 10, 2024. Fiji won the game 24 - 19. (Photo by Adrian Dennis / AFP) / RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE -use in books subject to Welsh Rugby Union (WRU) approval (Photo by ADRIAN DENNIS/AFP via Getty Images)

Fiji player ratings:Fiji’s performance in Cardiff was far from flawless, yet their unwavering heart and determination propelled them to a historic first Test victory at the Principality Stadium.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s how we rated the Fiji players:

1. Eroni Mawi – 7
Mawi was solid in the scrum and made a few powerful runs early on, but faded as the game wore on. Threw in a turnover for good measure as a bonus.

2. Tevita Ikanivere – 7.5
Ikanivere tackled his heart out and was busy throughout, doggedly pursuing Welsh ball carriers as if they owed him money. A few errors under pressure slightly diminished an otherwise industrious outing.

Video Spacer

Wallaby coach Joe Schmidt and leader Allan Alaalatoa Post Match Presser

Video Spacer

Wallaby coach Joe Schmidt and leader Allan Alaalatoa Post Match Presser

3. Samu Tawake – 6
Held his own in the scrum but his maul infringement that saw what would have been a critical Fiji penalty try binned off just before halftime was classic coach-killer stuff. Against that proved a nuisance at the breakdown for the Welsh.

Fixture
Internationals
Wales
19 - 24
Full-time
Fiji
All Stats and Data

4. Isoa Nasilasila – 7
A physical presence in the tight exchanges and aggressive in the breakdown. Showed good awareness and was one of the few players keeping composure under pressure.

5. Temo Mayanavanua – 7
Carried well and put in a few big tackles, but was caught out of position at times as Wales exploited gaps in Fiji’s defensive line. Workrate was admirable.

6. Meli Derenalagi – 7
An all-action display from Derenalagi, who was everywhere on the field, making tackles and winning turnovers. One of Fiji’s more consistent performers.

ADVERTISEMENT

7. Kitione Salawa – 6.5
His zeal occasionally led to overcommitment, resulting in a few missed tackles and fumbles. Overall, a strong performance with room for refinement.

8. Elia Canakaivata – 6.5
Canakaivata was deservedly yellow-carded for his role in collapsing a Welsh maul which resulted in a penalty try for the home side. Had a great PNC but this outing was a shape-learning curve.

9. Frank Lomani – 6
Lomani began with sharply enough but under increased Welsh pressure, his accuracy waned, leading to turnovers that disrupted Fiji’s momentum. Early promise was overshadowed by later inconsistencies.

10. Caleb Muntz – 9
Outstanding. His decision-making and distribution were spot-on, consistently creating from limited opportunities. His kicking game was equally impressive, keeping the scoreboard moving. A standout first-half try from the 25-year-old whets the appetite for what this guy can do.

ADVERTISEMENT

11. Semi Radradra – 2
Radradra was often called upon as a first receiver by Fiji early but, an experiment that didn’t produce much fruit.  His red card for a reckless hit on Cameron Winnett ended any chance of redemption.

12. Josua Tuisova – 8
Scary man Tuisova made numerous carries, consistently challenging the Welsh line but Wales did a decent job containing him, stifling his impact in first half. The dam burst in the second half when eventually got a one-on-one with Blair Murray and he didn’t need to be asked twice. A huge fend led to a critical Fiji penalty in the 75th minute.

Attack

180
Passes
142
130
Ball Carries
127
260m
Post Contact Metres
384m
3
Line Breaks
7

13. Waisea Nayacalevu – 8.5
After a slow start, the Sale Sharks man found his rhythm, delivering massive defensive hits that disrupted Wales’ momentum. His threat with ball in hand increased as the game wore too, even if his defensive reads fluctuated between clairvoyant and purblind.

14. Jiuta Wainiqolo – 6
Wainiqolo was looking for offloads and creating space but was more often busy than effective. Struggled under high balls and missed a couple of key tackles, giving Wales an edge in the wide channels.

15. Vuate Karawalevu – 7
Getting skinned by Blair Murray for Wales’ first try was a bad start and he had a few shaky moments under the high ball, his positional play leaving space for Wales to exploit. Showed plenty of attacking flair though and but for a forward pass would have scored the match-winner in the 73rd minute.

REPLACEMENTS

16. Sam Matavesi – 6.5
Made an impact off the bench, solid in the set-piece and eager in open play.

17. Haereiti Hetet – 5
Came on at 60 minutes but struggled to make a significant impact in the scrums and around the park.

18. Jone Koroiduadua – 6
Provided some fresh energy in the scrum and looked to get involved around the fringes.

19. Mesake Vocevoce – 6
Limited time on the field and wasn’t able to influence the game as much as he would have liked. Contributed to the defensive effort, especially at the breakdown.

20. Albert Tuisue – 6
Added some physicality off the bench. Showed intent on both sides of the ball but had limited opportunities to impact the game in open play.

21. Simione Kuruvoli – 7
Brought a real spark and threat when he came on.

22. Isaiah Armstrong-Ravula – N/A

23. Sireli Maqala – 7
Added some dynamism in attack and was a handful for the Welsh defence in his brief appearance.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search