Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Gatland has his say on 14-week pre-Lions gap facing Itoje and fellow Saracens stars following 2021 Six Nations

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Warren Gatland has no concerns about picking Championship-playing Saracens for the Lions, claiming the likes of Maro Itoje and his club colleagues would be in the enviable position of being the freshest players going on the 2021 tour to South Africa rather than being undercooked for elite-level rugby. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The London club faces tier-two rugby when the Championship begins in January following the club’s automatic relegation from the Premiership following repeated breaches of the salary cap.

That means England players such as touted Lions skippers Itoje and Owen Farrell, along with other previous Lions tourists Jamie George, the Vunipola brothers and Elliot Daly, won’t have elite rugby to play once the 2021 Six Nations ends in March (Scotland’s Sean Maitland also previously toured with the Lions).

Video Spacer

Billy Vunipola sets the scene ahead of England’s clash with Italy on Saturday

Video Spacer

Billy Vunipola sets the scene ahead of England’s clash with Italy on Saturday

Saracens’ England contingent will face a 14-week break in between England’s March 21 game away to Ireland and the Lions playing Japan at Murrayfield on June 26, but Gatland has no qualms they will only have some Championship game to fill that three-month gap.  

“Those players who are involved with England, the ones that are selected from Saracens, the thing about it is they will probably come in the freshest of everyone,” said Gatland, who is looking at taking a squad of 35/36 to South Africa, a selection that will have a 20 or 21/15 forwards/backs split.  

“It’s how they are managed from the Championship perspective in terms of games. You would probably think they would be reasonably comfortable in being able to win that competition and that’s being able to rotate players. A lot of those players will have been involved in the past, are pretty experienced, have a lot of games under their belt and a lot of rugby over a long time.

“This may be a perfect chance for them to almost look at the year as rehab in terms of their body, some strength and conditioning, some fitness work, some individual skill work.  They will be involved in the Six Nations and probably having a bit of a break and doing some training.

ADVERTISEMENT

“As we get close to picking the squad we will be contacting players to see what their training regime is like and where they are from a conditioning perspective because that is going to be important going to South Africa. A lot of those players have, for me, time in the bank because they have been performers on the big stage and have performed when it mattered.

“They have performed in Europe, performed in Premiership finals, performed for England and that’s what quality players can do. You have seen that in the past with big names that they can be out for a while and give them one or two games under their belt and be back up to speed very quickly.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Jake White: Ireland, Australia and Wales all have the same problem Jake White: Ireland, Australia and Wales have the same problem
Search