Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Former Scotland international Craig Chalmers reveals cancer diagnosis

Craig Chalmers of Scotland is tackled by Brian O''Meara, #9, of Ireland during the Five Nations match at Murrayfield. Scotland beat Ireland 38-10. Mandatory Credit: Andrew Redington /Allsport

Former Scotland and British and Irish Lions stand-off Craig Chalmers has revealed that he is suffering from prostate cancer.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 55-year-old, who lives and works in London, was given the diagnosis on Friday after several weeks of tests, but is optimistic about the prognosis. He said: “It was a shock and it really hits you to hear the C word, but it is what it is and I’ve been lucky really, because since I turned 50 I’ve had annual tests and so despite having symptoms whatsoever it was picked up.

“It has been a difficult time because after my usual blood test check-up, the doctor was back in touch while I was on holiday to say I should have some tests, and it became obvious that something wasn’t right. You spend days thinking and worrying about what it might be, and I had MRI tests and things, and then last week they said ‘yes, it’s prostate cancer’. It’s confined to the prostate at the moment so I have options for treatment, whether I have radiotherapy or an operation, and I’ll discuss that with my surgeon on Friday and we’ll take it from there.

Video Spacer

Answering your most asked rugby questions | Ben Curry

Video Spacer

Answering your most asked rugby questions | Ben Curry

“But I do consider myself lucky to have found it early. My PSA number (prostate specific antigen) test went up this year and that was how they spotted it, so the big message in this for me and everyone really is that you have to get yourself tested. I have a good network of family and friends around me and they will help me get through this, but it’s important that we talk about things like this. I think men in their 50s do not speak about personal things much with each other, and when you come up against something like this you realise how important it is to talk and encourage each other to look after your health.”

One of the people Chalmers turned to is former teammate Kenny Logan, who was diagnosed with prostate cancer two years ago and opted to undergo an operation to remove his prostate. Another former Scotland player who went public about his own diagnosis was John Rutherford, another former stand-off, and he remains a supporter of Prostate charities after surviving his diagnosis, but only after losing his brother to the disease.

A father and grandfather, Chalmers insisted: “I’ve been lucky because I’ve been getting tested every year but I now understand better than I did, as Kenny and John did, how important it is to get yourself tested regularly because otherwise how would you catch it early?

“Kenny has been brilliant and he has known since my first high PSA test. He has been through it, so that helps, having someone who knows what the options are and the steps you take. It has been a tough few weeks but now I’m happier that I know what it is and we can move on and get it operated on. The way I’m thinking right now, I think I’m going to go down the operation route, and get it out of me, but we’ll see what the surgeon says before I made any decisions.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search