Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Gaëlle Mignot: 'We're not hiding behind this victory'

LANGLEY, BRITISH COLUMBIA - OCTOBER 05: Lina Queyroi of France runs with the ball whilst under pressure from Kate Zackary of the United States during the WXV 1 Pool match between USA and France at Langley Events Center on October 05, 2024 in Langley, British Columbia. (Photo by Rich Lam - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

It had been a while since the French coaching staff were seen smiling on the pitch after a match, sharing light-hearted moments with the players. The victory over USA (14-22) on Saturday, October 5, at the Langley Events Centre, brought a much-needed boost to the French team.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since their last win against Wales during the Women’s Six Nations on April 21, Les Bleues had endured a tough period, suffering three defeats in six months: twice to England and once to Canada just the week before. This win was a welcomed relief after such a challenging stretch.

Fixture
WXV 1
USA Womens
14 - 22
Full-time
France Womens
All Stats and Data

“Today, our main objective has been achieved,” co-selector David Ortiz admitted with a sigh of relief. “We’ve managed to improve in areas where we faltered last week, and that’s important because it reflects the core spirit of the group. We needed to tighten up on those things. We’re satisfied, but we know there’s still a lot to work on. This is just the first step that will help us keep building.”

Co-captain Marine Ménager echoed this sentiment, adding, “We were able to focus a bit more on our individual performances, which was lacking last week. Post-match discussions are always easier after a win. We defended really well and wanted to show a different side of ourselves after last weekend.”

A little nervous at the start

However, the French side struggled to find their rhythm in the early stages of the game, showing an unusual level of nervousness. The first 15 minutes were marked by sloppy passing and several handling errors, with dropped balls disrupting their flow and preventing them from settling into their game plan.

Points Flow Chart

France Womens win +8
Time in lead
0
Mins in lead
74
0%
% Of Game In Lead
90%
88%
Possession Last 10 min
12%
7
Points Last 10 min
0

“The little bit of nervousness was partly due to the previous weekend’s performance. It had an impact on us,” admits Marine Ménager. “Maybe we needed to reassure ourselves about the start of the match, which we didn’t manage to do.

“Despite those dropped balls, we wanted to stick to our DNA, which is to play and take offloads. We didn’t want to cheat, just respect our mindset. I’m very proud of the group. When we’re a little less confident, on the first few balls, we’re more exposed to dropped balls or weaker connections than usual. This match will do us good and help us regain our self-confidence.”

The staff feel that this lack of confidence, like the frequent clumsiness, is one of the points that needs to be corrected quickly. “Overall, let’s face it, it was a mixed game on a number of levels,” says David Ortiz.

ADVERTISEMENT

Set Plays

9
Scrums
9
100%
Scrum Win %
67%
17
Lineout
11
82%
Lineout Win %
82%
2
Restarts Received
5
50%
Restarts Received Win %
60%

“We were quite pleased with our defence and conquest. But we lacked precision in attack. It’s still our DNA, our project, and everyone is part of it. We can still improve on certain details.

“We need to get our heads together, find our automatisms and finish passing these balls. We’ve created some opportunities to score, but now we need to finish the moves and make sure that we score more quickly.”

“Not everything is perfect yet,” continues Gaëlle Mignot. “Our kicking game is also a reflection of what we’ve been doing: there are times when there’s a bit of slagging and things don’t work. We’re not hiding behind this victory. We wanted to put a smile back on our faces with victory, but today we still have a lot of work to do.”

Match Summary

0
Penalty Goals
1
2
Tries
3
2
Conversions
2
0
Drop Goals
0
169
Carries
115
5
Line Breaks
9
14
Turnovers Lost
22
6
Turnovers Won
8
ADVERTISEMENT

Another example that corroborates the first observations. After a good first half in terms of discipline, Les Bleues gradually lost their way, getting into a number of errors, but without conceding a card.

“We went into the break with two errors, and that’s an area we’d targeted and focused on. We wanted to play a full match with 15 players,” confirms Gaëlle Mignot.

“Indiscipline had been costing us dearly in the form of cards for a number of games, and that was something we took for granted. At one point, in the last 20 minutes, the USA girls got back into the rhythm of the match and made progress. And that lead led to errors. We need to be able to manage these key moments of the match better if we’re going to be able to follow up these great performances.”

Looking ahead, the upcoming week promises excitement with the highly anticipated match against the Black Ferns.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
J
JPM 76 days ago

Unfortunately France is not improving but seriously regressing under the Mignot-Ortiz coaching tandem.

C
CN 76 days ago

Partly agree, France are not going forwards or backwards, they are just standing still

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search