Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Finn Russell's dad wins case against Scottish Rugby Union

Russell has dazzled for Scotland in the past year.

The father of Scotland star Finn Russell has won an unfair dismissal case that he brought against the Scottish Rugby Union (SRU) it is being reported.

ADVERTISEMENT

Keith Russell successfully brought legal proceeding against the SRU after he was dismissed from his position as Director of Domestic Rugby.

Having been appointed in the role in 2015, Russell was dismissed from the role in 2017, a dismissal that has now found to be “both procedurally and substantively unfair”.

According The Offside Line website Russell was offered a settlement by the SRU, which he refused in favour of pursuing an unfair dismissal claim against his former employers.

In an interview with the The Offside Line Russell said he wanted the manner in which the SRU treat employees to be made public and for the organisation to effectively mend its ways.

He says he had been forwarned before joining the organisation.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

“Everyone I spoke to in different agencies told me it was a bit of a nightmare organisation. I was kind of aware of that. But I thought I’d changed dramatically what happens in Stirling [local authority], changed dramatically what happens in Glasgow, so here’s another 10 years to make a difference.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Russell says that after two years on the job that he was called to a meeting in early 2017 in which he was shocked to be told by SRU Chief Executive Mark Dodson that if he ‘wished to move’ on that he could ‘write him a cheque’ now.

A second meeting was held on 19th May – four months later – in which Russell was summarily dismissed. He was not afforded an opportunity to mount a defence to his sacking. The SRU cited that there had not been sufficient progress.

The judge presiding over the case this week found in favour of Russell, saying that the SRU evidence regarding Russell’s inability to do his job was largely based on opinion and not fact.

“On the evidence presented I was unable to find in fact that the respondent employer honestly and reasonably held belief that the claimant was not competent nor, and equally importantly, that there was a reasonable ground for that belief as at the time of dismissal.”

Regarding Russell’s evidence the Judge said: “I found the claimant’s evidence to be both credible and reliable.”

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the BBC, the SRU stated following in relation to the decision: “Scottish Rugby acknowledges the outcome of the tribunal and, while there are some areas of the ruling it disagrees with, there will not be an appeal.

“We will now be reviewing the judgement in detail and working with Mr Russell to conclude the process.

“Scottish Rugby stands by its decision to change the leadership of the domestic rugby department given the fundamental importance this area of the sport plays in all aspects of game in Scotland.”

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Kieran Read names his 2025 British and Irish Lions captain Kieran Read names his 2025 British and Irish Lions captain
Search