Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Frank Murphy, why didn't you check it?' The Rugby Pod on the refereeing decision that saved 'chokers' Clermont at Wasps

(Photo by Thierry Zoccolan/AFP via Getty Images)

Ex-Wasps out-half Andy Goode has explained his upset at seeing his former club nudged out of the Heineken Champions Cup at the round of 16 stage by Clermont, a team which Jim Hamilton, his Rugby Pod co-host, still feels don’t look like they have shaken off the chokers tag they have been synonymous with over the years in Europe.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Wasps appeared set to progress to a quarter-final meeting versus Toulouse after an out-of-sorts Clermont struggled in the knockout stage match at the Ricoh Arena. 

Lee Blackett’s side came into the fixture on the back of a poor Gallagher Premiership run but they lifted their efforts and were only denied by an added time converted try which Goode insisted shouldn’t have been awarded.  

Video Spacer

Devin Toner on freak athlete second rows

Video Spacer

Devin Toner on freak athlete second rows

The ex-England out-half claimed there was a forward pass in the build-up to the decisive 84th-minute try by Kotaro Matsushima that was converted by Camille Lopez for the 27-25 result. However, while Clermont may have advanced on this occasion to the next round, ex-Saracens lock Hamilton doesn’t believe they will be crowned champions in May as their old failings are still evident. Here is how the duo’s Wasps-Clermont Champions Cup review unfolded on the latest episode of The Rugby Pod:    

JIM HAMILTON: To be fair they [Wasps] did almost beat one of the best teams in terms of Clermont. I don’t want to be horrible, but they [Wasps] put in a good shift.  

ANDY GOODE: They did and Clermont, I was a bit nervous about Clermont putting a decent whack on Wasps this weekend but it shows how little we know about rugby sometimes because Wasps should have won it and you look back over the game and there were a few talking points. (Matteo) Minozzi would have scored a worldie of a try if he had just held it close to his chest instead of putting it down, that would have put them 14-0 up. 

And then Wasps’ discipline has been a running theme throughout the year really. Their discipline towards the back end of the game, they gave away two stupid penalties when they were five points up with about two minutes to play. They were in Clermont’s half as well, just no need for it. They had been eager defensively throughout the game. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Listen, Clermont had threats all over the park and they defended for the most part exceptionally well, played with an intensity that has been lacking in other games. But the big thing for me and the annoying thing – and I love Frank Murphy, played with him at Leicester and he is a really good referee – and I question why Wasps didn’t make a bigger scene of it, the try that Matsushima scored was the winning try, one phase before Morgan Parra has passed it three yards forward to Fritz Lee. It was so forward. 

JH: It was flat.

AG: Mate, it was definitely forward but it didn’t get checked, Maybe the Wasps boys were completely out on their feet, maybe no one realised it was a forward pass, I was just disappointed that didn’t get checked. But Wasps, they have just lost with a clutch kick from Camille Lopez and a lot of people think he looks like me a little bit, a slightly overweight fly-half that is either sometimes really bad or sometimes okay. 

JH: I don’t think he will be happy with that, I don’t think he will see that as a compliment.

AG: He slots the kick to win it and it’s just heart-breaking for Wasps. Clermont are a powerhouse but again, as we have seen many times and Jim you have been of those Saracens teams that dusted Clermont when perhaps people would have thought they would be a lot better, they have got the big choke in them and I thought this was going to be their choke so maybe this is their year. 

ADVERTISEMENT

I don’t think it is but they had a big choke in them. It was like Clermont rocked up expecting they would just walk the game because Wasps weren’t in great form but they snuck over the line at the end even though it was a forward pass from Morgan Para to Fritz Lee about three yards forward. Frank Murphy, why didn’t you check it?     

JH: Because it was flat. The thing about Clermont and listening to Benjamin Kayser and having played against Clermont as well, when I realised how much they struggle mentally with the Champions Cup or the Challenge Cup is when they won the Challenge Cup a couple of years ago and the celebrations around winning the Challenge Cup, I don’t want to be horrible to the Challenge Cup but I am thinking from a Clermont perspective, they are a team you think should win Europe and you could see, I think Kayser was crying, he was speaking after the game and the emotion around it and it shows that there is clearly a mental block with Clermont.  

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search