Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Guy Novès' Big Plans To Save French Rugby

Guy Noves

Two new agreements brokered between the FFR and LNR look set to curb the number of overseas players in the Top 14 and return the French national side to its former glory. James Harrington explains.

ADVERTISEMENT

Those of a certain age may recall the glory days of French rugby with a wistful sigh, their minds running a grainy showreel featuring highlights of a bloodsoaked Jean-Pierre Rives and a perfectly balanced Serge Blanco; the silver streak that was Philippe Bernat-Salles or Thomas Castaignède doing his tongue-out chicken dance.

Younger rugby fans, however, are more likely to admit that, much like Father Christmas, they no longer believe in this mysterious ‘French flair’ their elders whisper of in awed tones. The French rugby they know is dour and staid and uninspired. Bash. Bosh. Grunt. Repeat. And, more often than not, lose.

Those who like their rugby theories neat and tidy point to the rise of the Top 14 as the richest league in the world as coinciding with the decline and fall of the national team. Yes, club squads are full of exciting imports, they say, but quality ‘Made in France’ players are almost impossible to come by.

At first glance, they have a point. Rugby fans have known for years the French national side is a shadow of its legendary flair-filled self.

But things are not that clear-cut. Coaches have come, blamed the Top 14, blamed the clubs, blamed everyone else, and gone. But it’s not as bad as Philippe Saint-André’s constant fiddling may have led you to believe.

In fact, France has a rich supply of talent at nine and 10. It has the makings of a three-quarter line with the speed and nous to scare just about any opposition you’d care to mention. And powerful, mobile forwards? That production line is running smoothly.

ADVERTISEMENT

The good news – if you’re French, or at least miss the glory days of French rugby – is that two halves of what has been described as a ‘small revolution’ have come together under mostly favourable stars, so that this ridiculous talent could strut its stuff on the Test stage sooner rather than later.

A historic accord between the FFR, which runs the national team, and the LNR, made up of club presidents from the Top 14 and ProD2, has allowed France coach Guy Novès to select a 30-man ‘Elite’ squad and a 20-strong ‘Development’ group. He oversees their training, game time and rest periods. He also has more time with them at key points in the calendar – November internationals, Six Nations, the next World Cup.

It would be easy to imagine Novès – who, years later than he should have done, finally took charge of France after last year’s World Cup quarter-final humiliation against New Zealand – bashing a few heads together behind the scenes to get clubs to agree to these changes.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473723660″]

He could do this because, unlike previous incumbents of the hotseat at the national side’s training centre at Marcoussis, he packs a powerful influential punch in the conservative corridors of power that run rugby in France.

ADVERTISEMENT

That accord alone means the gnomic coach, who won four European Cups and 10 French championships with Toulouse, can begin plotting his country’s way back up the rugby pecking order.

But it’s not all. From next season, France’s 30 Top 14 and ProD2 clubs must name a minimum of 14 JIFF-qualified players in their match day squads. Those who do not reach this quota will lose points – up to 10 if they miss the mark badly enough.

In the 2014/15 season, 10 points was the difference between a European Champions Cup slot and relegation to the ProD2.

What’s JIFF, you ask? Call it a quota system if you want, but it’s typically convoluted – typically French. It stands for Joueurs Issus des Filières de Formation. Qualified players are those who have been part of a French club’s youth academy for three seasons before the age or 21, or who had been licensed to play in France for five seasons before the age of 23.

Equally, from next season no more than 16 players in clubs’ 35-man squads can be non-JIFF. That is to say, imports. Overseas players. Pension-fillers. And that’s including any medical jokers – though, crucially, not players hired as cover for those named in Novès’ Elite squad.

Most clubs support the system. Even Racing 92’s owner Jacky Lorenzetti has publicly backed the idea. Two are notable in their opposition. Toulon’s Mourad Boudjellal, who is running to be president of the LNR, has called it unworkable, while the outraged silence from Mohed Altrad, owner of Jake White’s South African player-outreach scheme at Montpellier, is deafening.

The question is: are either of them willing to risk points – and with them play-off or European places – to prove their point?

Regardless, we can expect a few out-of-contract overseas players in France’s Top 14 to start heading back home in search of a job from the end of this season.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search