Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Former Bok captain not sold on Johan Goosen as Springboks flyhalf

(Photo by Getty Images)

Springbok legend Jean de Villiers believes the flyhalf position is a “big red flag” for the Springboks ahead of their Tests in Europe next month.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks revealed a 26-man training squad on Tuesday ahead of the tour and Johan Goosen was the only player listed as a flyhalf.

Damian Willemse has been listed as a utility back, but he is expected to don the No 10 jersey again as he has done on several occasions this year so far.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Elton Jantjies is currently dealing with personal issues, while Handre Pollard is nursing a knee injury.

Speaking at a URC media round table on Tuesday, De Villiers expressed his concerns over the all-important No.10 role.

“No.10 is the position that is the biggest worry from a South African point of view, especially with [Handre] Pollard being injured,” said De Villiers.

“Damian Wilemse can do the job there, but I am still of the view that No.12 is his best position.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Elton Jantjies is going through personal stuff and I don’t think it will be right to include him in that setup. He needs to sort out his personal life, which is way more important than rugby.”

De Villiers added: “Flyhalf is the one position where not a lot of answers were given throughout the Rugby Championship and going into the tour that is going to be a big concern.

“Even though the Springboks kick a lot off No 9, you do need that general to be able to take control of the game.

“When you play up north in the wet, it is even more important to control the game.

“That is the big red flag from a South African point of view.”

De Villiers said he was not convinced by Goosen’s performances for the Bulls so far this season.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don’t think Goosen has shown enough. His form before his [knee] injury was fantastic, but I don’t think he has shown the same form coming back yet.

“The Bulls’ performances have not helped with that at all.

“He is definitely a guy that they will be looking at in the long term, but if you had to go into a game tomorrow, I would go with Damian Willemse at No.10 and Wille le Roux at No.15.

“I just like the balance that [combination] brings to the team.

“It happened through substitutions in that first Test match against Wales in Pretoria and I really like what I saw.

“You also have that left-right combination in terms of kicking.

“Defensively, Damian Willemse is really strong in that channel and he can do the job there and then from an attacking point of view – depending on where you are on the field – they can just interchange that No.10 and No.15 positions.”

Despite that potential combination, De Villiers is not expecting the Boks to deviate too much from their “conservative” game plan on tour.

“We know that the Boks play pretty conservative and when it comes to selection, they will probably go with a conservative option again,” De Villiers explained.

“What that will look like, I don’t know at this stage.

“I think we are very limited in terms of No.10s at the moment and long-term it will be Goosen.

“That [Goosen’s inclusion] probably shows the hand of the Boks.

“Frans Steyn might still play a part as well from the bench and they will probably go with that and with Willemse to start at No.10.

“Steyn and Faf de Klerk will fill that replacement flyhalf position and Goosen will probably get a run against Italy.”

-Warren Fortune/Rugby365

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
S
Snash 747 days ago

he is not playing with confidence at URC level at the minute never mind test level

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
Oh no, not him again? 2 hours ago
England internationals disagree on final play execution vs All Blacks

Okay, so we blew it big time on Saturday. So rather than repeating what most people have all ready said, what do I want to see from Borthwick going forward?


Let's keep Marcus Smith on the pitch if he's fit and playing well. I was really pleased with his goal kicking. It used to be his weakness. I feel sympathy for George Ford who hadn't kicked all match and then had a kick to win the game. You hear pundits and commentators commend kickers who have come off the bench and pulled that off. Its not easy. If Steve B continues to substitute players with no clear reason then he is going to get criticised.


On paper I thought England would beat NZ if they played to their potential and didn't show NZ too much respect. Okay, the off the ball tackles certainly stopped England scoring tries, but I would have liked to see more smashing over gainlines and less kicking for position. Yes, I also know it's the Springbok endorsed world cup double winning formula but the Kiwi defence isn't the Bok defence, is it. If you have the power to put Smith on the front foot then why muzzle him? I guess what I'm saying is back, yourself. Why give the momentum to a team like NZ? Why feed the beast? Don't give the ball to NZ. Well d'uh.


Our scrum is a long term weakness. If you are going to play Itoje then he needs an ogre next door and a decent front row. Where is our third world class lock? Where are are realible front row bench replacements? The England scrum has been flakey for a while now. It blows hot and cold. Our front five bench is not world class.


On the positive side I love our starting backrow right now. I'd like to see them stick together through to the next world cup.


Anyway, there is always another Saturday.

7 Go to comments
C
CO 2 hours ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Robertson is more a manager of coaches than a coach so it comes down to intent of outcomes at a high level. I like his intent, I like the fact his Allblacks are really driving the outcomes however as he's pointed out the high error rates are not test level and their control of the game is driving both wins and losses. England didn't have to play a lot of rugby, they made far fewer mistakes and were extremely unlucky not to win.


In fact the English team were very early in their season and should've been comfortably beaten by an Allblacks team that had played multiple tests together.


Razor has himself recognised that to be the best they'll have to sort out the crisis levels of mistakes that have really increased since the first two tests against England.


Early tackles were a classic example of hyper enthusiasm to not give an inch, that passion that Razor has achieved is going to be formidable once the unforced errors are eliminated.


That's his secret, he's already rebuilt the passion and that's the most important aspect, its inevitable that he'll now eradicate the unforced errors. When that happens a fellow tier one nation is going to get thrashed. I don't think it will be until 2025 though.


The Allblacks will lose both tests against Ireland and France if they play high error rates rugby like they did against England.


To get the unforced errors under control he's going to be needing to handover the number eight role to Sititi and reset expectations of what loose forwards do. Establish a clear distinction with a large, swarthy lineout jumper at six that is a feared runner and dominant tackler and a turnover specialist at seven that is abrasive in contact. He'll then need to build depth behind the three starters and ruthlessly select for that group to be peaking in 2027 in hit Australian conditions on firm, dry grounds.


It's going to help him that Savea is shifting to the worst super rugby franchise where he's going to struggle behind a beaten pack every week.


The under performing loose forward trio is the key driver of the high error rates and unacceptable turn overs due to awol link work. Sititi is looking like he's superman compared to his openside and eight.


At this late stage in the season they shouldn't be operating with just the one outstanding loose forward out of four selected for the English test. That's an abject failure but I think Robertson's sacrificing link quality on purpose to build passion amongst the junior Allblacks as they see the reverential treatment the old warhorses are receiving for their long term hard graft.


It's unfortunately losing test matches and making what should be comfortable wins into nail biters but it's early in the world cup cycle so perhaps it's a sacrifice worth making.


However if this was F1 then Sam Cane would be Riccardo and Ardie would be heading into Perez territory so the loose forwards desperately need revitalisation through a rebuild over the next season to complement the formidable tight five.

28 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ England need to face a few home truths if they are to relearn that winning habit England need to face a few home truths if they are to relearn that winning habit
Search