Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Fijian Drua name pair of U20 playmakers to start against Blues

Isaiah Armstrong-Ravula of the Fijian Drua in pre-season action. Photo by Daniel Pockett/Getty Images

The Fijian Drua have backed two rookie playmakers in their first starting XV of the 2024 Super Rugby Pacific season, a game where they’ll take on the Blues in Whangarei.

ADVERTISEMENT

Starting at 10, the team named Isaiah Armstrong-Ravula, born in 2004, while fullback Isikeli Rabitu was born in 2005 and is still eligible for Fiji U20 duties.

The pair will gain valuable experience while first-choice playmaker Caleb Muntz continues to rehab the knee injury that ruled him out of the 2023 Rugby World Cup.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Coming off a quarter-final appearance in last year’s competition as well as a top-eight finish at the recent World Cup, Drua captain Meli Derenalagi told RugbyPass last week that his team will enter the 2024 campaign with confidence and energised from the experience of the past 12 months.

The 18 Drua players involved in the World Cup campaign will complement the youth of the rookies, with international veteran Mesake Doge the team’s only player over the age of 30.

Frank Lomani will help the youngsters steer the ship from halfback, while Apisalome Vota and Iosefo Masi will operate in the midfield. Selestino Ravutaumada and Epili Momo provide finishing power on the wings.

Related

Kemu Valentini offers a more experienced playmaker option off the bench, having made a name for himself as a clutch kicker in 2023.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fijian Drua team to face the Blues:

  1. Livai Natave
  2. Tevita Ikanivere
  3. Mesake Doge
  4. Isoa Nasilasila
  5. Leone Rotuisolia
  6. Etonia Waqa
  7. Ella Canakaivata
  8. Meli Derenalagi (c)
  9. Frank Lomani
  10. Isaiah Armstrong-Ravula
  11. Selestino Ravutaumada
  12. Apisalome Vota
  13. Iosefo Masi
  14. Epeli Momo
  15. Isikeli Rabitu

Replacements: Mesulame Dolokoto, Emosi Tuqiri, Jone Koroiduadua, Mesake Vocevoce, Vilive Miramira, Peni Matawalu, Kemu Valetini, Tudraki Samusamuvodre

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 35 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW
Search