Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Ugly controversy' rolls on as former Fiji PM fires off

(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

The row over Francis Kean’s failed bid to join the World Rugby executive committee continues in Fiji with former prime minister Sitiveni Rabuka demanding to know why the country’s rugby brand had been damaged by the “ugly controversy”. Rabuka, now Fiji’s opposition leader, questioned whether the Fiji Rugby Union board had met and discussed Kean’s nomination which was withdrawn in the face of media revelations about his conviction for manslaughter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rabuka issued a statement carried in the Fiji Times saying: “This ugly controversy cast a negative image of Fiji Rugby and our rugby “brand”, which hundreds of players and officials have worked hard to build over many decades. I believe many other deserving candidates should have been tabled and considered by the FRU board before this nomination was made.

“As a former national rugby representative and Fiji Rugby Union trustee, I’ve always been proud of our rugby union body and our national teams. The sportsmanship of our national teams make them exemplary ambassadors for Fiji. Therefore, I was very disappointed to learn of the controversy caused and an investigation into the current president of the Fiji Rugby Union (FRU) and Francis B Kean, by World Rugby.

Video Spacer

The Southern Hemisphere draw of the RugbyPass FIFA Pros

Video Spacer

The Southern Hemisphere draw of the RugbyPass FIFA Pros

“Kean has been nominated by the French Rugby Union Body for election to the World Rugby Executive Committee. Since then World Rugby has received complaints alleging homophobia and discrimination. A statement from World Rugby confirms “rugby is a sport built on strong and inclusive values and the organisation does not in any way condone abusive or discriminatory behaviour.”

FRU Chief Executive Officer, John O’Connor opted to praise Kean in SunSport despite the controversy and said: “Earning a seat on the World Rugby Council has not been easy and through Commander Kean’s visionary, sound and assertive leadership since 2015 we have managed to achieve this goal. This in itself has been a milestone achievement for Fiji Rugby, something all Fijians should be proud of.

“We respect the decision taken by our Chairman and we also thank the French Rugby Union (FFR) for supporting our nomination.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What is the future of rugby in 2025? What is the future of rugby in 2025?
Search