Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Fresh England bench excites fans despite drop in experience from 160 caps to just 41

(Photo by Alex Davidson/Getty Images)

After their warm-up match against the Barbarians was cancelled last week, it is understandable why Eddie Jones has refrained from being too experimental with his starting England XV for the decisive Guinness Six Nations clash with Italy this Saturday, the coach instead largely keeping player inexperience confined to the bench.

ADVERTISEMENT

There are some noticeable XV tweaks when accounting for injuries to regulars like Courtney Lawes, George Ford, Manu Tuilagi and Elliot Daly, but the team is full of familiar faces. 

In the absence of Lawes and the Japan-bound George Kruis, Exeter Chiefs’ Jonny Hill is the only uncapped starter, which is richly deserved. Elsewhere, moving Henry Slade to inside centre and starting the two-cap George Furbank are decisions that may have been unexpected. 

Video Spacer

England boss Eddie Jones explains his selection to face Italy

Video Spacer

England boss Eddie Jones explains his selection to face Italy

But Jones has shown faith in Furbank, whose first two caps against France and Scotland in this year’s championship were a grim introduction to Test rugby. The 24-year-old has now been backed to show what he is really capable of in more favourable conditions. 

While there are seven changes to the starting XV from last March, it is the England bench where Jones and his coaching team have taken a more radical approach. The ‘Finishers’ consist of three uncapped players, Tom Dunn, Ollie Lawrence and Ollie Thorley, and only two players with more than ten caps, Ellis Genge (18) and Charlie Ewels (15). Will Stuart and Ben Earl only have three caps each and Dan Robson two – a grand bench total of 41 caps. 

Yet, while the replacements bench may not be steeped in experience, the potential of the eight players has been much-discussed online since the England team was announced on Thursday morning. Of all the replacements, it is Lawrence and Thorley that have attracted the most attention. With the power the 21-year-old Worcester Warriors centre possesses, he looks to be a natural replacement – and long-term successor – to Tuilagi in the midfield. 

Meanwhile, Gloucester’s Thorley has been the subject of a two-year campaign by many fans calling for him to earn his first cap. If anything, there is still disappointment that he is not starting.  

ADVERTISEMENT

The divide between the starting XV and the bench seems to be one of experience and form. That is not to say that none of the starting XV is in form, but the ‘Finishers’ seem to be those that have caught the eye since English club rugby’s restart in August and although some may warrant a starting berth based on the last few months, Jones has turned to those he trusts given the lack of Test preparation. 

When comparing this bench for Rome to the 160-cap ensemble that faced Wales as replacements in the final match of the Six Nations before the Covid-19 break, Ellis Genge, Will Stuart, Charlie Ewels and Ben Earl feature in both. 

Stylistically, and at this stage of their Test careers, both Genge and Earl perfectly suit the role of impact players. But the most noticeable difference is that the Matt Proudfoot-inspired 6/2 forwards/backs split that was a popular option earlier this year has been replaced by a more conventional 5/3 split. 

Moreover, with Slade and Furbank in the starting XV, a replacement fly-half has not even been chosen on the bench, affording Jones the opportunity to pick both Lawrence and Thorley. In a game where amassing points may be crucial to England’s chances of winning the championship, having those two – as well as Robson – as the backline replacements has promise. 

ADVERTISEMENT

In terms of players who are at their peak currently, Jack Willis’ name has been mentioned a lot as someone who has missed out. Although he is arguably the most in-form player in the 36-man autumn squad, Jones can be forgiven for offering him a rest after the Gallagher Premiership final last weekend knowing there is plenty more Test action to come next month. 

https://twitter.com/NOpenside/status/1321773857158647808?s=20

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

286 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tupou Vaa'i gives first impression of 'big unit' Fabian Holland Tupou Vaa'i on 'big unit' Fabian Holland
Search