Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Hasn’t been proven’: Gregor Townsend wary of trusting mouthguard technology

By PA
Andy Christie of Scotland celebrates victory after defeating England during the Guinness Six Nations 2024 match between Scotland and England at BT Murrayfield Stadium on February 24, 2024 in Edinburgh, Scotland. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Scotland head coach Gregor Townsend expressed concerns about the implementation of smart mouthguards after temporarily losing a second player in successive Guinness Six Nations matches for a head injury assessment triggered by the new technology.

ADVERTISEMENT

This championship is the first time that elite male players have worn ‘instrumented’ mouthguards which send alerts whenever a ‘head acceleration event’ with G-force that exceeds 70g and 4,000 radians per second squared is detected.

Scotland are thought to have been the only team impacted so far, with hooker George Turner going off for an HIA in the first half of the match against France a fortnight ago, with fellow front-rower Zander Fagerson – who was visibly puzzled as he made his way off the pitch – having to do likewise in the seventh minute of Saturday’s Calcutta Cup win over England.

Both players were deemed fit to return to the pitch.

Asked after the England game if Fagerson’s departure from the field was triggered by his mouthguard, Townsend said: “Yes, it was and I saw the tackle again, just a normal tackle.

“I think we have to really watch what we’re doing here by trusting technology that’s not been proven.

“What we’ve been doing over the last few years is making sure that any symptoms that are seen, by a number of people, can flag up whether someone goes off for an HIA.

“Zander was taken off for 10 minutes after what looked like a normal tackle but there was a spike alert from the mouthguard.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I know in Super Rugby there were a couple of alerts and players were saying ‘there’s nothing wrong here, I’ve just made a tackle’, so we’ve got to watch that because you don’t want to be taking our best players off the field for 10 minutes if there are no issues around concussion.

“We want to protect our players, that’s for certain, but there’s a bit more work to do before this technology is correct.”

Asked if he felt the technology had been rushed in to top-level rugby, Townsend said: “It’s a new thing in the Six Nations and it’s not been used at club level prior to the Six Nations.

“I’d hope they’d learn from today’s incident, and obviously George Turner went off for 10 minutes in the previous game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We need to make sure it’s as close to accurate as possible. That’s what we want.

“We have lots of eyes watching and players are now very good at saying ‘I’ve had a head injury here, I have to go off’.

“I think we just need to do a bit more work here before we move on.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

Y
YeowNotEven 36 minutes ago
The All Blacks don't need overseas-based players

As it is now, players coming through are competing for franchise spots with ABs.

So they have to work their pants off.

They are mentored by All Blacks, they see how to prepare and work and what it means and blah blah blah.

To get a SR start you have to be of a certain quality.

With the top talent overseas, players coming in don’t need to work as hard so they don’t get as good.

That’s Australias problem; not enough competition for spots driving the quality up. The incumbents at the reds or brumbies aren’t on edge because no one is coming for their jersey.

Without All Blacks to lead the off field stuff, our players will not get as good.

South Africa is an example of that. As more and more springboks went overseas, the Super rugby sides got worse and worse to the point where they were hardly competitive.

The lions got a free pass to the finals with the conference system,

but largely the bulls and stormers and sharks were just nothing like they were and not a serious challenge to any New Zealand side most of the time.

We got scrum practice, but interest in those games plummeted. I’m not paying $30 to go watch the bulls get wasted by a Blues B team.

If NZ was to let players go offshore and still get picked, the crowds would disappear even more for SR, the interest would dissipate, and people would go watch league or basketball or whatever and get their kids into those sports too.

New Zealand rugby just cannot function without a strong domestic comp.

The conveyer belt stops when kids don’t want to go to rugby games because their stars aren’t playing and therefore aren’t inspired to play the game themselves.

We won’t keep everyone, no matter what we do. But we can keep as many as possible.

We don’t have tens of millions of people, or billionaire owned teams, or another ready made competition to put our teams into.

We have the black jersey. And it’s what keeps rugby going.

66 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why the Wallabies' Murrayfield munching offered a worrying glimpse of the Lions showdown Why the Wallabies' Murrayfield munching offered a worrying glimpse of the Lions showdown
Search