Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Former lawyer Wayne Barnes keeps his cool in bruising Rugby World Cup final

By PA
Wayne Barnes - PA

Wayne Barnes was at the centre of arguably the most dramatic World Cup final of them all as South Africa edged New Zealand 12-11 at the Stade de France.

ADVERTISEMENT

The English referee showed the first ever red card in a men’s final when New Zealand captain Sam Cane saw his yellow for a dangerous tackle on Jesse Kriel upgraded by the bunker review system.

Barnes sent Cane to the sin-bin in the 28th minute and soon after it was confirmed that one of the players of the tournament would be forced to sit out the remainder of its showpiece occasion.

Video Spacer

RWC Final – New Zealand v South Africa

Watch highlights, reaction and more to the RWC Final at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

Video Spacer

RWC Final – New Zealand v South Africa

Watch highlights, reaction and more to the RWC Final at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

Another contentious moment arrived in the 46th minute when South Africa skipper Siya Kolisi made a tackle on Ardie Savea that resulted in a clash of heads.

Barnes showed a yellow card to Kolisi and put the incident on review, but on this occasion the bunker felt the offence was not serious enough to warrant a red.

Overall, it was the most indisciplined final of all time with Cane’s red and three sin-binnings keeping Barnes busy.

Andy Goode wrote: “Kiwi’s raging about Wayne Barnes again, thought he had a good game.”

It was a tough night for the ex-lawyer, who is the game’s foremost referee, but he got most of the decisions right with the two biggest calls made by the bunker.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

66 Comments
s
sam 419 days ago

He is suitable for his previous job (lawyer). When people like this are refereed and sent to the middle of the finals, the matches are messed up and the players' years of hard work, hope, dedication, and money are all lost because of one stupid decision. What he did hurts him till death. once a clown always clown!!!

A
Another 419 days ago

I don’t have an issue with Barnes or his refereeing. There were contentious calls but you could justify them either way. Referees have the hardest job on the pitch and in tight games their errors are highlighted more than anybody else. The All Blacks were unlucky, to a degree, but the Red Card was down to the player actions, first and foremost. It wasn’t the referee’s fault.

The contentious issues I had was with Barnes admitting he called a Penalty to Savea wrong, while the kick was still awarded. That is weird anomaly in the Laws that, while a try and conversion can apparently be reversed, a Penalty kick cannot even when it is given in error.

I also felt at least one scrum in the last 10 minutes should have had a SA prop penalised.

Would it have made a difference? Probably, although the ABs would still have to have made their kicks. They had two opportunities given to move ahead in the scoreline (the conversion and the long distance penalty) and win - but they didn’t take them. They probably should have brought on DMac earlier too, and I still think Roigard would have been a much better player to bring on than Christie in that situation. But that is all down to the selectors and coaches. Not referees.

SA deserved to win, even if they were lucky. Their defeated opponents still need to look at themselves first, whether it is France with their lapse defence (4 tries conceded), England with their attacking limitations (no tries scored) or NZ with their lack of discipline (a Red and Yellow). No excuses.

P
Petrus78 419 days ago

The other foot

P
Petrus78 419 days ago

It’s so funny when the shoe is on the foot……😁

P
Peter 419 days ago

November 2022 after France beat South Africa… “South Africa Rugby is under increasing pressure to take action against Rassie Erasmus after the Rugby Football Union lodged a complaint over his social media posts concerning the refereeing of Wayne Barnes, who has been the subject of death threats.”

So what happens a year down the track, they choose Barnes to referee the World Cup final and expect him to be fair and impartial. Imagine what he and his family would have gone through if South Africa had lost the final?

K
Kevin 419 days ago

SA won the World Cup getting the benefit of the doubt.

S
Steven 419 days ago

Congratulations to South Africa on going back to back and being first to 4... however I'm not going to overlook the elephant in the room.
 
I guess it was inevitable that the final of Rugby's showpiece tournament would be ruined and decided by the excessive head contact rules that have come into use in the last 4 years, and their subjective interpretation, which have already ruined a number of games for the fans.
 
Administrators can try to justify them on the basis of player safety and PC press (who are afraid of being osttracised by the establishment) can go along with them, but the Emperor has no clothes.
 
I believe the current situation is untenable and has to change. Rugby is a contact sport and the majority of head contacts that are currently being penalised with yellow and red cards are accidental and just an inevitable part of the playing the game, and, as such, will not become less frequent over time as a result of cards being handed out. Therefore If the purpose of handing out cards to discourage future infringements and avoid concussion law suits it's not working, and if you come back in 100 years time you will still be seeing the same types of accidental head contact incidents that occurred In this final (and other games over the last 4 years),
 
It will not be effective as a defense against any concussion class action that may be brought, because the majority of concussions in rugby fall outside of the curent head contact punishment rules anyway, and will continue to occur. Tacklers will continue to get concussed when their heads accidentaly come into contact with the ball carriers hip or shoulder, or when two tacklers coming from opposite sides of the ball carrier end up having a head clash, or when a player hits his head on the ground during a tackle etc. Also ball carriers very rarely punished for using their elbows to fend off tacklers, and, in fact, there appears to have been an example of this in the final which was not picked up.
 
One day there will have to be a rethink, but in the mean time games and tournaments are being ruined, or decided arbitrarily, by the subjectivity of the officials, for no useful purpose. (Note I'm not blaming the individual officials themselves, but the administrators who are issueing them with the instructions on how to interpret the rules)
 
 
Under the current rules Siya Kolisi should have got a red card, even though we know that no-one deliberately clashes heads with another player
However the subjective decision of the TMO was only to give him a yellow. In my view Savea is standing relatively upright, not crouched, so there is no mitigating factor. Kolisi's body position is irrelevant and so not mitigating. However if we must go there, then Kolisi initiated direct head contact and in my opinion only Savea's body position can be a mitigating factor. The fact that Kolisi is bent over and drives up is in no way mitigating, red card.
(But if I was running things it would not even have been a yellow)
 
 
Under the current rules Sam Cane gets a yellow card, which was later subjectively upgraded to red
In my view Jesse Kriel is crouching, in order to lower his centre of gravity as he drives into contact, which is a mitigating factor. 
Cane is standing in the normal position for a tackler, with legs slightly bent, and wraps his arms, so not reckless, and the ruling should have remained a yellow
(However if I was running things it would not even have been a yellow)

D
Driss 419 days ago

Worst clown referee . In retreat this clown

W
Wayne 419 days ago

As a South African, I say that the call on Sam was unlucky. A yellow would’ve been suffice. Nothing like Owens tackles. Would’ve been nice to have seen Sam back on the field. Brilliant player with an unlucky call

W
Wayne 419 days ago

If it wasn’t for the TMO’s always reviewing things then it wouldn’t happen. All the other WC there was no such thing. So this is going to be a more common thing happening in WC’s unfortunately

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search