Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Gatland has just offered Scotland players an olive branch ahead of 2021 Lions

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Warren Gatland has offered Scotland players every incentive to challenge for 2021 Lions tour selection, the coach insisting that he is conscious of how the celebrated rugby tourists must have a fair representation from all four of the home unions.

ADVERTISEMENT

The New Zealander has been heavily criticised for how few Scots he has chosen when previously in charge of the Lions. RugbyPass last year posed the question of whether there was an anti-Scottish agenda festering among Lions hierarchy or was Gatland within his rights to ignore them, a debate that sparked a huge viral response. 

Gatland picked just three Scotsmen for the 2013 journey to Australia and just three again for the 2017 tour of his native New Zealand four years later, a low selection that left him open to accusations of bias given he coached Wales between 2008 and 2019 and was previously coach of Ireland.

Video Spacer

Lions boss Warren Gatland guests on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series

Video Spacer

Lions boss Warren Gatland guests on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series

Already installed as Lions boss for a third successive tour, his fourth in all having worked as an assistant on the 2009 trip to South Africa, Gatland has admitted he would like a better selection balance across all four nations.

Speaking on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series, Gatland suggested that impressive away performances by Scotland players in the lead-up to next year tour will definitely catch his eye. “I’m really, really conscious and I understand it’s important that we have a representation of the four home nations. That is really, really important for me,” he said. 

“I know every nation is so parochial and it’s understandable there is disappointment and disagreement about selection – and I want to have a good representation of Scottish players. I desperately want that to happen and I hope it does happen. 

“It is important that we do select players from every nation. The last thing you want to do is go on a Lions tour that has one or two nations, or no players from Scotland. Look, I know last time it created a certain amount of controversy and I have learnt a lot in the tours that I have been on – you reflect back and think what things you would do differently. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Look, I’m conscious and, as I said, I desperately want them to do well. When I look back at 2017 probably the hardest thing is when you are playing away from home you want players to be able to front up and win away from home. 

“It becomes important, particularly on the Lions. You are playing against a southern hemisphere team away from home and probably the big game, I didn’t expect them [Scotland] to win but I wished they hadn’t shipped 50 points against England at Twickenham (in that year’s Six Nations). That was not a great performance for a number of individuals

“It’s great to see they started the (2020) Six Nations so well. I thought they played well the first few games and had a really important win against France. They would have gone to Cardiff with a lot of confidence. 

“To win away from home and win in Cardiff, that would have been a significant result. The next twelve months as we get close to the Lions, I want all those teams to be able to perform well and make the selection for us difficult. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’m really conscious about that and we need to make sure that we have a balance from the four home nations. That is important.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 40 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search