Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Former mentor Schalk Burger explains what position suits Ben Earl best

Ben Earl/ Press Association

For a player that only took hold of the England No8 jersey last summer while Billy Vunipola was banned, Ben Earl seized the opportunity to make the shirt his own.

ADVERTISEMENT

A World Cup and a Guinness Six Nations have elapsed since then, and the 26-year-old has established himself as one of the first names on Steve Borthwick’s teamsheet at the back of the scrum.

But his journey to the white No8 shirt has not been an easy one.

Used sparingly as a flanker during Eddie Jones’ tenure, Earl experienced a similar treatment at the beginning of Borthwick’s reign last year when he was axed from the England squad. But his former Saracens teammate Schalk Burger believes this was while he was understanding his own game.

Video Spacer

Farrell vs Borthwick – Boks Office on who would take it | RPTV

The Boks Office crew are back to discuss the latest goings on in the Six Nations. Watch the full show exclusively on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Farrell vs Borthwick – Boks Office on who would take it | RPTV

The Boks Office crew are back to discuss the latest goings on in the Six Nations. Watch the full show exclusively on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Now he has found his place in the England squad, the South African has praised his former teammate for his “outstanding” Six Nations, where he has been the recipient of the player of the match award in two of his four matches so far.

The 2007 World Cup winner played with Earl in black during the early stages of the Englishman’s career, and mentored him while was establishing himself as a teenager.

Six Nations Six Nations
Six Nations Greatest XV
Brian O'Driscoll
Brian O'Driscoll

Given the strengths that the 29-cap international has, Burger said that Earl is better suited to playing No8 rather than flanker on RPTV’s Boks Office recently, as his “point of difference” is his explosiveness, which can be exploited better at the back of the scrum.

Earl faces stiff competition for that No8 shirt for England with Alex Dombrandt in the squad, Alfie Barbeary rising through the ranks and Zach Mercer surely destined to emerge back on the scene again, but for now it is inconceivable that anyone could prise it away from the Saracen.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I thought the World Cup is where he came to the front of everyone’s minds, thinking ‘how good is he?'” Burger said on the podcast.

“He was busting the tackles, running stats, tackle stats, offloads, stepping, metres gained, he was their player of the World Cup no problem. Then you want him to kick on.

“I remember taking him for a few beers, he was a youngster and I was mentoring him at Saracens- a proper talented player.

“It’s taken him a while to understand his own game. He was openside flanker, but I think No8 is his best position, he’s outstanding.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He’s got that nice bit of explosiveness and I think at No8, when you’ve got that, you can play forward, you can play back, you can pop up in wider channels. You don’t rev your engine as hard as you do at openside. Openside you’re at that first breakdown, you’re at the next and you work your socks off.

“Sometimes I think with an explosive runner like him, you take away your point of difference. Whereas at No8, when you’re not involved as much as openside, it frees you up to roam about a bit, and he’s been outstanding.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
f
finn 282 days ago

I find a lot of these conversations a little bit silly. Number 8 and Openside are only fixed positions at scrum time, so there’s no reason players need to stick to them in open play.

If Earl is best scrumming at flanker, but needs to be involved less than a typical openside, then coaches might be able to make that work without switching him to 8.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search