GB make four changes to their squad for Vancouver SVNS

And no, ENG didn’t rely on the rolling maul. In fact, in the two tests won by ENG, the Red Roses backs scored 12 of their 13 tries. Seven by wingers, 2 by the fullback, 2 by the halfback, & 1 to the centre. Their other try was from a rolling maul.

We are facing demolition if we don’t stiffen up our forward pack, get at least parity at scrum, ruck, maul & lineout, & set a solid platform for our backs to do their magic. Any new strategy is useless without the work done up front.

I agree in some way to making it injury related, but for me that’s reducing the sub avaliable so that if you make some tactical changes, you want to leave one or two in case of late injuries. So 5 subs max (need to sub after that for injury is just like with cards, you go down a man) means the riskiest you’re going to get at the 50/60min mark is replacing four guys.

After three months of Googling legitimate cryptocurrency recovery companies. I finally found keycheinX asset recovery service on the Google reviews website, I contacted them through the Google reviews website, and they responded immediately. In less than 3 hours, they recovered my cryptocurrency. If you're encountering the same issue, kindly reach out on the telegram or email.

Email: keycheinx (@) mail.com

Telegram: (@)keycheinX

Reach out to them and thank me later.

You didn’t really make a good point yourself. A Data Analysts recently came in with an article about Super Rugby and was the first to correctly use Median instead of Mean as the basis of his prognosis. That’s what this article is missing. French forwards in their own would also have the widest margin of variance, with big and small forwards. French rugby, and their packs are frequently misidentified as large (again in just a recent article last week), when they actually have quite the tradition for athletic forwards as well.

Back back to the real issue you have tried to highlight, much like League went, the game now is moving all forwards towards the same size and shape. The topic of all sizes and shapes is not for the 75’s and the 140’s to get representation, it is that 90 to 110 range where everyone should probably be for the best rugby. Hell the most popular form of rugby now in NZ is the u85’s I think, and you have everyone in it, short f/r, bean pole locks, explosive 2nd5’s. I think there’s some allowance but everyone else would be between that 80 to 85 range I reckon.

I think it goes back to Grant Batty. Really enjoyed the explosion of all the little guys in Super Rugby this year as well, some of the best to watch. I’m not enjoying the discussion that stand out fowards in the competition like Du’Plessis Kirifi or Ioane Moananu are too small (read short) for International rugby forwards, so thank you very much Nick but you can kindly decease (FRO) with suggesting you can only be a forward if you’re 120kgs.