Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

USA's hot start fizzles out against final-bound Fiji in Tokyo

Elia Canakaivata of Fiji scores. Photo by Koki Nagahama/Getty Images

Fiji and the USA opened the 2024 Pacific Nations Cup semi-finals in Tokyo with flare and physicality, treating supporters to 80 minutes of a tussle tighter than many may have expected. Ultimately though, Fiji emerged as 22-3 victors.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was the USA who came out of the gates hot in Tokyo, pressuring Fiji and forcing errors. The Fijians didn’t help themselves with both discipline and handling issues early, and despite an overpowering scrum, Mick Byrne’s team struggled to wrestle momentum away from the Americans.

The Eagles made their opponents pay for their indiscretions once in strong field position early, claiming the opening points of the game and almost doubling their score 10 minutes later, but the attempt went wide.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Fiji’s scrummaging and the hard carries of Elia Canakaivata helped slow the USA’s roll, and 20 minutes into the contest Caleb Muntz made the most of his pack’s set-piece dominance and nailed a penalty from 40 metres out.

Three minutes later Fiji got their game rolling in tight and Muntz was helped over the line by his forward pack, going on to convert his own try.

When the USA won back possession they hit the ball with pace and plenty of attacking ambition, but Fiji’s defensive screws tightened and sent their opponents backwards after another rapid multi-phase attack.

The dual playmaking of Muntz and Isaiah Armstrong-Ravula showed flashes against a staunch American defence, with Frank Lomani able to swing play either way and find a first receiver ready to pull the strings.

ADVERTISEMENT

Handling errors continued to plague Fiji and gave the USA attacking opportunities, but as the half wore on, converting those opportunities into points looked less and less likely thanks to strong defence. Halftime score: 10-3.

22m Entries

Avg. Points Scored
1.7
11
Entries
Avg. Points Scored
0.4
7
Entries

Fiji set up camp in the USA’s 22 shortly after the second period began, but were rejected time and time again by the resolute American defence both in the maul and in open play.

A poor clearance from the USA allowed their opponents to go again, and this time the ball was put through the hands and it was Vuate Karawalevu who made the break before finding Lomani who put his No. 8 away for the try. Muntz landed the conversion from out wide.

A yellow card to Tevita Ikanivere minutes later for a dangerous clear-out looked to stop the Fijian momentum in its tracks, before the USA almost struck back through Kapeli Pifeleti but the play was called back for a forward pass.

ADVERTISEMENT

Just moments later Fiji were making a break down the left flank before Muntz put Karawalevu through another hole resulting in prop Peni Ravai sprinting down the right wing, only to fall over without an American player in sight. The prop’s tumble wouldn’t stop the Fijian try though as he popped the ball off the ground and Lomani scored in the corner.

The Fijian hits were taking a toll on the Americans and the heat didn’t help. However, in the battle of the reserves, the Americans were able to overpower the Fijian scrum.

Despite earning a chance at five points five metres from Fiji’s line and attacking off the back of another strong scrum, a handling error saw the USA’s opportunity go begging and their chance at a comeback slip through the cracks.

The game’s pace slowed as the clock wound down, seeing Fiji home with the 22-3 victory. They will face the winner of Sunday’s semi-final between Samoa and Japan in next week’s final.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

286 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search