Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Fit-again Smith named for Six Nations dress rehearsal versus Russell

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

England out-half Marcus Smith is set to play his first rugby in seven weeks after being chosen to start for Harlequins this Sunday at Racing 92, the day before new Test-level boss Steve Borthwick names his Guinness Six Nations squad. The half-back limped off injured at Twickenham in the November 26 England defeat versus the Springboks, Eddie Jones’ last match in charge before his dismissal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Smith has since taken his time to mend, but his return to action will be very timely given that his rivals for the No10 England jersey, Owen Farrell and George Ford, are both currently sidelined through respective suspension and injury issues.

Farrell was banned in midweek for last weekend’s foul play tackle for Saracens versus Gloucester in the Gallagher Premiership while Ford has yet to debut for Sale following his Twickenham injury with Leicester in last June’s league final.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

With Farrell having copped a four-game ban (that can be reduced to three if he successfully completes tackle school to free him to face the Scots) and Ford’s potential return-to-play date for the Sharks being January 27, eight days before England are due to open their latest campaign at home to Scotland, the return of Smith with Harlequins is a major boost for Borthwick in a week in which Nick Evans, Smith’s club coach, was named attack coach for the Six Nations.

Smith has been included in a Harlequins XV that will also have the recently suspended Joe Marler starting. The loosehead, who is also looking for England squad selection, was banned for two matches for his December 27 verbal attack on Bristol’s Jake Heenan.

Related

Smith’s appearance versus Racing will potentially be a Six Nations dress rehearsal as his opposite number in the Champions Cup round three match is Scotland’s Finn Russell. Harlequins boss Tabai Matson said: “It’s great to welcome back so many players to the matchday squad after spells away from the team.

“Our club captain Stephan Lewies and Aaron Morris, in particular, have had to display plenty of patience in their returns to fitness and have worked incredibly hard to get back for this match. It’s a huge boost to also welcome Marcus Smith and Will Evans back this week. They are two guys that make a huge difference when they are on the pitch.”

ADVERTISEMENT

RACING 92: 15. Warrick Gelant; 14. Donovan Taofifenua, 13. Francis Saili, 12. Gael Fickou (capt), 11. Juan Imhoff; 10. Finn Russell, 9. Nolann Le Garrec; 1. Guram Gogichashvili, 2. Camille Chat, 3. Cedate Gomes Sa, 4. Cameron Woki, 5. Boris Palu, 6. Ibrahim Diallo, 7. Baptiste Chouzenoux, 8. Maxime Baudonne. Reps: 16. Peniami Narisia, 17. Eddy Ben Arous, 18. Trevor Nyakane, 19. Anthime Hemery, 20. Kitione Kamikamica, 21. Antoine Gibert, 22. Olivier Klemenczak, 23. Max Spring.

HARLEQUINS: 15. Nick David; 14. Cadan Murley, 13. Joe Marchant, 12. Andre Esterhuizen, 11. Aaron Morris; 10. Marcus Smith, 9. Danny Care; 1. Joe Marler, 2. Jack Walker, 3. Wilco Louw, 4. Stephan Lewies, 5. Irne Herbst, 6. Luke Wallace, 7. Will Evans, 8. Alex Dombrandt (capt). Reps: 16. George Head, 17. Jordan Els, 18. Simon Kerrod, 19. George Hammond, 20. Tom Lawday, 21. Lewis Gjaltema, 22. Oscar Beard 23. Will Edwards.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search