Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Great moments in Lions tour history: When Brian Moore went mountain climbing at Eden Park

Climb Every Mountain: The Brian Moore Story

Jamie Wall pays tribute to one of the great practitioners of the lost art of rucking.

ADVERTISEMENT

Brian Moore, today an outspoken pundit, was once an outspoken and uncompromising player. The English hooker was selected for the 1993 Lions tour of New Zealand and is remembered for one legendary moment in the second test.

After Rory Underwood’s match-winning try, Moore gestured to the very disgruntled Athletic Park crowd about which team was on top. Legend has it a patron hurled a can of beer at him, which he caught and consumed on the spot.

While he talks about that here, sadly there’s no footage of the incident – presumably because they would’ve been filming the conversion. However, there was one more piece of rugby that would never happen nowadays that Moore was involved with that very much did get caught on camera.

In the midweek game against Auckland, the Lions found themselves hot on attack. Home side player Eroni Clarke gets himself caught on the wrong side of the ruck and this is what happened:

Ouch. That’s some good old-fashioned rucking, with a little Kung Fu kick at the end that Eric Cantona may have taken some inspiration from.

What makes it even more old-school is that referee Dave Bishop decided that not only did Clarke deserve to have his rear end shredded to the bone by Moore’s boots, but he was in the wrong rules-wise. Even taking into account that this was the old days, the penalty try that Bishop subsequently awarded the Lions for slowing down the ruck seems excessively harsh.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moore actually responded to the above tweet and was unsurprisingly unrepentant about the entire episode. He claimed that ‘when you are in New Zealand you play by New Zealand rules’, which is a pretty fair argument given that rucking was still very much a part of the game back then.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473306980″]

Of course, if that happened in this day and age anyone doing that sort of thing would be red carded and banned for the rest of the season.

Moore’s ruckmanship was ultimately in vain, though, as Auckland went on to win the match 23-18. This was no disgrace given that the home side contained a whopping 13 All Blacks, and shows that the tough tour schedule that the 2017 Lions have is nothing new.

This week they find themselves back at Eden Park for another midweek battle, this time against a Blues side desperate to salvage something from another disappointing season. Given that rucking has gone the way of the sand kicking tee and long-sleeved jerseys, it’s probably fair to say that the only fancy footwork in this game will be by the likes of Rieko Ioane, Melani Nanai and hopefully a few of the Lions.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 45 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search