Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

George Ford on the key difference between the RWC squads of Lancaster's failures and Jones' hopefuls

(Photo by Bryn Lennon/Getty Images)

George Ford has revealed the fundamental difference between the England squad heading to the World Cup in Japan under Eddie Jones and the disastrous 2015 campaign that saw the host country fail to make the knockout stages.

ADVERTISEMENT

That debacle saw the departure of the coaching team headed by Stuart Lancaster and allowed Jones to take over and stamp his own authority on the players as he battled to identify the 31 players who will attempt to replicate the trophy-winning triumph of the 2003 England squad. 

Ford believes that four years ago the players were too focussed on making the squad rather than winning the tournament and that has changed under Jones.

Lancaster’s campaign was hampered by the controversy surrounding his decision to include rugby league star Sam Burgess in the final squad at the expense of Northampton’s Luther Burrell. It was a move that proved to be a constant thorn in the management’s side during the tournament where they lost key pool games to Australia and Wales.

Ready to lead England for the second successive game against Wales in Cardiff on Saturday, Ford said: “The main thing is that I felt in 2015 the most important thing was getting into the squad to play in the World Cup rather than putting all your focus and energy into being a squad that can go out and win it.

“In 2015 it was more of an individual thing with wanting to be part of the World Cup whereas now it is a case of we know where we are as a squad, so let’s put all our energy and focus into making sure we are as tight as possible to go out and win the thing.

“It is a bit of a different mindset because you put your energies into being part of a successful England team rather than being part of an England team going to a World Cup. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“There are quite a few of the lads who were involved in 2015 who would agree and Eddie has been consistent in saying that everyone has a role to play within the squad and the value he adds to the squad translates into the performance at the weekend. That is what I am on about because we now know where we are as a squad.”

With England opting to take just two scrum-halves to the World Cup, Ford is the emergency option and could even get time in the role – depending on the state of the game – in Cardiff. 

He is not fazed by the challenge and believes England forwards would take more notice of his demands if he was issuing them much closer to the action. 

Ford at No9 would be just one of the personal challenges Jones wants to set his players and the Leicester outside half understands the reasoning.

ADVERTISEMENT

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1MCAFSIljo/

He added: “Even when I have trained at No9 in sessions he [Jones] has not come up to me beforehand and said I would be doing a bit of nine. You just have to adapt and that is a good place to be as a player – being able to adapt. 

“If you can do a really a good job of it then it can only make you a better player. Also, it allows you an appreciation of what a nine’s job is with me being a 10 and what I expect and want off a scrum-half and then you are in that position. Owen (Farrell) might be demanding, so I had better give him the ball!”

WATCH: George Ford speaking at the England team announcement media conference

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call
Search