Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Laporte explains why France said 'non' to a foreign coach

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

FFR President Bernard Laporte will have to look closer to home to find the next coach of France, after clubs rejected the idea of a foreigner taking the job.

ADVERTISEMENT

Just over half of the 1,800 clubs (51%) in France affiliated to the FFR took part in the organisation’s first-ever email referendum on whether France should hire an overseas coach to take over from Jacques Brunel in 2020.

A total 59% of respondants said they wanted the next national team coach to be French, the FFR confirmed on Friday morning.

In a statement confirming the result, Laporte said: “It is important for me to give the clubs the opportunity to speak. Over the past two years, the FFR has taken a turning point in its democratisation. We have set up direct democracy and referendums to involve clubs in important decisions.

“The XV de France belongs first and foremost to the amateur rugby clubs that train our future international players.

“The preparation of the 2023 World Cup, which we are proud to have won in France, is a great opportunity to involve them in the choice of the future coach.

“The question of the French or foreign nationality of the coach of the XV of France is sometimes a debate for insiders and enthusiasts. To define this orientation, 59% of clubs did not want a foreign coach.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I welcome this democratic decision and, of course, I will respect that choice. We can move forward calmly to build the necessary conditions with the objective of winning the World Cup in 2023.”

The decision has brought a halt to discussions with a number of coaches. Laporte had previously revealed he had spoken to ‘the top five coaches in the world’ to discuss the soon-to-be-vacant position in the Marcoussis hotseat.

Wales coach Warren Gatland’s name repeatedly cropped up in articles, as pundits installed him as favourite for the job. Jon Mitchell and Sir Clive Woodward – who had unsuccessfully applied for the job in 2015 – were also mentioned, as were Joe Schmidt and Vern Cotter.

He also recently promised he would appoint Brunel’s successor before the World Cup in Japan kicked off. “We have agreed that we have to switch quickly to the 2023 World Cup [cycle] in France,” he said in an interview with Le Progrès.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The next coach will be appointed before the 2019 World Cup. Because the guys I want, if I’m not the one who gets them signed, others will. So we’ll have to move fast.”

But, as the vote revealed, there was widespread hostility to the notion of France hiring its first overseas coach.

Fabien Pelous, the former Toulouse and France lock, was quick to condemn the idea. “Once again, we will try to copy others instead of being proud of who we are,” he told Le Parisien, describing it as, “a snub for some talented technicians who do excellent work in their respective clubs, such as the team of Laurent Travers and Laurent Labit, Ugo Mola or Franck Azema.”

Watch: Rugby Explorer – South Africa

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search