Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

GB men's and women's make 2 changes for decisive Singapore SVNS

Will Homer #12 of Great Britain is congratulated by teammates after scoring the game winning try in their match against Ireland during day one of the HSBC World Rugby Sevens Series - Vancouver at BC Place on February 23, 2024 in Vancouver, British Columbia. Great Britain won 17-14. (Photo by Jeff Vinnick/Getty Images)

Great Britain men’s and women’s have named their squads for the Singapore SVNS this weekend, with two changes in each squad for a decisive leg in the HSBC SVNS Series for both sides.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jamie Farndale and Api Bavadra both return to the men’s squad, who did not feature in Hong Kong SVNS where GB finished eleventh. They will take the place of Femi Sofolarin and Jamie Barden at the Singapore National Stadium on May 3-5.

The two changes in the women’s squad see Jasmine Joyce and Rhona Lloyd return to the squad in place of Abi Burton and Alicia Maude, who were part of GB’s ninth-place finish in Hong Kong.

Video Spacer

Chasing the Sun on RugbyPass TV | RPTV

Chasing the Sun, the extraordinary documentary that traces the Springboks’ road to victory at the 2019 Rugby World Cup, is coming to RugbyPass TV.

Watch now

Video Spacer

Chasing the Sun on RugbyPass TV | RPTV

Chasing the Sun, the extraordinary documentary that traces the Springboks’ road to victory at the 2019 Rugby World Cup, is coming to RugbyPass TV.

Watch now

With just one round of the regular season remaining before the Grand Final in Madrid, the Singapore SVNS will be the decisive leg of the season for both the men’s and women’s sides.

The men’s side sit in ninth place in the standings, just outside the top eight who will qualify for the Grand Final. As it stands, they are positioned to take part in the relegation battle. That could all change in Singapore though, with GB grouped in Pool B with series leaders Argentina, Fiji and, crucially, the USA, who sit only one place and seven points ahead of them in the standings.

The women’s team find themselves in a similar position to the men’s, although they stand one place higher in eighth place in the standings. They have been grouped with ninth-place Brazil in Pool C, who only trail them by two points, as well as Fiji and joint-series leaders Australia.

After six legs played so far this season, it all comes down to the pool stages in Singapore, which will define GB’s seasons.

ADVERTISEMENT

GB Men
3 Alex Davis
4 Kaleem Barreto
5 Ross McCann
6 Harry Glover
7 Jamie Farndale
9 Morgan Williams
10 Robbie Fergusson (c)
11 Ethan Waddleton
12 Will Homer
14 Max McFarland
15 Tom Emery
23 Api Bavadra
24 Charlton Kerr

GB Women
1 Lisa Thomson
4 Grace Crompton
5 Shona Campbell
6 Lauren Torley
7 Emma Uren (c)
9 Isla Norman-Bell
11 Jasmine Joyce (Abi Burton)
12 Amy Wilson Hardy
13 Ellie Boatman
16 Rhona Lloyd (Alicia Maude)
18 Kayleigh Powell
22 Jade Shekells
23 Heather Cowell

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search