Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Five things we learned from the Lions' second-Test

By PA
Mako Vunipola /PA

The British and Irish Lions’ second-half capitulation against South Africa on Saturday has set up a tense decisive third Test next weekend. Here, PA examines the talking points from the Boks’ supreme 27-9 victory in Cape Town.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rassie Erasmus’ social media rant worked wonders
Rugby director Erasmus might find himself in hot water with the sport’s governors, but South Africa will not care one jot after Saturday’s potent second-Test victory. The Boks boss’ 62-minute social media rant against the officiating from the Lions’ 22-17 first Test victory has, in hindsight, definitely turned the series in the hosts’ favour.

So acutely aware of outside scrutiny were the officials for Saturday’s second Test that the first half lasted more than an hour. The stop-start nature of the opening period ensured the undercooked Springboks would not run out of steam again in the closing stages, as they had in the first Test. The marginal calls fell the Boks way as well, and the home side took full advantage, battering the Lions in a fully-deserved, commanding win.

Video Spacer

Matt Dawson & Mike Brown Quiz 2

Video Spacer

Matt Dawson & Mike Brown Quiz 2

A busy few days await the citing commissioners
All the off-field squabbling between the two camps was bound to boil over on Saturday, and so it proved. Cheslin Kolbe was lucky to avoid a red card for tackling Conor Murray in the air, while Faf De Klerk’s high shot on Murray was not even considered problematic.

The Lions were no choirboys either however, with full-back Stuart Hogg forced to issue a statement strenuously denying allegations of biting. Maro Itoje was caught on camera holding his knee to the neck and chest area of a prone Damian De Allende to boot, as tensions continued to build in this engaging but niggly series.

Test rugby has a major entertainment problem
Rugby is desperate to grow the game globally, and sell the sport to new territories and groups of potential fans. But any newcomer tuning in to Saturday’s transmission would have been left underwhelmed by the turgidity of a dismal first-half.

When even die-hard aficionados are reaching for the off button, the spectacle has long evaporated. Referees and officials have an extremely testing job making the right calls when many of the rules remain open to interpretation, and the lawmakers would do well to remove much of that subjectivity for Test match rugby’s long-term good.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Lions must regain composure to stand a chance of a series win
When Tom Curry squared up to Kolbe after the wing had tackled Murray in the air, the Lions lost a modicum of high ground. Rather than help the officials take a dim view of Kolbe’s dangerous tackle, that aggressive move will have only left the referee and his team looking unfavourably on the tourists. Even the sideshow scuffles went South Africa’s way on Saturday, and the Lions can ill afford any further rancour.

Celebrated selector Warren Gatland must pull another masterstroke
Lions boss Gatland has never shied away from a bold move when it comes to selection. And the former Wales coach will need the strength of his convictions all over again heading into a massive week. The Lions’ back-three failed to cope with the Boks’ aerial game, and new faces could be called for there. A tactical re-jig could be required as well, as the Lions failed to create anything of note in midfield and certainly need more guile and invention.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
How the four-team format will help the Wallabies defeat the Lions

Have to imagine it was a one off sorta thing were they were there (saying playing against the best private schools) because that is the level they could play at. I think I got carried away and misintrepted what you were saying, or maybe it was just that I thought it was something that should be brought in.


Of course now school is seen as so much more important, and sports as much more important to schooling, that those rural/public gets get these scholarships/free entry to play at private schools.


This might only be relevant in the tradition private rugby schools, so not worth implementing, but the same drain has been seen in NZ to the point where the public schools are not just impacted by the lost of their best talent to private schools, there is a whole flow on effect of losing players to other sports their school can' still compete at the highest levels in, and staff quality etc. So now and of that traditional sort of rivalry is near lost as I understand it.


The idea to force the top level competition into having equal public school participation would be someway to 'force' that neglect into reverse. The problem with such a simple idea is of course that if good rugby talent decides to stay put in order to get easier exposure, they suffer academically on principle. I wonder if a kid who say got selected for a school rep 1st/2nd team before being scouted by a private school, or even just say had two or three years there, could choose to rep their old school for some of their rugby still?


Like say a new Cup style comp throughout the season, kid's playing for the private school in their own local/private school grade comp or whatever, but when its Cup games they switch back? Better represent, areas, get more 2nd players switching back for top level 1st comp at their old school etc? Just even in order to have cool stories where Ella or Barrett brothers all switch back to show their old school is actually the best of the best?

115 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Money not everything in Toulouse ‘paradise’ as rivals try to rein in champions Money not everything in Toulouse ‘paradise’ as rivals try to rein in champions
Search