Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

France rue 'lack of killer instinct' after loss to Canada

Morgane Bourgeois of France with ball in hand. Photo by Fiona Goodall - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images

A “lack of killer instinct” is how France co-coach David Ortiz is describing his side’s 29-20 loss to Canada at Go Media Mt Smart Stadium in Auckland.

ADVERTISEMENT

After a stunning upset of world champions New Zealand in their opening match, France ended their WXV 1 campaign with two losses, but Ortiz and fellow coach Gaëlle Mignot can see the positives of their time in New Zealand.

“There are certainly some elements of frustration and disappointment with this final result,” said Mignot.

Video Spacer

Canada’s stars react to their win over France

Video Spacer

Canada’s stars react to their win over France

“This is not exactly what we wanted during this tournament, but we were able to draw some results, some conclusions to see how we can improve for the future, to make things work better for us. But yes, definitely some feelings of disappointment.”

Ortiz paid tribute to the tough Canadian effort. This was France’s fifth loss to Canada in their last five meetings despite leading 10-0 after as many minutes and dominating territory and possession for much of the first half.

“Yes, I think that we started off with a lot of efficiency,” he said.

“But we lost this efficiency after those initial 20 minutes, that happened because we are able to keep the ball at length, like we can keep it for a long time and we can keep the momentum coming. But after a while we lost this momentum and we got tired. And this is when the Canadians were able to pick up and take it from there.

“I think we need to have a more of a killer instinct sometimes, and these are critical moments. And we lacked a little bit of pragmatism, I think, and this is where the Canadians were able to pick up.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

One bright spot for the French was the performance of scrum-half Pauline Bourdon Sansus, with the veteran dictating play with sharp passing and a number of incisive runs from the ruck.

“Pauline is a very strong player and she’s a reflection of the team, actually,” said Mignot.

“She’s an amazing person and very strong within the team and she brings a very strong rhythm overall. And I think that within the match she brings a lot of good qualities, but she’s equal to all of the other players. There’s this element of being equal, and I think that we also work collectively as a whole.”

Bourdon Sansus herself was reflective of the French WXV campaign in a positive way, noting that the team was in a rebuilding phase.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We work collectively and we work towards a certain goal and we learn,” she said.

“And it’s also been a long time since we didn’t have matches against this type of nations. So, you know, we have lots to learn. And we will go back to France and we will work and we’ll try to get better.”

Bourdon Sansus said that the result wouldn’t stop the French side celebrating their time together in New Zealand.

“It’s not the result that we wanted. That is true. However, this is a very fun, enjoyable competition that we are having. And I think that, yes, we’re going to go out, have some drinks, celebrate life, because these are life moments no matter what happens. And I think it’s good to cheer all together, have some drinks and celebrate.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 22 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search