Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Fishing for Big Vern: The tactics of Eddie Jones' post-match interview

Eddie Jones (Photo: Getty Images)

Another game, another show-stealing post-match performance from England’s master tactician, writes Scotty Stevenson.

ADVERTISEMENT

No one should be surprised at all by England coach Eddie Jones’ farcical comments following his side’s 36-15 defeat of Italy at Twickenham on Sunday, but in the rush to understand those comments, and Italy’s expert use of rugby’s idiosyncratic ruck laws, you could be forgiven for having missed Jones using his platform to do what he does best: take a crack at his next opponent.

It was buried somewhere in the stinking pile of gracelessness that constituted his post-match interview, but it was most certainly there – a now-typical Eddie Jones dagger thrust, this time aimed at the chest (give him that at least) of Scotland and their coach Vern Cotter.

By now we all know that Jones didn’t consider the Italian match a game of rugby, going so far as to suggest the team may have to go back onto the pitch for a training run so the spectators could be entertained. “It’s hard when you don’t play rugby,” Jones offered as a response to why his team had taken so long to react and then to nullify the Italian tactics.

Surely it is sheer lunacy to claim an international team of England’s calibre didn’t understand the laws of the game. However, when you consider referee Romain Poite gave the same ‘tackle only’ message to England’s defence at least three times in the first 15 minutes of the match and yet they did not once leave their line to take advantage of the regulation, it may not be as crazy as it sounds.

Never fear. Having left a burley trail of throw-downs on the Italians, World Rugby, and the referee, Jones was quick to cast his line into the churning, unpredictable waters of the upcoming fortnight and wait for someone to take the bait. Of course, the prize fish was Vern Cotter, whose Scottish side, according to Jones, would never dare be so bold as to make it hard for England’s attack line to spark itself into action. “I’m sure they are going to play proper rugby,” said the England coach, quoting from the endlessly entertaining Gospel of Eddie.

There was more to it, though, as there always is behind the perma-smile and the bespoke cloak of self-assuredness that have elevated Jones from international rugby coach to international rugby iconoclast.

ADVERTISEMENT

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1485479950″]

“We’ve got Scotland in two weeks which is going to be fantastic because they’re already talking it up,” he told the BBC, without feeling the need to clarify who ‘they’ actually are, presumably because that hardly matters these days. It was as calculated a line as Jones has yet delivered, but done so with the trademark brio that, depending on your disposition, is either exceedingly endearing or as infuriating as a joke without a punchline.

He continued: “You know they’ve got belief, they’ve got confidence. Confidence leads to better performances, better performances lead to high expectation, and now they have to carry around the burden of Scotland’s expectations for the next two weeks.” Holy shit! Did Jones just troll Scotland with a corporate monologue from a discarded The Office scene? Yes he damn well did. Did he also just use the words ‘burden ‘, ‘expectations’ and ‘Scotland’ in the same sentence?

No one in Scotland will be taking Jones’ comments seriously, least of all Vern Cotter who, according to Jones “won’t have the same tactics that were here. He’s a New Zealand guy. They like the breakdown. They like the contact.”

Well, yes, Jones would love Scotland to roll into Twickenham and engage in the rugby equivalent of a pint-throwing pub fight. The England side has shown in this tournament that its close-in defence is the best in the competition with Maro Itoje and Courtney Lawes leading the way, and the rotating opensiders offering staunch assistance. Scotland should not be conned into close quarter battle.

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead, if the Scots are serious about taking the Calcutta Cup back to Murrayfield, they would be better advised to play the craziest brand of rugby they can conjure – with flair, blatant disregard for the opposition, and cold-blooded ruthlessness. Sort of like an Eddie Jones post-match interview, but minus the sanctimony.

Not that they need any advice from this columnist. They’ll already be getting enough of that over the next couple of weeks. And no prizes for guessing from whom it will be coming.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 16 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Well I was mainly referring to my thinking about the split, which was essentially each /3 rounded up, but reliant on WCs to add buffer.


You may have been going for just a 16 team league ranking cup?


But yes, those were just ideas for how to select WCs, all very arbitrary but I think more interesting in ways than just going down a list (say like fl's) of who is next in line. Indeed in my reply to you I hinted at say the 'URC' WC spot actually being given to the Ireland pool and taken away from the Welsh pool.


It's easy to think that is excluding, and making it even harder on, a poor performing country, but this is all in context of a 18 or 20 team comp where URC (at least to those teams in the URC) got 6 places, which Wales has one side lingering around, and you'd expect should make. Imagine the spice in that 6N game with Italy, or any other of the URC members though! Everyone talks about SA joining the 6N, so not sure it will be a problem, but it would be a fairly minor one imo.


But that's a structure of the leagues were instead of thinking how to get in at the top, I started from the bottom and thought that it best those teams doing qualify for anything. Then I thought the two comps should be identical in structure. So that's were an even split comes in with creating numbers, and the 'UEFA' model you suggest using in some manner, I thought could be used for the WC's (5 in my 20 team comp) instead of those ideas of mine you pointed out.


I see Jones has waded in like his normal self when it comes to SH teams. One thing I really like about his idea is the name change to the two competitions, to Cup and Shield. Oh, and home and away matches.

41 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Yes I was the one who suggested to use a UEFA style point. And I guessed, that based on the last 5 years we should start with 6 top14, 6 URC and 4 Prem."

Yes I am aware that you suggested it, but you then went on to say that we should initially start with a balance that clearly wasn't derived from that system. I'm not a mind reader, so how was I to work out that you'd arrived at that balance by dint of completely having failed to remember the history of the competition.


"Again, I was the one suggesting that, but you didn't like the outcome of that."

I have no issues with the outcome of that, I had an issue with a completely random allocation of teams that you plucked out of thin air.

Interestingly its you who now seem to be renouncing the UEFA style points system, because you don't like the outcome of reducing URC representation.


"4 teams for Top14, URC and Prem, 3 teams for other leagues and the last winner, what do you think?"

What about 4 each + 4 to the best performing teams in last years competition not to have otherwise qualified? Or what about a UEFA style system where places are allocated to leagues on the basis of their performance in previous years' competitions?

There's no point including Black Lion if they're just going to get whitewashed every year, which I think would be a possibility. At most I'd support 1 team from the Rugby Europe Super Cup, or the Russian Championship being included. Maybe the best placed non-Israeli team and the Russian winners could play off every year for the spot? But honestly I think its best if they stay limited to the Challenge Cup for now.

41 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ian Foster: 'You kid yourself that we were robbed' Ian Foster: 'You kid yourself that we were robbed'
Search