Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Former Eddie Jones favourite in disbelief over Wallabies exit rumours

Eddie Jones, Head Coach of Australia, during the warm up prior to the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between Australia and Georgia at Stade de France on September 09, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images)

With reports swirling that Eddie Jones is set to leave his post with Australia after less than a year in charge in order to rejoin Japan, a former player of his, Matt Giteau, has summed up how most people are reacting to this news.

ADVERTISEMENT

The versatile back given his first Wallabies cap under Jones in 2002 before going on to play 103 matches in gold. He seems to be in a state of disbelief at how the events have unfolded, and it is easy to understand why.

The 41-year-old took to X to write: “Reports on Eddie Jones to leave Australia surely this can’t be accurate.” Though Australia had a disastrous World Cup, Jones was brought in on a five-year deal with the aim of building for the future, with a British & Irish Lions series in 2025 and the next World Cup in 2027 both being in Australia.

That was the reasoning behind sacking Dave Rennie and appointing Jones, and also why Jones opted to pick such an inexperienced Wallabies team for this World Cup. Seeing as Jones is at the beginning of this journey, it explains why the likes of Giteau are in disbelief about what is currently happening as Japan look for their replacement for the departing Jamie Joseph.

According to Japanese outlet Sponichi, the move back to the Brave Blossoms is almost there though.

“Current Australian national team coach Eddie Jones is expected to return as the successor to Joseph,” the website claimed.

“This spring, Masato Tsuchida, president of the Japan Association, with whom he has had a honeymoon relationship since his days at Suntory, contacted him.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Contract negotiations have been held privately behind the scenes, and preparations are underway for (his) return (for the first time) since the 2015 World Cup, which led them to a historic three wins.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
P
Paul 436 days ago

If, as is reported, Jones agreed terms with Japan 6 months ago, there are serious questions for him to answer. He selected an inexperienced squad with an eye on 2027 but left a few experienced heads at home who could have made a difference.

If he had no intention of staying beyond 2023, his selections could be deemed to have been for an ulterior motive - another sacking and another big pay day, with another job to walk into!!

I know that sounds a bit tin foil hat, but anyone with eyes could see he wasn’t putting Australia first.

T
Turlough 436 days ago

“I don’t know what you’re talking about mate…”

O
Ozrugbynut 436 days ago

This is just the start of this story. Get the popcorn.

J
Jacinda 436 days ago

Give yourself an uppercut Eddie, make it a few

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search