Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Four Ireland talking points as they cling to a win over Argentina

By Liam Heagney at Aviva Stadium, Dublin
Josh van der Flier (third from left) and teammate Thomas Clarkson (fourth from left) celebrate Ireland's victory over Argentina (Photo by Piaras Ó Mídheach/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Friday’s Autumn Nations Series result in Dublin was ultimately as expected, an Ireland win by a close margin over an Argentina team very much improved under Felipe Contepomi.

ADVERTISEMENT

Andy Farrell’s teams have been in the habit of quickly bouncing back from a loss on his watch. This was the seventh occasion that a defeat was immediately followed by a win, a pattern stretching back to February 2021.

There were quibbles about the manner of the performance but the ugly 22-19 success against the Pumas was nonetheless impressive for the dogged fashion in which they refused to bend, getting their November back on track following last weekend’s disappointing 13-23 loss to New Zealand.

Video Spacer

Felipe Contepomi on the passion of Argentina | RPTV

Leinster and Argentina legend Felipe Contepomi chats to former teammate Brian O’Driscoll about coaching Argentina. Watch the full clip on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Felipe Contepomi on the passion of Argentina | RPTV

Leinster and Argentina legend Felipe Contepomi chats to former teammate Brian O’Driscoll about coaching Argentina. Watch the full clip on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Their hope will be that this latest recovery will lead on to further wins versus Fiji and Australia to send Farrell, the 2025 British and Irish Lions boss, off on his sabbatical with a genuine smile rather than Friday’s grimace. Here are the RugbyPass Ireland talking points following their Argentine nail-biter:

Penalty avalanche
It says a lot about Ireland’s grit that they have managed to win two of their last three matches despite getting done on the penalty count – cumulatively conceding 37 penalties to 19 – and suffering an avalanche of 54 points from 18 kicks off the tee as a result.

In Durban 18 weeks ago, they conceded 11 penalties to eight, inviting South Africa to kick eight penalties for 24 points. Last week in Dublin, it was 13 penalties to five which allowed New Zealand to kick six penalties for 18 points.

Then on Friday night back at the Aviva it was 13 penalties to six, a tally that led to Argentina kicking four of the penalties for 12 points.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ireland still pipped the Springboks and the Pumas by one- and three-point margins either side of the 10-point loss to the All Blacks. But these excessive penalty numbers are not a good look for a team that historically gives up very few double digit concessions.

Of course, the game has been altered since July with the latest round of law updates. It was why Finlay Bealham was yellow carded for his 17th-minute croc roll on Joel Sclavi, but Ireland can’t blame all the indiscipline on it suddenly being ‘a new game’.

The 25th-minute obstruction from Ronan Kelleher and the push from James Lowe 24 minutes later were simply sloppy, needless concessions.

There were also avoidable technical offences, such as closing the gap at the lineout on 40 minutes and not driving straight at a 63rd-minute scrum, and that’s before we get into the list of offsides and no release breakdown calls.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s time for Ireland to stop the rot and get off this naughty step.

Penalties

13
Penalties Conceded
6
2
Yellow Cards
2
0
Red Cards
0

A second too-long scoring blank
Aside from discipline, it’s fair to say that Ireland also have an attack intensity issue to investigate. It has gone under the radar that they are playing in this Autumn Nations Series without Mike Catt as their backs and attack coach.

He was the assistant that emboldened their creativity some years ago, helping to deliver back-to-back Six Nations titles and seeing them travel to France 2023 as one of the favourites to lift the trophy.

Opting to step away from the Test game, Catt has signed up for a Super Rugby Pacific stint with the Waratahs in Australia which was why he had his successor Andrew Goodman down in South Africa four months ago shadowing him before properly stepping into the role this November.

Goodman, a former Leinster and Crusaders assistant, worked with Samoa at last year’s World Cup, so he isn’t a Test level rookie, but it seems to have been a tricky settling in period these past few weeks running the backs and helping Farrell with attacking strategy.

It’s weird given the rich plaudits for the levels of Irish potency in recent years that they were held scoreless from the 43rd-minute against New Zealand and from the 33rdminute versus Argentina. They are both extraordinarily long barren periods for a team you would not characterise as blunt.

Their threat was evident in the opening salvo where they ‘won’ the 10-minute period of the Matias Moroni yellow card 12-3 and were then only a Tadhg Beirne grounding away from another try shortly after the binned Argentine returned.

That was an impressive reminder that Farrell’s Ireland can still excitingly carve an opposition open, but these second-half blanks must be addressed.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by RugbyPass (@rugbypass)

‘Chopper’ back to best
Josh van der Flier was back to his ‘chopper’ best versus the Pumas, the flanker credited with 24 tackles, the sort of influence that had him voted as the world’s best in 2022. But he also showed another side to his game as there were 14 carries.

His gain might have been limited to just 21 metres but those sort of repeat little wins were crucial in the heavy traffic where the dynamic Juan Martin Gonzalez was brutally effective with his frequent dominant hits. He was some nuisance!

Back to the Irish defence, though, which really was pivotal to them winning ugly. Ronan Kelleher and Caelan Doris, for instance, both made 18 tackles, and the rip effected by Garry Ringrose at the end of the first half was a superb intervention.

The midfielder’s critics will shine a light on how he slipped off tackling Juan Cruz Mallia at the start of the Argentine’s classy break from halfway to the tryline four minutes after the break.

But Ringrose wasn’t the only player at fault in a concession where brilliance won out. Just look at Mallia’s footwork to breeze past Mack Hansen. Sublime.

The Clarkson optimism
Farrell took a post-New Zealand loss shellacking in the Irish media for not using the series opener as the chance to look to the future in some areas of his team rather than roll out familiar faces with a view to them get back at the visitors 13 months after that classic – but lost – World Cup encounter.

The negative commentary didn’t radicalised the head coach’s thinking as he made just a single XV change for Argentina, Robbie Henshaw producing an impressive first half to very much justify his inclusion at the expense of Bundee Aki.

Farrell had admitted that some players were lucky to keep their place… and he wasn’t giving them a free pass post this second match of the series, claiming the improvement he wanted to see only came “in parts” and he also described Ireland as “lethargic”.

They definitely haven’t collectively clicked but one aspect that couldn’t be faulted, unlike last weekend, was the bench. Whereas multiple errors from replacements painfully wounded the team last weekend, there was more impact this time around.

With so much outside interest focused on the future, the 21-year-old Sam Prendergast demanded attention on his debut with his 62nd-minute introduction. However, we were more taken by the influence wielded by Thomas Clarkson, the 24-year-old debuting as sub tighthead.

His five-minute first-half cameo with Bealham in the sin bin augured well for his lengthier return on 53 minutes and his scrum penalty win 12 minutes later was quite the fillip for a rookie who should now start against Fiji to accelerate his experience.

Durable young Irish props are elusive, but Clarkson has given reason for optimism.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
D
DP 32 days ago

So does this victory push Ireland back to the top of the pile?

E
Ed the Duck 32 days ago

Ireland can’t stop the rot and get off the naughty step, at least not without massively impacting their performance levels even further. The way they constantly live on the offside line, more often off than on, combined with the way they cynically seal off at rucks is now beginning, at long last, to get pinged to a greater degree. There’s still a bit to go but at least the refs have made a start recently, any coincidence this is post Sexton…?!!


And while they’re at it, can the refs start dealing with their constant player moving prominently in the eye line of the kicker at every opportunity. It’s just poor sportsmanship!!!

T
TI 28 days ago

Mate, I’m no fan of Ireland, but pretty much every international team is constantly off side.

If the refs were to officiate offsides strictly, there’d be 20-some offside penalties per team in every international test.

Instead, offside has become the new forward pass. If it doesn’t fly 30 degrees forward, it’s “flat”. The same with offside: it it’s not a yard and a half offside, it’s on side.

The refs are generally poor at catching even the most egregious offsides (especially Nika Amashukeli, I’ve noticed - he barely officiates offsides), so if the linesmen are asleep, the game can get wild. In those cases, it’s about which team notices this ref weakness first, and abuses it more.

But trust me, EVERY team is trying to get an advantage there if they can get away with it.

R
RedWarrior 31 days ago

Yawn.

D
DC000 32 days ago

Lad, you spew some utter shite. You must be yet another SH thicko. The ignorance you display is spectacular!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about trying to make so the worst teams in it are not giving up when they are so far off the pace that we get really bad scorelines (when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together). I know it's not realistic to think those same exact teams are going to be competitive with a different model but I am inclined to think more competitive teams make it in with another modem. It's a catch 22 of course, you want teams to fight to be there next year, but they don't want to be there next year when theres less interest in it because the results are less interesting than league ones. If you ensure the best 20 possible make it somehow (say currently) each year they quickly change focus when things aren't going well enough and again interest dies. Will you're approach gradually work overtime? With the approach of the French league were a top 6 mega rich Premier League type club system might develop, maybe it will? But what of a model like Englands were its fairly competitive top 8 but orders or performances can jump around quite easily one year to the next? If the England sides are strong comparatively to the rest do they still remain in EPCR despite not consistently dominating in their own league?


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 5 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search