Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Forget eligibility rules, Super Rugby can plug PI player drain - Dan Leo

Dan Leo in action for London Irish in 2014

World Rugby’s changes to Regulation 8 will do little to stop the plunder of the Pacific Islands’ player stocks, ex-Samoa captain Dan Leo tells James Harrington – but a Super Rugby side or two would make a big difference.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bringing Super Rugby to the Pacific Islands would do more to prevent the talent drain than increasing residency requirements to five years – and will improve the competition, former Samoa captain Dan Leo believes.

“That would definitely be part of the solution,” he said. “It would give guys a reason to stay on the Islands. At the moment we don’t have professional rugby, so there’s no reason for them to stay there.

“The Super Rugby product has dwindled in the past few years. When you look at it, they’ve watered down the product and made it such a wide competition in terms of distances involved. And in the middle of it all, the closest place to Australia and New Zealand is the Pacific Islands. We have probably the strongest talent pool, too.

“It doesn’t make sense that the Islands have been overlooked for so long. But hopefully, as mainstream media pick up on that, it will start to change.”

Leo, founder of Pacific Island Player Welfare, which raises awareness and understanding of issues faced by Islanders tempted overseas by professional contracts, fears changing residency rules could have the opposite of the desired effect. “I know the aim was to get rid of the project player scenario. But my worry is that people will head overseas a couple of years younger, so they will be eligible by the time they are 19, 20, or 21. We have to be in a place to be able to protect guys if that does start to happen.”

Pacific Islands ‘plundered’

That protection begins at home, Leo said. “There needs to be regulation around rogue agents plundering player stocks in the Pacific.

“World Rugby can change eligibility rules to five years, but that does not deal with the issue on the Islands – that there’s no professional rugby. There’s no pathway there. If anyone wants a decent education or a professional rugby career, they have got to leave.

ADVERTISEMENT

“A three-year residency or five-year residency rule does not change the fact that people want to leave because to make life better for themselves, they have to. Maybe that’s not a rugby issue. Maybe it’s a social issue, but it needs addressing.

“There are agents who are ripping off Pacific Island players. At the moment there’s no real regulation. They can go over to the Islands and pretty much do what they like. There’s a lot of money to be made from relatively cheap Island labour. When money’s involved things become very difficult.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473723684″]

Missed opportunity

“When the game went professional in 1995, something could have happened to support the Islands. Since then, though, most will agree the gap between the rugby haves and have-nots has widened.

“If World Rugby had access to what contracts were being signed, by whom and for how much; and if agents had to say how much they were charging players for their services, I think it would go a long way to fixing the problem.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Unions also have a responsibility to players brought over to play in their competitions, beyond the rarified atmosphere of top-flight rugby, Leo – who has played in France and England – said. “I had an email from the Fédération Française de Rugby (FFR) a couple of weeks ago. It said that there are 186 professional or semi-professional rugby players with Fijian passports in France alone.

“If you add Samoan and Tongans into that, I’d expect that figure to be the same again. You’re looking in the vicinity of 400 Islanders driving professional rugby in France.

Life after rugby

“At the end of those 400 guys’ careers, when they’re spat out of the other end of the game, what’s in place for them? Do they have the work experience and higher education support they need to generate an income after the game, or are they left high and dry?

“One of my fears is guys are coming out of rugby with little to show for a 10 or 12-year career, other than some good memories. I don’t think that’s good enough.

“If you’re playing top-flight rugby, chances are you’re being looked after quite well by your agent – he’s probably answering your phone calls because you’re bringing in a good pay packet, and clubs have really good support structures now thanks to switched-on team managers, and you have organisations like [player unions] the RPA in the UK and France’s Provale, but they are not being engaged by Pacific Island players – other than some of those at Top 14 and Premiership level. The guys in the lower leagues require a bit more support.”

Innocents abroad

The culture shock Pacific Island-born players face when they first move overseas may appear insurmountable. Leo said: “In a typical Samoan family, which I was brought up in, parents have total control over the finances, over everything. You’re not necessarily empowered to make life decisions until you’re 21, at least.

“In England, for example, you’re seen as an adult by the time you’re 16 or 18. In the Pacific Islands, that’s something that happens a lot later.

“For a lot of young players who move overseas, they’re going out and doing things and dealing with money for the first time in their lives. Their first rugby contract is the first time they have the responsibility to do all those things for themselves.

“It’s a very innocent upbringing for those guys on the islands and life can be very harsh outside those environments.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
Oh no, not him again? 2 hours ago
England internationals disagree on final play execution vs All Blacks

Okay, so we blew it big time on Saturday. So rather than repeating what most people have all ready said, what do I want to see from Borthwick going forward?


Let's keep Marcus Smith on the pitch if he's fit and playing well. I was really pleased with his goal kicking. It used to be his weakness. I feel sympathy for George Ford who hadn't kicked all match and then had a kick to win the game. You hear pundits and commentators commend kickers who have come off the bench and pulled that off. Its not easy. If Steve B continues to substitute players with no clear reason then he is going to get criticised.


On paper I thought England would beat NZ if they played to their potential and didn't show NZ too much respect. Okay, the off the ball tackles certainly stopped England scoring tries, but I would have liked to see more smashing over gainlines and less kicking for position. Yes, I also know it's the Springbok endorsed world cup double winning formula but the Kiwi defence isn't the Bok defence, is it. If you have the power to put Smith on the front foot then why muzzle him? I guess what I'm saying is back, yourself. Why give the momentum to a team like NZ? Why feed the beast? Don't give the ball to NZ. Well d'uh.


Our scrum is a long term weakness. If you are going to play Itoje then he needs an ogre next door and a decent front row. Where is our third world class lock? Where are are realible front row bench replacements? The England scrum has been flakey for a while now. It blows hot and cold. Our front five bench is not world class.


On the positive side I love our starting backrow right now. I'd like to see them stick together through to the next world cup.


Anyway, there is always another Saturday.

7 Go to comments
C
CO 3 hours ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Robertson is more a manager of coaches than a coach so it comes down to intent of outcomes at a high level. I like his intent, I like the fact his Allblacks are really driving the outcomes however as he's pointed out the high error rates are not test level and their control of the game is driving both wins and losses. England didn't have to play a lot of rugby, they made far fewer mistakes and were extremely unlucky not to win.


In fact the English team were very early in their season and should've been comfortably beaten by an Allblacks team that had played multiple tests together.


Razor has himself recognised that to be the best they'll have to sort out the crisis levels of mistakes that have really increased since the first two tests against England.


Early tackles were a classic example of hyper enthusiasm to not give an inch, that passion that Razor has achieved is going to be formidable once the unforced errors are eliminated.


That's his secret, he's already rebuilt the passion and that's the most important aspect, its inevitable that he'll now eradicate the unforced errors. When that happens a fellow tier one nation is going to get thrashed. I don't think it will be until 2025 though.


The Allblacks will lose both tests against Ireland and France if they play high error rates rugby like they did against England.


To get the unforced errors under control he's going to be needing to handover the number eight role to Sititi and reset expectations of what loose forwards do. Establish a clear distinction with a large, swarthy lineout jumper at six that is a feared runner and dominant tackler and a turnover specialist at seven that is abrasive in contact. He'll then need to build depth behind the three starters and ruthlessly select for that group to be peaking in 2027 in hit Australian conditions on firm, dry grounds.


It's going to help him that Savea is shifting to the worst super rugby franchise where he's going to struggle behind a beaten pack every week.


The under performing loose forward trio is the key driver of the high error rates and unacceptable turn overs due to awol link work. Sititi is looking like he's superman compared to his openside and eight.


At this late stage in the season they shouldn't be operating with just the one outstanding loose forward out of four selected for the English test. That's an abject failure but I think Robertson's sacrificing link quality on purpose to build passion amongst the junior Allblacks as they see the reverential treatment the old warhorses are receiving for their long term hard graft.


It's unfortunately losing test matches and making what should be comfortable wins into nail biters but it's early in the world cup cycle so perhaps it's a sacrifice worth making.


However if this was F1 then Sam Cane would be Riccardo and Ardie would be heading into Perez territory so the loose forwards desperately need revitalisation through a rebuild over the next season to complement the formidable tight five.

28 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ “He’s given Connacht everything” – Bundee Aki’s future, and an exciting tactical innovation “He’s given Connacht everything” – Bundee Aki’s future, and an exciting tactical innovation
Search