Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Former NRL, SANZAAR and Wales boss launches his vision for a radical new version of rugby

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Press Release from Rugby Rules

Rugby Rules is being launched today as an alternative to all the major full contact sports – Rugby Union, Australian Football and Rugby League.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s been designed as a safe, exciting, dynamic, fast and fun sport which can be enjoyed by coaches, players, referees, spectators, sponsors and media.

Rugby Rules is the brainchild of two people with a huge interest and involvement in Rugby over 120 years in total, both from different backgrounds – David Moffett and Enrique Rodriguez.

Video Spacer

Rugby Wrap Up | Episode 15

Video Spacer

Rugby Wrap Up | Episode 15

Together they own Rugby Rules Limited and have offices in Australia and New Zealand.

‘Topo’ Rodriguez, an Argentine and Wallabies international, is still regarded as one of the finest exponents of loose head scrummaging the world has seen.

He is a Triple Rugby Union International (Argentina, Tahiti, Australia), Wallabies captain (1987), Australian U21s Forward and Scrum Coach (Southern Hemisphere Championship, Buenos Aires 1995).

Moffett is a former player, referee and administrator.

Moffett has been the CEO of SANZAR, NZ Rugby, Welsh Rugby, the NRL and started his career as the Executive Director of NSW Rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

Importantly they are both fans, supporters and spectators who have become disillusioned with the current state of Rugby.

Over the past two months they have found much in common and both agreed that the solutions lay, not in tinkering with the current laws of Rugby, but to devise a completely new game which has its roots in Rugby, League and Aussie Rules.

Moffett set about writing the rules for this new game and ‘Topo’ provided the perfect sounding board and astute observations and recommendations.

In many respects Rugby Rules is similar to Rugby but at the same time completely different. It was born out of a dissatisfaction with Rugby and its administrators at the apex of the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

https://www.instagram.com/p/CD95itBgibG/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

Both Moffett and Rodriguez are known for calling a spade a shovel and thus it was a simple matter to agree on the fundamentals of the game.

At its most basic it is a game for contest of possession and to be played by players who are on their feet and onside.

When we make that statement, we mean it and the rules of the game were easy to formulate once that was agreed.

We also wanted a return to a dynamic game where the focus is on going forward, support, continuity and pressure with and without the ball.

We were also concerned with making the game safe to play whilst at the same time encouraging full contact.

We wanted the ball to be in play for the full 60 minutes and because of the speed of the game we settled on 3 periods of 20 minutes with 10 minute breaks in between periods 1 and 2.

We want players to be true athletes and consequently there is no lifting in the lineouts, scrum resets are consigned to history, cleaning out is banned and the game is played by 14 players consisting of 6 forwards and 8 backs.

There are only 6 replacements, 7 coaches and support staff, resulting in substantial cost savings.

Referees revert to being the sole judge of fact and time. Line judges are responsible for touch and may report on offside and foul play. There will no outside interference or input from a TMO.

It is over 100 years since a variation of Rugby was introduced to the world as a result of a lack of understanding and foresight, and we believe that the time has come for a fresh approach which is based on the past, present and future of the game.

Rugby Rules is the answer, with a game that is simple to coach, play, referee and watch while still retaining those elements that so many people are drawn to.

For a full explanation of the laws of Rugby Rules, click here.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 6 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Smith generally isn't well connected to his forward pods; doesn't do a great job of distributing to those around him; and has inferior positional and contestable kicking games than Ford and Fin.


When England have had success over the past few years, its been either through (i) defensive rugby backed up with smart tactical kicking or (ii) high possession attacking phase play based on quick ruck ball. George Ford was key to the implementation of (i) in the RWC, and in the 6N win over Wales, and to the implementation of (ii) in the 6N games against Ireland and France. Smith did great at (ii) when running at tired defenders at the end of the Ireland match, but has never successfully implemented that gameplan from the start of a test because he doesn't distribute or support his forwards enough to create consistent fast ball and build attacks over multiple phases. Instead, his introduction to the starting side has resulted in much more playmaking responsibilities being forced onto whoever plays 9. Alex Mitchell copes ok with that, but I think he looks better with a more involved playmaking 10 outside him, and it really isn't a gameplan that works for JVP or Spencer. As a result of that the outside backs and centres have barely touched the ball when Smith has been at 10.


This might not have been too much of a disaster, as England have seemed to be moving slightly towards the sort of attacking gameplan that France played under Labit and Quins play (I think this was especially their approach when they won the league a few years ago - but its still a part of their play now), which is based on kicking to create broken field rugby. This is (i) a sharp departure from the gameplans that have worked for England in the past few seasons; (ii) bears very little relation to the tactical approaches of the non-Quins players in the England team; and (iii) is an absolute disaster for the blitz defence, which is weak in transition. Unsurprisingly, it has coincided with a sharp decline in England's results.

68 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What is the future of rugby in 2025? What is the future of rugby in 2025?
Search