Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Goneva-gate and 'a games value offence' - former ref unpacks the controversy

Vereniki Goneva (Getty Images)

For much of the weekend the Gallagher Premiership’s opening headlines seemed likely to focus on big defeats for Sale and Leicester and a piece of Danny Cipriani debut magic rather than controversy.

ADVERTISEMENT

But that will provide scant consolation to elite group referee Ian Tempest, for whom a seemingly straightforward decision 20 minutes into his seasonal opener at Kingston Park has quickly blown up into something of a storm.

As the rugby-watching world has now seen, little seemed amiss when Newcastle’s Niki Goneva fielded Saracens No.10 Owen Farrell’s failed drop goal attempt behind his own line.

However, the speedy Fijian proved as rapid in thought as deed. Having carefully positioned his body to shield Sarries’ view of the slow-moving ball, he feigned to touch down but instead brushed his boot laces with the ball prior to setting off down the right wing in a 110-metre unopposed dash to the visitors’ try-line.

Even the most ardent Fez-head would struggle to find anything in the law book which resulted in any outcome other than the award of a Newcastle try. However, to their great relief, Mr Tempest had already – erroneously – awarded a 22-metre drop out.

This whistle may well have accounted for Goneva’s lack of opposition, and despite his protestations a restart drop out was the only possible outcome once the referee had blown.

But after the Premiership champions went on to open their season with a bonus point success over the Falcons – aka everyone’s second favourite team – social media exploded with ‘Goneva-gate’ accusations.

ADVERTISEMENT

And while he may opt to avoid trial by Twitter, even a spot of light reading on Mr Tempest’s long journey home will not have brought the beleagured whistler much solace, judging by the verdicts of the rugby media.

“Newcastle left to rue controversial refereeing calls” said the Daily Telegraph’s headline, while the BBC website commented: “Newcastle were denied a try in bizarre circumstances.”

But what will probably hurt him most, is the knowledge that his Monday Twickenham sit-down with boss Tony Spreadbury will find an understandable, even forgivable error was compounded by a second completely avoidable self-inflicted wound.

After a long-distance and impromptu snap drop goal such as this, an organised kick chase is rare. Given that a touchdown or dead ball usually follows a failed kick, few referees therefore have the time or inclination to progress beyond the 22-metre line restart point.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, this does not mean the referee’s concentration can waiver, or eyes can stray far from the ball and those around it. And despite not seeing Goneva touch the ball down – perhaps due to a line of sight interrupted by Newcastle players or post padding – it seems likely that Tempest momentarily relaxed.

When the Newcastle flyer started to run, the official therefore made a rapid reactive decision based on gut instinct and what his sub-conscious told him had probably happened rather than a more considered one, and got it wrong.

Getty Images

Not ideal at this level, but also far from a hanging offence. Shrug the shoulders and move on.

Many have since said Tempest should have allowed play to continue, knowing a TMO referral would subsequently have cleared matters up. While this is true, it fails to consider the alternative scenario which will have flashed through his mind.

Since had Goneva actually completed the touchdown and been heading for his 22 to take a quick drop-out, imagine the carnage that might have resulted had the unsuspecting winger then been crunched by a Saracens forward while on that journey to the restart point.

So once Mr Tempest was unsure about what actually happened in goal, in that split second he undoubtedly took the safest available option.

Had this been the end of the matter there would have been little further comment, however, the under-pressure official attempted to talk his way out of the small hole he had dug.

And in doing so he rapidly replaced a shovel with a mechanical digger by explaining the recall of Goneva as being down to “a games value offence.”

Since these words were not followed up by the award of a penalty, presumably Mr Tempest failed to even convince himself that this was an accurate assessment of what he had – or rather hadn’t – seen.

But assuming this rather clumsy term is a euphemism for gamesmanship, selling a dummy to an opponent hardly ranks alongside – say – the hand of Back or Bloodgate.

After all, what difference exists between Goneva’s actions and any number of other commonplace scenarios? For instance, how about the goal-kicker who having been awarded a penalty retreats from the mark to widen the kicking angle before taking a quick tap and racing past a dozy retreating defence to the try-line?

But in truth, despite the acres of newsprint and screaming social media masses, little harm has been done. Goneva would not have got out of his own half without Tempest’s premature whistle, and with an hour remaining the incident did not turn the match.

And even if the refereeing pecking order behind the retirement-bound Wayne Barnes has just undergone its first minor revision of the season, with 21 more rounds remaining this particular tempest will quickly blow itself out.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 20 minutes ago
The numbers show Super Rugby Pacific just got even tougher

“The competition is tough, because you’ve got to spit out performances every week, and to be able to do that consistently you’ve got to have good depth.”

You’ve got to look forward to next weekend more than anything too.

The bonus points view is a good one. The majority of bonus points earned in the first three rounds last season were for scoring three tries more than the opposition, while three quarters of bonus points in 2025 have gone to the losing side getting to within seven points of the victors.

They really use this sorta system? Much smaller pool of bonus points available, that would mean they have far less impact. Interestingly you must be withen winning range/chance in France’s Top 14 league, rather that just draw territory, so 6 points instead of 7. Fairly arbitrary and pointless (something the NRL would do to try and look cool), but kinda cool.


I said it Nick’s and other articles, I’m not sure about the fixed nature of matchups in these opening rounds. For instance, I would be interested in seeing an improved ranking/prediction/reflection ladder to what we had last year, were some author here game so rejigged list of teams purely based of ‘who had played who’ so far in the competition. It was designed to analyze the ladder and better predict what the real order would be after the full round robin had completed. It needed some improvement, like factoring in historical data as well, as it was a bit skiwif, but it is the sort of thing that would give a better depiction of what sort of contests weve had so far, because just using my intuition, the matchups have been very ‘level appropriate’ so far, and were jet to get the other end of the spectrum, season ranked bottom sides v top sides etc.

3 Go to comments
M
Marlece Davis 4 hours ago
Crusaders prepare for 'dangerous in all elements' Chiefs game-breaker

I initially started trading with Pips Global because of the variety of trading accounts they offered, including their Funded Next accounts. These accounts seemed like an appealing opportunity, as they gave traders the chance to trade with a larger balance after successfully passing a challenge. For someone like me who was looking to scale up my trading without having to risk a significant amount of my own capital, it seemed like the perfect option. At first, I started with their Micro account, which had high leverage, fast market execution, and tight variable spreads. All these features seemed to align well with my trading goals, and I felt confident moving forward.However, things took a turn for the worse as I continued trading. I ended up losing a significant amount, around 30,000 AUD, due to what I now believe was a scam. The trades I placed weren’t executing properly, and there were discrepancies with the spreads and market conditions. I tried to reach out to Pips Global’s customer support, but I wasn’t receiving the kind of help I expected. It became increasingly clear that the platform wasn’t as reliable as I had originally thought, and I felt completely stuck.In my search for a solution, I came across PYRAMID HACK SOLUTION, a service that specializes in helping people recover lost funds from fraudulent brokers. Their team was highly professional, thorough, and patient. They guided me step by step through the entire recovery process, keeping me informed at every stage. They also provided me with solid advice on how to avoid falling into similar traps in the future. Thanks to PYRAMID HACK SOLUTION, I was able to recover my 30,000 AUD, which was an incredible relief after such a stressful experience.If you’re considering trading with Pips Global, I strongly recommend doing thorough research before committing. Website; https://pyramidhacksolution.com While their Funded Next accounts and other account options might seem enticing, my personal experience with them was ultimately disappointing. I would advise anyone looking to trade with them to be cautious, especially if things don’t seem to be going as expected.If you find yourself in a situation similar to mine, I can’t recommend PYRAMID HACK SOLUTION enough. WhatsApp; +447414280914 Their expertise in fund recovery was a lifesaver, and they were instrumental in helping me get my money back. Thanks to their support, I’m now back on track, and I’ve learned a valuable lesson about being more cautious with online trading platforms.

6 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING English rugby pundits and fans really need to get a grip England rugby fans need to get a grip
Search