Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Flashback Friday: Watch the bone-headed last play of the first ever Brumbies/Hurricanes match

It’s all about to go horribly wrong

The Hurricanes are known these days as experts at the art of the cross kick, but it wasn’t always the case. Back in 1996 the fledgling franchise was on the cusp of their first ever win, but fate intervened and gifted us with one of the most classic low-percentage plays of all time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Basically everything that could’ve possibly went wrong for the Hurricanes happened, despite them having possession and a slight territorial advantage.

Let’s just break this down:

  • Yes, that clock says there’s 30 seconds left till full-time and the score is 28-all. There are four players stacked on one side of the ruck, but halfback Rhys Duggan opts to go open where only first five Jamie Cameron and winger Alex Telea are covering half the width of the field.
  • To be fair to Duggan, while the option isn’t great, there’s nothing wrong with the pass. It goes straight through Cameron’s hands, he then inexplicably blasts a low kick straight into the only impediment that would keep the ball from flying into touch – his own team mate, Telea.
  • Telea’s shoulder couldn’t have done a better job at keeping the ball alive, it pops perfectly into the arms of Mitch Hardy. He suddenly has 40 metres of fresh air in front of him and the tryline.
  • To add insult to injury, Cameron is taken out by what looks to be Marco Caputo. The Brumbies hooker holds on just long enough for Cameron to fall flat on his face attempting to make a cover tackle. Meanwhile Telea ends up doing his best impersonation of a freshly oiled turnstile as Hardy breezes past him.
  • The Canes then get subjected to the full George Gregan treatment, with the Wallaby halfback celebrating before Hardy is even over the 22.
  • Final score: Brumbies 32 Hurricanes 25.

FULL HIGHLIGHTS:

Hurricanes fans only had to wait another week for their team’s first ever win, over the then-Transvaal Lions. It was one of only three in an otherwise modest debut season that featured the emergence of Christian Cullen as the game’s new superstar.

The Brumbies, who were written off pre season as a motley pack of rejects from the powerhouse unions of New South Wales and Queensland, managed to almost make the semi finals in 1996. They built on this momentum to become the most dominant Australian team in the competition over its history, winning two titles in six final appearances.

The two teams clash again in Canberra tonight, the same place where the comical finish of their first ever Super Rugby meeting took place.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s doubtful that the low, unexpected kick-pass that rockets off a teammate to lose the game will be in Beauden Barrett’s playbook though.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search