Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Forget other challengers, Curry is the biggest threat to Billy Vunipola as England No 8

GettyImages-1181119060

There are few position groups currently in the rugby world as stacked as the England back row and among the healthy – and at times unhealthy – debate on who should feature in such a star-studded unit, long-time starter Billy Vunipola has borne the brunt of the criticism.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was not that long ago that Eddie Jones’ side were utterly reliant on the big ball-carrying No 8, to the point that he had no natural replacement in the side and if he were facing a spell on the sidelines with injury or suspension, chances are England’s form and results on the pitch would take a dive in his absence.

In a pack that did not always boast the most proficient of ball-carriers, Vunipola was integral to getting England moving forward and allowing the dual-playmaker axis of George Ford and Owen Farrell to shine. In the aftermath of the 2015 Rugby World Cup, there was a case to be made that England were more reliant on Vunipola than any other nation was on an individual player, barring perhaps Ireland and Johnny Sexton.

Video Spacer

Which Welsh players can and will make the 2021 Lions tour of South Africa?

Video Spacer

Which Welsh players can and will make the 2021 Lions tour of South Africa?

Times change, however, and not only has England’s stock of back rows blossomed following the emergences of Tom Curry and Sam Underhill as genuine Test arena stars, and Ben Earl and Jack Willis pushing their own claims, but the ball-carrying ability of the tight five has also prospered with Jamie George, Kyle Sinckler and Maro Itoje all adding to Mako Vunipola’s prodigiousness with the ball in hand.

Ironically, with the ball-carrying requirements having lessened on the younger Vunipola brother, critics are keen to point to the fact he is no longer breaking off three or four big tackle-busting runs every game and this has led to the misconception that he is out of form. With Earl and Willis thriving at Bristol Bears and Wasps respectively, not to mention Sam Simmonds troubling the scorers seemingly each and every game with Exeter Chiefs, some have suggested that Vunipola’s place in the starting XV is under the threat.

Whilst Vunipola’s metres per carry may have dropped in the last couple of years, it is important to recognise that this is not necessarily due to a drop in form, but rather a change in role. With the likes of George, Sinckler and Itoje picking up the slack as carriers at first receiver, Vunipola’s quantity of carries has understandably diminished. Underhill and Curry have both brought strong carrying games, too, with the former excelling in space and as a support-runner, and the latter adding his physicality to the tighter exchanges.

This has allowed Vunipola to excel in other areas, such as giving England a strong kick receipt and an ability to ensure that his side has front-foot ball deep inside their own 22, rather than risking losing possession on the back-foot in the face of a ferocious kick chase. Likewise, his physicality and work rate in defence has improved and he wins the collisions on that side of the ball that allow the likes of Curry, Underhill and Itoje to jackal from a position of strength. He is not too shabby over the ball himself, either.

ADVERTISEMENT

With a more balanced carrying effort from the England pack, Vunipola is able to influence the game in other areas and it seems no coincidence that his excellent defensive contributions are coming at a time when Jones has prioritised defence and physicality. If Jones’ comments about focusing on attack post-British and Irish Lions tour are true and not a smokescreen, there’s no reason to doubt that we will see a more heavily involved Vunipola in England’s attack moving toward the 2023 Rugby World Cup.

It’s unfortunate for a player like Simmonds that he doesn’t seem to fit the mould of what Jones is looking for at the base of the scrum and he isn’t the first player, nor will he be the last, to light up the Gallagher Premiership and miss out on regular international action due to the depth of the player pool and a coach’s particular preference when it comes to individual positional traits. This is certainly true of Zach Mercer, too.

That leaves Earl and Willis as the pretenders to the English back row throne and whilst their claims are entirely worthy, it is from current teammate Curry where Vunipola’s most potent challenge could come.

As a fresh-faced jackaling openside brought into the team to help create more turnovers, Curry has now evolved into a versatile hybrid back rower who can legitimately fill any role asked of him in the loose forwards. It would not be surprising if this were always Jones’ vision for him, which would explain why he initially got the nod ahead of his brother Ben, who has always looked the more natural openside of the pair.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tom may not boast Vunipola’s size or ability to ride tackles from a standing start, but he is beginning to win in all the areas that Vunipola himself excels.

Curry can generate power in the collision with very little momentum, his physicality is second to none for his size and he has started to offer that same kind of violence in the carry that makes him all but impossible to be stopped one-on-one. Throw into the mix that he is also now beginning to have more involvement on the kick receipt and he is slowly but surely ticking those same boxes that Vunipola has been completing for years. Let us not forget that Curry is also rapidly becoming a highly effective lineout option, something which adds to his value significantly as it allows Jones to have more freedom with his other selections in the back row.

Curry’s consistency also reflects very favourably on him and it would not be surprising if at some point over the next 12 months, he is trialled at No 8 from the start of a game. If Vunipola were to get injured or Jones looks elsewhere whilst the talismanic back rower is plying his trade in the Greene King IPA Championship, an ajar door is all it seems it would take for Curry to prosper in a new role in England’s pack.

So, whilst the form and abilities that Earl and Willis bring are important – and Jones won’t make changes for the sake of it – it has relatively little bearing without Curry showcasing that he can fill that Vunipola role in the starting XV. And he is getting there, for sure.

That all said, we should do away with the notion that Vunipola is out of form or that a less flashy Vunipola is in fact any less of a contributor to England’s current success. The biggest compliment that you can currently pay England is that they simply do not look like losing and Vunipola is a sizeable part of that.

As exciting as it is to see Earl and Willis lighting up the Premiership – and shining in a 6-2 English bench split – it is hard to say that they would make England a better team than Vunipola does.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search