Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Former All Black would rather pick up dog s*** than watch England play

Elliot Daly - PA

A former All Black has said he’d rather have picked up dog excrement at his local park than have watched England’s Rugby World Cup semi-final against South Africa.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks edged past Steve Borthwick’s men in sodden conditions in the French capital, a game which was dominated by aerial brinkmanship, a high-stakes kick chase game and plenty of forward grunt.

Yet while it was low low-scoring affair,  the consensus on the ground was that it was a tense, edge-of-your-seat thriller which was hard to take your eyes off, right up until the final whistle was blown.

Video Spacer

All Black defence coach Scott McLeod explains some of the biggest challenges his team will face against the Springboks

Video Spacer

All Black defence coach Scott McLeod explains some of the biggest challenges his team will face against the Springboks

However, not everyone was happy.

Former New Zealand scrumhalf Steve Devine, speaking on SENZ radio in New Zealand, said he felt sorry for fans who paid ‘good money’ to watch England’s 1-point loss to the defending world champs.

“I hate England. Their whole game,” said the ten cap All Black. “I honestly would have rather gone down to my local dog park and picked up s***.

“That’s how exciting I found that. If that wasn’t the World Cup semi-final, that would have been the worst game of rugby ever played,” continued Devine.

Devine was asked how much interest there would have been in the semi-final in Paris if it hadn’t been a World Cup match and he said: “There wouldn’t have been any. I feel horribly disappointed that people paid good money for those seats.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Devine’s hatred of England seems very real and a quick check of his Test career might point to an underlying cause.

In his ten Test career, Devine had just two losses, and they both came against – you guessed it – England.

He made his debut as part of an All Blacks end-of-year tour back in 2002 against England in Twickenham and lost to Clive Woodward’s side 31-28.

He got his chance for revenge when England toured New Zealand and Australia a year later in June 2003. Unfortunately for Devine, he lost that one too, with the All Blacks going down 15-13 in Wellington. England went on to win the Rugby World Cup, a tournament which also saw the end of his own  journey as an All Black.

ADVERTISEMENT

It leaves the former Blues player as maybe the only New Zealand test player ever to have played more than one test against England and still have a 100 per cent losing record against them.

Related

 

 

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

75 Comments
C
Cam 422 days ago

It’s certainly an opinion. Not that anyone here feels that is worth the ‘paper’ it was written on.

t
trent 423 days ago

England is boring. He pointed out the obvious.

J
Joerg 423 days ago

Sorry. All that stories, Rugbypass offers are such a rotten cheddar cheese. I really dont know, what some authors aim. Poorest level. I am loking forward for a huge final and I was surprised about England. They did what they can do in the semifinal very well. I spported SAF for that match in the stadium, but it was 80 minutes crimetime with a lucky winner, but not undeserved. Wheather wasn't easy. England managed it better. A lot of Newzealander was in the stadium too. They were very fair. Good sport spirit. Really a lot of french and England supporters was awkward. Thats what I saw and heard in the stadium. I saw all knockout games in Paris 1/4 and 1/2 finals. All that rugbypass-stories, you can forget. P.S I am european..

G
Grant 423 days ago

Is he related to Matt Williams or Ben Smith?

J
Joe 423 days ago

Another trash comment from an All Black. New Zealand geographically is isolated, and apart from Australia,has very little in common with it’s neighboring countries. They pine for mother England, as is evidenced by their adherence to King Charles and the British commonwealth. Insulting England is just a cry for attention, and New Zealand and Australia cling stubbornly to their “Britishness” ! In fact, South Africa rejoined the commonwealth in 1994, and embraces rugby, cricket and colonialism! All this current online tirade against the “northern hemisphere “ is a cry for attention!

T
Tony 423 days ago

Maaaaan clickbait is annoying… we all know it’s tripe but we all keep clicking.

As a side, it is amazing how the NZ and SA rhetoric has changed since France and Ireland were knocked out… tails are up and the trash talking begins… Yawn…

S
Sumkunn Tsadmiova 423 days ago

If I was a dog in New Zealand and thought there was a chance an All Black would pick up my shit I’d be really excited. But if I then found out it would be a total nonentity like Steve Devine I’d be very sad. Come on England, hurry up and play something more to little Steve’s liking please….

A
Alexander 423 days ago

Actually sounds like a classless and crass individual, listening back to it. Give me Eggchasers and Two Cents any day of the week!!!

B
Blair 423 days ago

The guys a nobody, this is just stirring up nonsense.
I love how rugby has so many different formulae for victory. Whilst I prefer the running rugby of NZ, Ireland or France the set piece dominated style brings a different flavour to the game

S
Sumkunn Tsadmiova 423 days ago

Amazingly, in his very brief All Black career, little Steve Devine managed to play England twice. Those two losses have obviously festered ever since. He did, however, manage to play in an AB team that beat Canada. So presumably they’re ok. But really the only thing that’s dogshit here is little Stevie’s international record (Played2, Lost2) vs. England…

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search