Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

France vs Wales is ON after Top 14 clubs agree compromise deal for 6-match window

(Photo by Anne-Christine Poujoulat/AFP via Getty Images)

Administrators in France have finally reached a compromise, the FFR and Top 14 clubs agreeing that a six-match Test window can start with the October 24 Paris friendly against Wales.

ADVERTISEMENT

A three-match, four-week window was all the Top 14 clubs had agreed to prior to Thursday’s decision in France. It came after a Council of State ruling on the matter insisted the FFR and Ligue Nationale de Rugby must find common ground.

France have six matches on their schedule, the opener against Wales followed by the Six Nations game with Ireland and then four Autumn Nations Cup games.   

Video Spacer

Dylan Hartley and Jamie Roberts preview the Champions Cup final on RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

Dylan Hartley and Jamie Roberts preview the Champions Cup final on RugbyPass Offload

A statement from the LNR outlining the terms of its agreement with the FFR read: “During this international period of autumn 2020, the same player can only be registered on a maximum of three matchsheets.

“The players will be made available as follows in this exceptional autumn window: Before each match, 31 players will be selected by the FFR as of Sunday evening (or Monday morning if the player plays a match with his club on Sunday).

“Among these 31 players, 28 players will be retained by the FFR at the choice of the coach of the French team.

“The other three players will be made available to their club on Wednesday evening if the club plays a match on Friday evening, or on Thursday afternoon if their club plays a match on Saturday/Sunday or does not play a match.

ADVERTISEMENT

During the week of November 2 to 8, after which the French team does not play a match, 28 players will be made available from Thursday, November 5, until Sunday, November 8.

“This amendment to the agreement will be submitted to the steering committees of the LNR and FFR for approval.

“It constitutes a balanced and united agreement which takes into account, on the one hand, the health issues of the players, on the other hand, the sporting and economic issues for the French team, the FFR, the LNR and the clubs in the exceptional context of the health crisis.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
AllyOz 23 hours ago
Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?

I will preface this comment by saying that I hope Joe Schmidt continues for as long as he can as I think he has done a tremendous job to date. He has, in some ways, made the job a little harder for himself by initially relying on domestic based players and never really going over the top with OS based players even when he relaxed his policy a little more. I really enjoy how the team are playing at the moment.


I think Les Kiss, because (1) he has a bit more international experience, (2) has previously coached with Schmidt and in the same setup as Schmidt, might provide the smoothest transition, though I am not sure that this necessarily needs to be the case.


I would say one thing though about OS versus local coaches. I have a preference for local coaches but not for the reason that people might suppose (certainly not for the reason OJohn will have opined - I haven't read all the way down but I think I can guess it).


Australia has produced coaches of international standing who have won World Cups and major trophies. Bob Dwyer, Rod Macqueen, Alan Jones, Michael Cheika and Eddie Jones. I would add John Connolly - though he never got the international success he was highly successful with Queensland against quality NZ opposition and I think you could argue, never really got the run at international level that others did (OJohn might agree with that bit). Some of those are controversial but they all achieved high level results. You can add to that a number of assistants who worked OS at a high level.


But what the lack of a clear Australian coach suggests to me is that we are no longer producing coaches of international quality through our systems. We have had some overseas based coaches in our system like Thorn and Wessels and Cron (though I would suggest Thorn was a unique case who played for Australia in one code and NZ in the other and saw himself as a both a NZer and a Queenslander having arrived here at around age 12). Cron was developed in the Australian system anyway, so I don't have a problem with where he was born.


But my point is that we used to have systems in Australia that produced world class coaches. The systems developed by Dick Marks, which adopted and adapted some of the best coaching training approaches at the time from around the world (Wales particularly) but focussed on training Australian coaches with the best available methods, in my mind (as someone who grew up and began coaching late in that era) was a key part of what produced the highly skilled players that we produced at the time and also that produced those world class coaches. I think it was slipping already by the time I did my Level II certificate in 2002 and I think Eddie Jones influence and the priorities of the executive, particularly John O'Neill, might have been the beginning of the end. But if we have good coaching development programmes at school and junior level that will feed through to representative level then we will have


I think this is the missing ingredient that both ourselves and, ironically, Wales (who gave us the bones of our coaching system that became world leading), is a poor coaching development system. Fix that and you start getting players developing basic skills better and earlier in their careers and this feeds through all the way through the system and it also means that, when coaching positions at all levels come up, there are people of quality to fill them, who feed through the system all the way to the top. We could be exporting more coaches to Japan and England and France and the UK and the USA, as we have done a bit in the past.


A lack of a third tier between SR and Club rugby might block this a little - but I am not sure that this alone is the reason - it does give people some opportunity though to be noticed and play a key role in developing that next generation of players coming through. And we have never been able to make the cost sustainable.


I don't think it matters that we have an OS coach as our head coach at the moment but I think it does tell us something about overall rugby ecosystem that, when a coaching appointment comes up, we don't have 3 or 4 high quality options ready to take over. The failure of our coaching development pathway is a key missing ingredient for me and one of the reasons our systems are failing.

131 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Gaston Mieres: 'Rugby has been an addiction - a good one' Gaston Mieres: 'Rugby has been an addiction - a good one'
Search