Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Gaëlle Mignot: 'We're not hiding behind this victory'

LANGLEY, BRITISH COLUMBIA - OCTOBER 05: Lina Queyroi of France runs with the ball whilst under pressure from Kate Zackary of the United States during the WXV 1 Pool match between USA and France at Langley Events Center on October 05, 2024 in Langley, British Columbia. (Photo by Rich Lam - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

It had been a while since the French coaching staff were seen smiling on the pitch after a match, sharing light-hearted moments with the players. The victory over USA (14-22) on Saturday, October 5, at the Langley Events Centre, brought a much-needed boost to the French team.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since their last win against Wales during the Women’s Six Nations on April 21, Les Bleues had endured a tough period, suffering three defeats in six months: twice to England and once to Canada just the week before. This win was a welcomed relief after such a challenging stretch.

Fixture
WXV 1
USA Womens
14 - 22
Full-time
France Womens
All Stats and Data

“Today, our main objective has been achieved,” co-selector David Ortiz admitted with a sigh of relief. “We’ve managed to improve in areas where we faltered last week, and that’s important because it reflects the core spirit of the group. We needed to tighten up on those things. We’re satisfied, but we know there’s still a lot to work on. This is just the first step that will help us keep building.”

Co-captain Marine Ménager echoed this sentiment, adding, “We were able to focus a bit more on our individual performances, which was lacking last week. Post-match discussions are always easier after a win. We defended really well and wanted to show a different side of ourselves after last weekend.”

A little nervous at the start

However, the French side struggled to find their rhythm in the early stages of the game, showing an unusual level of nervousness. The first 15 minutes were marked by sloppy passing and several handling errors, with dropped balls disrupting their flow and preventing them from settling into their game plan.

Points Flow Chart

France Womens win +8
Time in lead
0
Mins in lead
74
0%
% Of Game In Lead
90%
89%
Possession Last 10 min
11%
7
Points Last 10 min
0

“The little bit of nervousness was partly due to the previous weekend’s performance. It had an impact on us,” admits Marine Ménager. “Maybe we needed to reassure ourselves about the start of the match, which we didn’t manage to do.

“Despite those dropped balls, we wanted to stick to our DNA, which is to play and take offloads. We didn’t want to cheat, just respect our mindset. I’m very proud of the group. When we’re a little less confident, on the first few balls, we’re more exposed to dropped balls or weaker connections than usual. This match will do us good and help us regain our self-confidence.”

The staff feel that this lack of confidence, like the frequent clumsiness, is one of the points that needs to be corrected quickly. “Overall, let’s face it, it was a mixed game on a number of levels,” says David Ortiz.

ADVERTISEMENT

Set Plays

9
Scrums
9
100%
Scrum Win %
67%
17
Lineout
11
82%
Lineout Win %
82%
2
Restarts Received
5
100%
Restarts Received Win %
60%

“We were quite pleased with our defence and conquest. But we lacked precision in attack. It’s still our DNA, our project, and everyone is part of it. We can still improve on certain details.

“We need to get our heads together, find our automatisms and finish passing these balls. We’ve created some opportunities to score, but now we need to finish the moves and make sure that we score more quickly.”

“Not everything is perfect yet,” continues Gaëlle Mignot. “Our kicking game is also a reflection of what we’ve been doing: there are times when there’s a bit of slagging and things don’t work. We’re not hiding behind this victory. We wanted to put a smile back on our faces with victory, but today we still have a lot of work to do.”

Match Summary

0
Penalty Goals
1
2
Tries
3
2
Conversions
2
0
Drop Goals
0
174
Carries
114
3
Line Breaks
6
14
Turnovers Lost
16
7
Turnovers Won
6
ADVERTISEMENT

Another example that corroborates the first observations. After a good first half in terms of discipline, Les Bleues gradually lost their way, getting into a number of errors, but without conceding a card.

“We went into the break with two errors, and that’s an area we’d targeted and focused on. We wanted to play a full match with 15 players,” confirms Gaëlle Mignot.

“Indiscipline had been costing us dearly in the form of cards for a number of games, and that was something we took for granted. At one point, in the last 20 minutes, the USA girls got back into the rhythm of the match and made progress. And that lead led to errors. We need to be able to manage these key moments of the match better if we’re going to be able to follow up these great performances.”

Looking ahead, the upcoming week promises excitement with the highly anticipated match against the Black Ferns.

The Women's Rugby World Cup 2025 is coming to England. Click here to buy tickets.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Nigel Owens' verdict on the 20-minute red card trial

Alright, to his credit he did have something to say after that..

“As far as the 20-minute red card idea is concerned, I’m not a fan. As Mathieu has said, I don’t believe it will really solve any of the problems that we have in the game at the moment.

So we might as well start here, which I'm assume was the topic he started with as well. The only reason 20min rec cards were brought in was to make the game fairer, a problem highlighted by their recent frequency.


A player, and team, should receive the same punishment for a particular foul, no matter what. Red cards (as they were) don't achieve that as the punishment is purely dependent and what stage of the game it is (if you think a punishment has an effect on the frequency of offenses, ask yourself if you've noticed more people committing red card offences towards the ends of game). So a team who receives a red card in the first minute of the game, is overly punished and that is obviously going to be the case for the viewers as well. That is the problem a fixed length red card 'solves'.


Now, onto the other topics he raises..

“They should not be seen as red card offences in the first place – so do we need to change the laws instead?

They're not!!!! They are now seen as 20min red card offences. Here at least, you could still be given a straight red no replacement card on the field for 'thuggery'. This is the law change you're asking for!

Too often, players are still not making the effort to go lower.

Going lower is the cause of these problems. There is nothing wrong with upright tackles, they are safe. Shoulder charging and swinging arms are long out of the game Nigel!

if you have been sent off, you have done something reckless that has put another player at great risk

No, not necessarily. But in the few cases where they were, that punishment is for the player. Not the team. You can be sent off for receiving a 'team' yellow, this is a case were the rule should directly be rectified however. It's outside this discussion.

A red card means you deserve to be off the pitch, so I don’t see why there should be a middle ground.

There is still a lot of careless, reckless conduct out there, so I don’t know if introducing these new cards has made much of a difference anyway.”

I don't recall any careless or reckless behaviour, not at least in TRC, what is he referring to? What we did just see was the game last week be saved by the 20min RC rule. We had what Nigel is describing as an accidental head collision which saw Argentina receive a read card (must have been very close to yellow). Normally that would have destroyed the game (and it did for that period), but by returning to 15 players it was still able to be a contest, which Opta suggests would normally have had just a 7 point gap between the teams. This is why there is a middle ground (what you have been saying you want!!).

do we need to change the laws instead?

Back to his poorly made point. I would suggest bigger off field penalties that are far more involved that a 'tackling' school, and obviously not just for the player, the whole team, especially the coachs, needed to be doing the penance. A definite review to team based yellow cards and how infringement sequences can be better handled is required as well.

8 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Borthwick names 36-man squad for next week's England training camp Borthwick names 36-man squad for next week's England training camp
Search