Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

New England skipper Ellis Genge on 'brutal reality' of record loss

(Photo by Craig Mercer/MB Media/Getty Images)

First-time England skipper Ellis Genge has steered clear of publicly firing a verbal rocket at his underperforming team following their harrowing 53-10 hammering by France. The English had arrived into round four of the Guinness Six Nations still in the title hunt after recent wins over Italy and Wales.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, their ambitions of remaining alive in the race for championship silverware were detonated by an explosive seven-try French performance which only took 106 seconds to produce a memorable opening score.

The shambolic effort left the crestfallen Genge and England head coach Steve Borthwick sifting through the debris at a sombre Saturday evening media debrief at the same English Rugby HQ top table where only nine months ago the pair were overjoyed in the aftermath of leading Leicester to a first Premiership title since 2013.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

That day, their Tigers had fought tooth and nail to stay in the fight against the fancied Saracens. Here, their England team criminally surrendered the breakdown and collision zone and the wounds inflicted were brutal.

Apart from the early second-half try from Freddie Steward that reduced the leeway to 10-27, England conjured little or no resistance and were overrun coming down the finishing straight, the French making a nonsense of the greasy conditions with some brilliantly potent handling.

Related

The English waving of the white flag should have negatively stirred the emotions but Genge – at least publicly – insisted he was keeping the peace and not getting too emotional about the embarrassing England thumping. “I don’t think there is any point in shouting and bawling and pointing the finger at people,” he claimed in the aftermath of a fixture that had a number of England fans streaming towards the exits before the final whistle.

“You lose as a team; it is a collective performance. It doesn’t matter what one individual is doing at any one point in time, it is about winning together and losing together and ultimately fighting for each other and showing his much it matters and at times today we lacked that.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That is the brutal reality of it, that’s tier-one rugby, you get punished harshly and I don’t think anyone is under any illusions about anything different in that changing room at the moment.”

England had been bullied in the opening period. However, Genge insisted that belief within the team was still strong at the break when they talked about how they would try and bounce back from the 3-27 half-time deficit.

“Look, even when we were going in 20 points down at half-time, the message was always that we believe and the boys genuinely did believe that. But we lost the contact area and at Test level, if you lose the contact area and momentum, it’s a snowball effect. We started chasing our tail and struggled to get a foothold back in the game.

“But I have been in this situation numerous times before at club level, with international. We have been through some rough spells and everyone writes us off and brilliant – we are going to graft, we are going to work as hard as we can, and we will see where we come out… we will see where we are in six months (at the World Cup) but what we want to do is just get better next week (against Ireland).”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search