Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Fit-again England skipper Farrell enjoys a winning Saracens return

By PA
(Photo by PA)

Max Malins scored two tries as Saracens won their third game in a row in the Gallagher Premiership by narrowly defeating Bristol Bears 27-23 at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium. The first rugby game at the venue was also the first game in four months after injuries to both ankles for Saracens and England captain Owen Farrell and he kicked twelve points before being forced off with a knock to the head after 70 minutes.

ADVERTISEMENT

The result did not come without a dramatic finish, however, as Bristol winger Jack Bates had what seemed a winning try disallowed in the dying stages. Bristol opened the scoring with just over three minutes gone when the forwards moved them to within metres of the line before Harry Randall’s pass allowed Antoine Frisch to charge through the middle to score.

Tiff Eden’s conversion was simple, but Saracens soon levelled, with a long pass by Farrell bouncing nicely for Ben Earl, who then sent Malins clear to score in the corner, with Farrell converting superbly from the touchline.

Video Spacer

RFU Belonging – Back in the Game

Video Spacer

RFU Belonging – Back in the Game

The Bears then went ahead for a second time after an overthrown Sarries line-out when Eden’s lovely offload put Frisch into space and his pass sent Piers O’Conor scampering away down the left. Farrell then nudged Sarries ahead with two penalties in the space of five minutes, but Eden quickly ensured the Bears regained their advantage again with a kick of his own.

That lead was extended in the 37th minute when Eden gathered an overthrown Bristol line-out and send Frisch on a run that took him to within a metre of the line, with Eden following up to score off his offload.

Related

Eden could not convert, however, and this proved important as Saracens levelled off the final play of a terrific first half. The ball went through the hands of Farrell and Alex Goode before Alex Lozowski burst away down the left before timing his pass to allow Elliot Daly to jink past the last defender, and Farrell converted well again.

That left things tied at 20-20 at half-time, but it did not take Saracens long to hit the front after the restart as Goode passed to Malins and the winger shrugged off an attempted tackle to score his second try.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sarries thought they had their bonus-point score when Nick Tompkins went through from Farrell’s offload but the ‘try’ was ruled out by a Billy Vunipola knock-on in the build-up. Replacement fly-half Callum Sheedy then pulled Bristol back to within four points with a penalty, following Farrell’s no-arms tackle on O’Conor.

The Bears looked to have snatched victory in the last minute when captain Joe Joyce went on a fantastic run before putting Bates in the clear, but the pass to him went forward and Saracens held on, just.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search