Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Focus now shifts to Dave Rennie and whether he will still coach the Wallabies

(Photo by Mark Evans/Getty Images)

The future of incoming Wallabies head coach Dave Rennie has become a worry for many Australian rugby fans in the wake of chief executive Raelene Castle’s resignation on Thursday. Her exit came shortly after eleven ex-Wallaby captains (although one – Michael Lynagh – rescinded his support) wrote a letter of no confidence to Rugby Australia, which proved to be the death knell for Castle’s tenure.  

ADVERTISEMENT

One of the major successes of the former Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs CEO’s time in charge was the appointment of Scott Johnson as director of rugby in 2019, as well as recruiting Rennie as head coach, who is set to take over at the end of his spell with Glasgow Warriors. 

Rennie, who is succeeding the outspoken Michael Cheika, was a candidate in his native New Zealand to take over from Steve Hansen with the All Blacks, which is a sign of his pedigree and how this was an astute move by Castle. However, his ascension to the Wallabies role has now been cast into doubt.

Video Spacer

Scott Sio of the Wallabies and the Brumbies talks lockdown life

Brumbies prop Scott Sio talks about salary cuts and other issues surrounding the COVID-19 lockdown

Video Spacer

Scott Sio of the Wallabies and the Brumbies talks lockdown life

Brumbies prop Scott Sio talks about salary cuts and other issues surrounding the COVID-19 lockdown

With so many mixed signals, it is hard to know where Australian rugby stands following a difficult period adjusting to the economic impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the sport. 

It had been widely reported over the past weeks that Rennie’s appointment was dependent on Castle remaining in her post. The outgoing CEO recently said that Rennie will become the coach regardless of her status but given the obscure nature of her departure, there is much doubt surrounding Rennie’s arrival. 

This is perhaps the most damaging thing about the entire debacle for many Australians, that the national team may potentially lose out on a coach that was chosen to revive the stuttering Wallabies. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Castle presided over a tough and divisive few years in Australian rugby, a spell defined by the Israel Folau saga as well as her decision to keep Cheika in his head coach role despite the team faltering over a long period of time. 

That is not to say there were many that supported her decisions in these cases, but they were such polarising situations that there were also swathes of people who were not happy. 

https://twitter.com/MRrugbyworldcup/status/1253276773476790272?s=20

Her popularity has slumped in recent months given the Wallabies’ dismal performance at the World Cup alongside a decline in interest in Super Rugby, culminating in the loss of a longstanding broadcasting partner. 

Now, in the aftermath of her departure, people are not only questioning whether that will bring an end to Rennie’s term in charge before it has even begun, but why the Kiwi would want the job anyway. 

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 8 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Smith generally isn't well connected to his forward pods; doesn't do a great job of distributing to those around him; and has inferior positional and contestable kicking games than Ford and Fin.


When England have had success over the past few years, its been either through (i) defensive rugby backed up with smart tactical kicking or (ii) high possession attacking phase play based on quick ruck ball. George Ford was key to the implementation of (i) in the RWC, and in the 6N win over Wales, and to the implementation of (ii) in the 6N games against Ireland and France. Smith did great at (ii) when running at tired defenders at the end of the Ireland match, but has never successfully implemented that gameplan from the start of a test because he doesn't distribute or support his forwards enough to create consistent fast ball and build attacks over multiple phases. Instead, his introduction to the starting side has resulted in much more playmaking responsibilities being forced onto whoever plays 9. Alex Mitchell copes ok with that, but I think he looks better with a more involved playmaking 10 outside him, and it really isn't a gameplan that works for JVP or Spencer. As a result of that the outside backs and centres have barely touched the ball when Smith has been at 10.


This might not have been too much of a disaster, as England have seemed to be moving slightly towards the sort of attacking gameplan that France played under Labit and Quins play (I think this was especially their approach when they won the league a few years ago - but its still a part of their play now), which is based on kicking to create broken field rugby. This is (i) a sharp departure from the gameplans that have worked for England in the past few seasons; (ii) bears very little relation to the tactical approaches of the non-Quins players in the England team; and (iii) is an absolute disaster for the blitz defence, which is weak in transition. Unsurprisingly, it has coincided with a sharp decline in England's results.

68 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search