Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Four issues England must address before facing the All Blacks again

George Martin of England looks dejected following the International Test Match between New Zealand All Blacks and England at Forsyth Barr Stadium on July 06, 2024 in Dunedin, New Zealand. (Photo by Joe Allison - RFU/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

In a contest as close as England’s with the All Blacks on Saturday, there is no need for Steve Borthwick to throw out the playbook following a 16-15 defeat. 

ADVERTISEMENT

There were many positives that England’s head coach can take into their second Test at Eden Park on Saturday. With that said, there were some red flags.

England captain Jamie George vowed after the match “We’ll do a lot of honest work this week and make sure we go to Eden Park fully prepared. We’ll learn and we’ll grow and we’ll get better.”

Video Spacer

Steve Borthwick impressed by young England side in tight All Blacks loss | Steinlager Series

Video Spacer

Steve Borthwick impressed by young England side in tight All Blacks loss | Steinlager Series

England’s attacking transformation between their loss to Scotland and win over Ireland in the Six Nations this year proves how quickly a team can smooth out any concerns, and Borthwick will be hoping for a similar level of growth this week in some areas.

Some things can be fixed in a matter of a couple of sessions, while some may be slightly more deep-rooted. Here are four:

Match Summary

4
Penalty Goals
1
2
Tries
2
1
Conversions
2
0
Drop Goals
0
93
Carries
108
8
Line Breaks
5
14
Turnovers Lost
10
5
Turnovers Won
2

Goal kicking
Almost every kicker has an off-day with the boot from time to time, but when your predecessor was the seemingly metronomic Owen Farrell, you are likely to be judged by the standards set by Test rugby’s second-highest point scorer.

That’s the problem that Marcus Smith faces, as does George Ford and Fin Smith. No matter how well he played against the All Blacks, taking the ball to the line in a way the soon-to-be-Racing 92 flyhalf cannot, the performance of most No.10s will ultimately come down to the brass tacks of how well they kicked.

ADVERTISEMENT

A record of two from five is not up to scratch at Test rugby, and worse still, the manner of the misses is all the more alarming. While Smith’s missed conversion for Immanuel Feyi-Waboso’s try was forgivable, his penalty misses in the opening minutes of the first and second half were less so. In a game that was decided by a solitary point, the importance of those wayward kicks is magnified.

The positive for England and the Harlequin is that this issue could simply have been a bad day at the office. After all, Handre Pollard was not much better from the tee against Ireland later that day, but Rassie Erasmus nor the Springbok will be particularly phased.

Smith will no doubt be assiduously labouring away on the training paddock to make sure that display was just a minor blip, but if there are early signs of creaking again, Borthwick may have to act swiftly.

Bench boost
A feature of Borthwick’s tenure as England boss so far is that he likes to make early substitutions in the second half, chiefly in the pack. Not once during the Six Nations did the starting front row see the 55th minute as a collective, for instance. Saturday was no different.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now there is a welter of statistics that drive the decision-making process regarding substitutions that we outside the England camp are not exposed to, but surely the old-fashioned eye test still has some credence.

Chandler Cunningham-South in no way looked like a player that needed to be taken off on Saturday. He began his second half by smashing into Stephen Perofeta before carving his way through the All Blacks’ defence in the build-up to Feyi-Waboso’s try. That followed a first half where he had a hand in Maro Itoje’s try. His match came to an end after only 50 minutes, however.

There was a tactical justification for removing the flanker, but it did not pay off, nor did any other changes in truth. In contrast, the bulk of Scott Robertson’s alterations seemed to boost his side, which helps explain why the hosts were able to control the final ten minutes of the match.

There is always an element of risk to making changes as, even if a team is struggling, the devil you know is sometimes better than the devil you don’t. While every coach dreams of their bench making the kind of impact South Africa’s Bomb Squad did against Ireland, on this occasion England’s failed to provide a spark.

This is something that can theoretically be remedied in a week, but may come with time and experience for Borthwick.

Support
Neither England nor the All Blacks were particularly efficient at keeping hold of the ball for long stretches. While both sides found ways to cough up possession in a variety of ways, a reliable source of turnovers for the All Blacks came from targeting isolated English runners.

Scott Barrett and co were able to sniff out any instance where an Englishman was taking the ball into contact without a cavalry ruck-hitters to secure possession, and they duly punished them.

Tom Curry was therefore brought on to provide a touch more dynamism to the pack at the expense of the high-flying Cunningham-South. The ‘Kamikazee Kids’ duo with Sam Underhill had proven to be fruitful in the past against the All Blacks, and Borthwick was hoping for something similar.

Bizarrely, this move worked out too well as Curry conceded a penalty within minutes of coming on for diving straight over at a ruck after latching onto George Martin as the Leicester Tigers lock took the ball into contact.

Borthwick clearly identified this issue in-match, and while he was not wholly successful in finding a solution, he has all week to do so now.

The obvious answer is a change in personnel, but, as seen in Dunedin, that will come at a price in other departments of the game, as shown with Cunningham-South’s departure. But England’s starting set of forwards were not exactly lacking in speed, so it may well be a case of sticking with what they have (albeit with an enforced change) and tightening up any loose bolts heading to Auckland.

Related

Scrum time
The phrase ‘no scrum, no win’ exists for a reason. England have had worse days at the scrum in recent memory, but this was still not a great day for England’s forwards in that department.

Borthwick’s front row did enjoy some success, but the All Blacks got the upper hand in the final quarter, which contributed to them being able to close the game out.

The visitors were not helped by losing all 95 caps-worth of experience in Joe Marler in the opening stages, with the uncapped Fin Baxter being thrown in at the deep end. Things will not get much better with Marler now ruled out of the second Test.

George highlighted this as an area to work on after the match, and though tough, it seems do-able for Borthwick and his coaching team. After all, this was not a demolition job by the All Blacks.

England tighthead Kyle Sinckler was keen to stress how such issues can be resolved in the space of a week.

“The scrum, they will be disappointed with the outcome,” Sinckler said as a pundit for Sky Sports. “But when it comes to the scrum, it’s just tiny little adjustments and they can fix that in a week and obviously, working with Tom Harrison, they’ve got massive experience in that front row so I believe they can fix that in a week.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

34 Comments
N
Nickers 162 days ago

The ABs let England into the game with some very poor tactics. All the steam is taken out of rush defence by simply kicking the ball instead of running it. ABs can do that with even more comfort this week without worrying about Furbank running it back.

If DMac can show some discipline and only look to go wide when England have too many forwards on the ground they can win comfortably. If they resort to the Super Rugby inspired madness of last week’s first half they will be looking at their first loss at Eden Park for 30 years. You would think a brand new ABs team that has only been together 10 days with a new coach has more potential to improve than England from one week to the next, but if the ABs end up chasing the game against that England D things could go pear shaped.

S
Shaylen 166 days ago

England need another 10 tests to really become the finished product they are after. The point is they are making progress week in and week out and they are only getting better. Expect an improvement from both teams this week and with the margins so tight its really about who improves more. First 20mins will be vital and England need to do their best to maintain parity in those moments. If they can take a lead into half time and find more impact in the second half than last week then they will win. Expect the AB’s to be about 10% better than last week so will be really difficult.

P
Paul 166 days ago

A Great TEST Match. English Very strong. Good enough to
beat any team in the World on
Saturday. All blacks only really
Dominated the match in the last 5 minutes
Thanks to a miss kick to the back field by B.B. But All Blacks will be a lot better this week.
Bad luck England

J
Jmann 166 days ago

I’ve actually really enjoyed watching England play since the world cup. Borthwick has them playing decent English rugby. They should have made the final of RWC2023 (but they just couldn’t get enough impact from their bench). Eden park will a great test for them to see if they can hold their nerve. Just like the Bok they play a brand that is poison to NZ rugby and I imagine given enough games it will (just like the Bok) win them 2 out of 5 games against the ABs. It’ll be a fascinating watch. IF NZ can unpick the defence it will be over by the 50 minute mark. But England’s defence seems unbending so I’m picking a close game that could go either way. Nic Berry is ref so that means hands all over the ruck will be ok and the scrums will be a lottery.

T
Toaster 166 days ago

There’s an awful lot of what England must do and what went wrong on here

There’s a lot that the ABs need to do too

I see Brian Moore losing it over scrums

T
Tom 166 days ago

Our bench strategy was dodgy. Took off players still playing well and replaced them unnecessarily with lesser players that killed our tempo namely, Chandler, Mitchell, Smith. This cost us the world cup semi final when we could have kept our starting props on. There is of course merit to bringing on fresh blood at 55 but that assumes the players coming off the bench are nearly as good. In key positions for England, they are not. Fin Baxter managed to play for nearly the entire match, surely Chandler and Mitchell could do another few mins and I don't ever see the point of subbing your fly half unless you're losing badly or the game is in the bag. Marcus should stay on. Fin Smith is a great kid who may be an England legend one day but at the moment, he's not making any impact.

B
Bull Shark 166 days ago

On the topic of scrums - England’s front row is nothing special. I’d like to see some new fresh faces emerging sooner rather than later.

As the no.5 team in the world, England is only really capable of building to another WC campaign in 2027. And maybe a 6 Nations shot next year or so (although you can’t see this England team consistently beating Ireland or France) - so I’m not sure why we’re (I’m) not seeing any new talent in the tight five worth writing home about. The old guard is well Past or approaching past their prime. Which is why a messy NZ still pipped them to the post.

The fact that England is clearly unearthing some excellent loose forwards - they’re going to be hamstrung by this old tight five as time goes by. We’ve got some fancy looking bits and bobs on an old engine.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 21 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search