Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Hamish Watson is never too small': Ex-Lions skipper's ringing endorsement for the Scottish back row whose size has divided opinion

(Photo by Getty Images)

Ex-Lions skipper Sam Warburton has given a ringing endorsement to the chances of Scotland’s Hamish Watson making the upcoming tour to South Africa. There has been criticism of the back row, allegations that he would be too small to thrive against hulking type South African players.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the 2021 Guinness Six Nations player of the tournament has been backed by Warburton ahead of the May 6 squad announcement by Warren Gatland, a coach the 2013 and 2017 Lions skipper knows all about from his time on tour and also as Wales captain.

Hamish Watson is never too small,” insisted successful Lions skipper Warburton. “Josh Navidi has his critics for Wales, Justin Tipuric has probably had them over his career. I said this on Twitter recently, power trumps size every day of the week. 

Video Spacer

Mike Brown and Maggie Alphonsi guest on the latest RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

Mike Brown and Maggie Alphonsi guest on the latest RugbyPass Offload

“I played against plenty of big guys who were slugs, but it’s that repeated power is what you need and personally, Warren Gatland would have been purring watching Hamish Watson over the Six Nations. I thought he was outstanding. As things are now, he is a Test starter and I can’t wait to see how he goes in the first few warm-up games.”

Having forged a stellar career in the back row, Warburton is understandably intrigued by what will unfold on the Lions tour in South Africa, not only with Watson but with so many others. In naming the six players he feels are bankers to start a Test, Warburton chose two back rows in Taulupe Faletau and Tom Curry but his thoughts on selection beyond that are wide-ranging going on his various comments at the midweek Canterbury jersey launch.  

Asked if any Irish players had caught the eye, he said: “Josh van der Flier has been phenomenal. He has played brilliantly. I’m not much of a stats guy but he made the most metres out of any flanker in Six Nations, made the most tackles behind Justin Tipuric. Technically he is a brilliant No7, he does exactly what a No7 needs to do, but this is where it is so tricky. You have got Watson, Curry, van der Flier, Tipuric and (Josh) Navidi to fit into three and I don’t know how you are going to do that. 

“I’d say (Tadhg) Beirne at six. Gatland would be more inclined to pick someone a bit heavier because I know he values that weight in the second row. If we played second rows on the light side he would flag it and say that is something we could target. He will be picked as a second row/back row. Talking of Test starters, he is not one of the front line starters for the second row so that is why the back row might come more into play. Players like himself, Maro Itoje, Courtney Lawes if he goes, they could find themselves at six. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It makes them safe picks to go because you need players who can jump into that back row as well and those players do that. Tadhg Beirne, for me, is nailed on to go on tour and he has got a great chance at being a Test starter and six will suit him as well.”

Warburton revisited the back row equation later when quizzed on the specific chances of Navidi, Tipuric and Faletau following their recent Guinness Six Nations title-winning exploits. “Tipuric, the hard ground will suit him. I imagine (Gregor) Townsend will be pushing for Tipuric. Gatland said the other coaches sent in their squads and I’m pretty sure Tipuric would have been in Gregor Townsend’s squad. There is not an attack coach in the world who wouldn’t want him in their team. 

“Then every defence coach would probably pick Josh Navidi because he is so good at defence and he is actually great in attack for many different reasons. It kind of goes without notice but he will secure speedy rucks. People will take that for granted but he is so good. 

“Toby is just a shoo-in, one of the classiest players I have ever played with. I remember I said in the autumn Toby would be the Lions No8 and I got a bit of heat on Twitter but I was ‘he will turn up, I guarantee he will turn up’ and lo and behold, he turned up for the Six Nations. Anybody who writes off Toby is a fool. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Ask any coach, nobody tells Toby what to do. There is a lot of structure in rugby but Toby is one of those players who is just so naturally gifted they just let him fit in. He knows when to drop back, when to be front line, he just gets it and he doesn’t even know he knows it. 

“That is the strengths of the three (Wales players) but unfortunately I don’t think all three will go on tour. Tom Curry will go, possibly Sam Simmonds will go and then you have also got six covering out of Maro, Lawes and Beirne. All those players and the three Welsh boys essentially don’t fit. There is going to be some big, big omissions. 

“If (Sam) Underhill continues playing with Bath that will have an impact because England missed him and Lawes massively. You can’t overlook them because they haven’t played Six Nations because those guys can have way too much of an impact and they are two of the most physical players you could ever have. 

“The reason Lawes went on the last tour was they knew his aggressiveness would pay dividends in the wet in New Zealand and he was there in the Test squad in Wellington. Gatland likes his style and the fact he covers six as well, it makes you think that all these brilliant back rows you have got, including van der Flier, they are not all going to go and there could be a Welsh back row casualty.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 27 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search