Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Green light' given for Australia to host Rugby World Cup

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images for Rugby Australia)

Australia has effectively been given the green light to stage the 2027 Rugby World Cup after being listed by the governing body as the “preferred candidate” to host the global tournament.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a new approach to the hosting selection process, the World Rugby council has created a ‘preferred candidate’ phase in which Australia was granted exclusivity to work with the governing body to host the global event for the first time since 2003.

England was given similar backing on Wednesday to host the 2025 women’s Rugby World Cup.

Australia had been in a contest with the United States to stage the 2027 men’s event but the council has effectively ruled out any duel by now indicating that the 2031 event is likely to go the US.

Video Spacer

Why Rieko Ioane can be a world class centre | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

Video Spacer

Why Rieko Ioane can be a world class centre | Healthspan Elite Performer of the Week

The council said an “exclusive targeted dialogue” would continue with the US in regard to hosting the 2031 tournament and also a women’s edition at some point in the future.

The final hosting rights will be awarded by the council in May next year, World Rugby added, but Wednesday’s decision effectively means Australia can forge ahead with its plans for one of the world’s biggest sports events in six years’ time.

“We’re, lets say, 90 or 95 per cent of the way there,” bid director and two-time World Cup-winning Wallabies hooker Phil Kearns said.

“We’re in the 75th minute of the game and we’re leading and don’t want to let it go.”

Rugby Australia Chairman Hamish McLennan described it as a “a once-in-a-generation opportunity” that should eliminate the code’s financial woes and, according to RA boss Andy Marinos “reset the commercial landscape” for the sport.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kearns said as many as 16 venues had been earmarked, but only “eight to 10” – to be determined after May’s final decision – would be used for games under World Rugby guidelines.

Many more locations in all corners of the country would be used as training bases though, with “art, wine and food trails” among the lures set to attract tourists seeking more from their experience than rugby.

The announcement comes six months after Australia formally launched its bid, which sparked a series of community events across the country.

A host of current and former Wallabies as well as key business and political influencers have backed the bid, while a delegation toured during the Wallabies’ Spring Tour of the United Kingdom to effectively seal the deal.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 2027 event is projected to attract more than two million people across seven weeks of competition, including 200,000 international visitors, and generate a $2.5 billion boost for the economy.

Organisers said it will create 13,300 jobs and stimulate $500 million in new trade and investment.

“It’s a huge economic benefit for the nation and I’m thrilled rugby can drive that,” Kearns said.

“It potentially secures financially the future of rugby for a long, long time in this country.

“After the trials and tribulations of the pandemic they (World Rugby) were looking for something solid, and we’re solid.”

The next women’s Rugby World Cup was postponed until next year in New Zealand due to COVID-19.

The next men’s tournament will be held in France in 2023 with the Wallabies set to play on home soil again in the 2027 edition – 24 years since the hosts reached the 2003 final in Sydney.

It promises to be an exciting period for the sport in Australia, with a British & Irish Lions tour in 2025 and the World Cup in 2027 a prelude to an Olympics in Brisbane in 2032.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
S
Shaune 1122 days ago

It seems 3rd worlds in emerging markets don't get a look at. SA last hosted in 1995, and it was a great tournament. What about Argentina? Italy? France, UK and Aus repeatedly getting tournaments.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search