Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

For all the tough things Scotland did right, the stupid errors will have Gregor Townsend quietly fuming

Gregor Townsend and Finn Russell. (Original photo by Andy Buchanan/AFP)

Scotland’s first win over England at Twickenham since 1983 is reason for celebration but when Gregor Townsend and his troops re-group to assess the game heading into Round 2 of the Six Nations, there will be plenty of work-ons identified.

ADVERTISEMENT

While the success should be praised, one win against England isn’t going to earn Scotland the Six Nations trophy and there will inevitably come a day where the bounce of the ball goes a different way and Scotland won’t be quite so lucky.

Yes, it’s taken almost 40 years to nab a win at Twickenham, but the victory must first be put into context.

Video Spacer

England World Cup winner Jonny Wilkinson joined Scotland head coach and former International Gregor Townsend on All Access to reflect on some of their most iconic appearances in the Calcutta Cup.

Video Spacer

England World Cup winner Jonny Wilkinson joined Scotland head coach and former International Gregor Townsend on All Access to reflect on some of their most iconic appearances in the Calcutta Cup.

Four of England’s starting team hadn’t played a game of professional rugby this year. Owen Farrell, Elliot Daly, Maro Itoje and Jamie George had been side-lined since the Autumn Nations Cup final in January and entered the fixture seriously short of match-fitness. Billy Vunipola, who played in a sole exhibition match for Saracens last month, is in a similar boat.

When players spend so long out from the game, they’ll either return to action refreshed and ready to fire, or rusty and under-prepared for the rigours of test rugby.

Argentina, in their four Tri-Nations matches last year, followed the former path. The likes of Farrell and Vunipola, on the other hand, looked like they were still on holiday when Scotland came to Twickenham.

Of course, fans were also on holiday from the venue – with the match played in front of an empty stadium. While it was technically an ‘away’ victory for Scotland, the fact that England weren’t buoyed on by their 16th man would have had a huge impact on their performance.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wins against England don’t come easily for Scotland (the last came in 2018), so of course, the victory is still an accomplishment – but it’s not quite the level of accomplishment that the 38 years between drinks would typically indicate.

Townsend would have gone into the match without caring too much for history and while the win will have put a smile on his face, he’ll be much more concerned with the here and now – and what Scotland need to do to ensure that this isn’t the high point in their Six Nations campaign.

The coach would have been pleased with how well his charges handled themselves in the match and how they stood up to their big brothers, especially when they were reduced to 14 men either side of halftime.

What Townsend won’t be happy with, however, is that while they managed to do all the difficult things very well, they sometimes did the simple things incredibly poorly.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by RugbyPass (@rugbypass)

Right from the opening whistle, Scotland found themselves under the pump due to a poor box-kicking effort from Ali Price. Parked inside the 22, the Glasgow scrumhalf punted the ball directly into Maro Itoje’s outstretched arms and suddenly Scotland had to scramble.

The charge-down wasn’t entirely Price’s fault – his forwards needed to do a much better job of obstructing Itoje’s pathway to the halfback.

Price was lucky not to be marched from the field with his team a penalty-try behind after he shoved Itoje in the back when the England lock chased the charge-down but somehow, Scotland escaped.

Not much later in the game, Price’s box kick was again blocked by Itoje’s imposing figure and Townsend would have been pulling his hair out at the repeated mistake – if he had any.

The match was all about discipline – whichever team cracked first in the latter stages of the second half was going to find themselves in a very difficult position to win the game.

Thankfully, Scotland were able to control play and not make any silly errors, seemingly having used those all up in the first half. The fact that they had to play the match with 14 men for any period would have pained the coach, given it was due to an entirely stupid attempted trip from flyhalf Finn Russell.

Still, Townsend’s men rallied and heading into the final minutes of the encounter, camped inside the England 22, it looked like the game was done and dusted.

Then Russell decided to sit back for a drop kick.

It was the kind of play that would have made sense if Scotland were sitting pretty in front of the posts, but that wasn’t the case at all.

With less than a minute left on the clock, Scotland just needed to hold onto the ball to secure the historic win, but they teed up a hail-mary play that was unlikely to succeed.

Following an unsurprising charge-down from England, Scotland were lucky to hold onto the ball and had a second opportunity to wind-down the final 30 seconds of the game but instead replacement scrumhalf Scott Steele kicked into England’s 22.

The ball rolled just a little too far, however, and England were gifted possession not far out from their own 22-metre line.

It was always going to be a tough ask for England to cart the ball back and score the try which they would have needed to win the game and, from a Scottish point of view, thankfully they weren’t able to manage it – but they never should have been afforded the opportunity.

When the pressure was on and everyone expected Scotland to falter, they stood strong. They handled the English pack, comfortably getting the advantage at the set-piece, and managed to control the flow of the game even when they were a man down.

But too often throughout the match, they didn’t get the little things right – and it’s those little things that Gregor Townsend will no doubt be addressing in the coming days.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search