Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Gatland backs extra time call to avoid repeating 2017 series tie

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Warren Gatland has suggested extra time should be allowed if this Saturday’s third and final Lions Test versus the Springboks ends in a draw at the end of normal time in Cape Town to avoid a repeat of the 2017 shared series with the All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Players and fans from both sides were left disappointed in Auckland four years after the deciding Test finished in a 15-all stalemate following Owen Farrell’s late penalty leveller and the decision by French referee Romain Poite to reverse his initial decision from the restart to give the All Blacks a penalty for a Ken Owens infringement.  

It resulted in the bizarre scene of respective skippers Sam Warburton and Kieran Read lifting the trophy together while both teams sat in on an unusual joint post-game team photograph. 

Video Spacer

Jacques Nienaber on why lock Franco Mostert has been moved to No7

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:42
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:42
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    Jacques Nienaber on why lock Franco Mostert has been moved to No7

    Despite the gap of four years in between tours to take care of all business surrounding this latest Lions tour, there is no scope for extra time to be played by referee Mathieu Raynal if this weekend’s latest series decider is a draw at the end of 80 minutes.  

    With this repeat stalemate in mind, Gatland has been quoted in the UK Telegraph saying he would like a change in the regulations before this Saturday’s game gets underway to ensure extra time can be played if needed. “Maybe that is something that someone can talk about over the next few days, about whether we do potentially go to extra time if it is a draw. That is not a bad idea.”

    The original Lions tour agreement has undergone significant changes since the tourists arrived in South Africa with alterations to the match schedule and venues. But with relations with the Springboks now at an all-time low following last week’s Rassie Erasmus behaviour and also the South Africans claiming Gatland damaged the integrity of the tour with his TMO query, it is difficult to see both factions reaching an agreement to allow for extra time.

    There have been just two tied Lions series previously, in 1955 in South Africa and four years ago in New Zealand. All Blacks coach Steve Hansen described the 2017 tie as like “kissing your sister” while suggestions from Gatland that the Lions should reassemble that November to play the All Blacks in the UK in a fourth Test decider were ignored.  

    ADVERTISEMENT

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo vs Kubota Spears | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Final | Full Match Replay

    Saitama Wild Knights vs Kobe Steelers | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Bronze Final | Full Match Replay

    Boks Office | Episode 42 | Investec Champions Cup Final Review

    Spain's Incredible Rugby Sevens Journey to the World Championship Final | HSBC SVNS Embedded | Episode 14

    Australia vs USA | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

    New Zealand vs Canada | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

    South Africa vs New Zealand | The Rugby Championship U20's | Full Match Replay

    The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    0 Comments
    Be the first to comment...

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    S
    Spew_81 1 hour ago
    Broken hand or not, Richie Mo'unga is still New Zealand's best 10

    His family was financially secure before future in going to Japan. Now they will only have to work if they feel like it :)


    It’s not like the amateur era, he would made about four million staying in New Zealand in the 2024-2027 cycle. He ultimately chose a few million extra going to Japan. Easy to understand if was still going to get the cold shoulder from the coaches. But Roberston poised to make Mo’unga the corner stone. It was Mo’unga’s chance to end the debate as to who was the best 10 in New Zealand.


    Yes, it’s possible to get a career ending injury at any time playing rugby. But that doesn’t often happen. Even most really bad injuries only take one season to recover from (yes there are outliers, but that’s rare). Even if he lost a season, he would still bring home four million.


    He could’ve been the difference between an All Black team that is second (probably lucky to be second) and an All Black team that is number one. Also, the current high earners only can earn highly because the New Zealand rugby system made them as good as they are. Beneficiaries of that system should look to give back to the system and to the fans. Yes, it’s a risk for the individual, but it’s a risk many took before him. New Zealand rugby is a fragile thing. The NZRU can barely make money most years. The sponsors won’t pay the same for a mid-ranked team as they will for team that is number one.


    We’ve discussed this before and I know you see it the other way :)

    44 Go to comments
    S
    Spew_81 1 hour ago
    Broken hand or not, Richie Mo'unga is still New Zealand's best 10

    The coaches who like those ideas ( e.g. non specialist/positionless/play what’s in front of you rugby) are often successful innovators e.g. Hansen, W Smith, E Jones etc.


    I think they get it in their head that they have to be constantly innovating to stay on top. Sometimes the best thing is just to focus on the basics/current pattern.


    To a degree I think that that type of coach gets bored - unless they are trying to break the mold. But also, their success to that point and personality type won’t allow them to drop the new idea and admit they were wrong.


    Much like when the All Blacks were going to have a ‘flat backline’ in the Henry era. They were adamant that it was going to work, eventually. They were prepared to lose a few tests to achieve it. After the 2009 season (losing 0-3 to the Springboks) they were more than willing to give up 20 meters to offset the 'rush defense’. They generally go that 20 meters back and more on top. It was to Henry’s credit be changed how the backline worked e.g. abandoned the ‘flat backline’ and dropped the power wings for three fullback/right wings.


    With the benefit of 20/20 hindsight: a Cruden(10)/B Barrett(15) combo might’ve been better for the 2016-2019 cycle; and a Mo’unga(10)/B Barrett(15) combo might’ve been better for the 2016-2019 cycle. Then maybe Mo’unga(10)/Jordan (15) [with McKenzie at reserve 9] for the 2020-2023 cycle.


    I went off the deep end a bit the end of the comment, see who reads that far down :)

    44 Go to comments
    TRENDING
    TRENDING Wallace Sititi drops to bench, Quinn Tupaea ruled out for Chiefs Wallace Sititi drops to bench for Chiefs vs Blues
    Search