Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Steve Borthwick handed fresh injury concern ahead of Six Nations

By PA
Steve Borthwick, (L) the England head coach looks on with backs coach, Richard Wigglesworth during the England training session held at the LNER Community Stadium on March 01, 2024 in York, England. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

George Furbank could miss the start of England’s Six Nations campaign after fracturing his arm in Northampton’s victory over the Bulls on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Furbank has been told that he might require an operation to repair the damage sustained half an hour into the 30-21 Investec Champions Cup win in Pretoria.

The 28-year-old full-back started three of England’s four Tests last month, losing his place to Freddie Steward for the defeat by South Africa, and is now a doubt for the opening rounds of the Six Nations.

“George has fractured his arm. It can vary so there’s nothing concrete on how long that will take,” Northampton head coach Sam Vesty said.

“It is a big loss, he is a fantastic rugby player. He is our club captain and has really grown into that leadership role over the last couple of years.”

Related

Top 100

Rugby’s best of the best, ranked by experts. Check out our list of the Top 100 Men's Rugby Players and let us know what you think! 



ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
f
fl 4 hours ago

If Borthwick plans on selecting Marcus Smith at 10 then the abscence of Furbank could be a massive problem, as Smith really needs distributors alongside him in order to focus on his running game. Perhaps Borthwick will need to think about drafting in someone like Daly or Malins, but that would be a big risk given they haven't trained with the team in so long.


If Borthwick plans on selecting Ford then this isn't a big issue. Ford is able to adapt to those around him and will function perfectly well with Steward.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
OJohn 47 minutes ago
Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?

Kiwi coaches have destroyed Wales. They have almost stripped the welsh population of any passion for rugby, of any desire for young welsh boys to play rugby, or represent their country. Who wants to play for a narky know it all kiwi, except kiwis ? Not Rees -Zammit.


Kiwi coaches are vindictively trying to do the same to Australia.


Of course Australia's next coach or coaches must be an Australian but they must also not be from the Tahs, like Cheika or Eddie Jones. They just can't help themselves choosing hopeless Tah pets, like Foley, or Phipps, or Hooper, or Beale, or Mumm, or Porecki or Donaldson over much better Australian players, which cripples the team and it's morale.


But the Tahs don't care. They put themselves before Australian rugby and if they can't justify a Tah coach, a compliant kiwi who will do the same thing is just as good.


I'm amazed, sort of, that so many Kiwis, Argentinians, Welshmen and Scotsmen, want Joe Schmidt to ignore his son's welfare, just for the opportunity to undermine Australian rugby, again. It is very callous.


It is also callous in my opinion for Joe Schmidt to see undermining Australian rugby as more important than his son's welfare, despite having promised his son and his wife after his indulgent Ireland coaching gig, that he would spend more time with them and pulling his weight at home.


What sort of bitter and twisted individual sees a vindictive campaign against Australia as more crucial than looking after his family ? Are all kiwis this vindictive ? Some I know are not and are equally flabbergasted at Schmidt's chutzpah in ignoring his previous promises to his family, to coach the Wallabies to failure, from NZ, whenever he is there of course .....


It shows just how desperate and mean spirited the Tahs are as well, to want to insist he stays away from his family, just so more Tah players get a spot in the Wallabies. It is beyond callous.


Dear kiwis, please just bugger off out of Australian rugby. It's dragging you down as well by making sure you have no real competition. How dumb can you be ?

7 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

I'm not sure how it's really structure now. It certainly should be a representation of its constituents though, and if that was 1/3 England then fair enough.


Would I'd be think is that in the future that's not going to be the case. Having such a large number of WCs certainly adds flexibility of some nature in that regards, I'm just not sure it would be the best.

South Africa isn't part of european rugby at all

Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?


Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side, but I certainly wouldn't think it's a necessity when they are likely to get a decent chance if they're good enough with yours (but that is the thrust of typical tournement like this, eg when NZ/All Whites got a free entry into FIFA WC etc).


Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in.

The purpose of the EPCR comps is, I think, the facilitate competition between the best of the 3 leagues.

And at this point has the chance to raise the pinnacle of domestic rugby standards/theatre, which can drive its growth around the world. So if the point is to get the best rugby on the park possible, I certainly think that intent has a lot of merit at this point. The competition still be changed in the future when needed, my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to.


Finally, were going full circle here, yes, that is the question I'm raising. I'm highlighting that those leagues/countries chose to implement a "bigger base" model (not saying those bases are therefor bigger than "clubs" who didn't adopt that model mind you), aside from maybe Ireland. Those countries could have kept their leagues and had what you suggest it already really is, a defacto european comp, with simply a couple of their best rotating through Pro/URC rugby. Instead they chose to funnell all their players into say 4 sides, to improve their quality and allow all to stay in the league (instead of say if a random team like Cardiff do well at the onset and then continue to lure others talent to them to keep them permenatly at the top, while others rotate in and out so often they can't get a foothold etc). Now, that doesn't mean too much in an of itself, but what I see is an approach that is going to improve these teams, especially in places like Ireland, Scotland, SA, (but possibly also detrimental to having at least one strong team in Wales case), and should therefor have a guarentee of representation. So in my case I think that repsented with 7 partipants, so that might look something like (the 7 found by URCs own chosen method) the four semi finalsts (or top four seed if they prefer that), then each regions top side if not in the four, then back to seed to fill it out etc.

34 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Top 100: The unluckiest players not to make the list Top 100: The unluckiest players not to make the list
Search