Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Hansen says it's 'stupid' NZR haven't signed Foster until 2023 RWC

Steve Hansen and Ian Foster. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Former All Blacks coach Sir Steve Hansen has taken aim at New Zealand Rugby [NZR] for its failure to re-sign Ian Foster through until the 2023 World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

Foster’s current deal as All Blacks boss is set to expire this year after he signed a two-year deal with NZR to succeed Hansen as head coach of the national team after the 2019 World Cup.

Speaking to Newstalk ZB, Hansen labelled NZR’s decision to have not already signed Foster, his former assistant of eight years, through until the next World Cup as “stupid”.

Video Spacer

Vern Cotter on the huge obstacles Flying Fijians have to overcome to play All Blacks

Video Spacer

Vern Cotter on the huge obstacles Flying Fijians have to overcome to play All Blacks

“The next thing that needs to happen by the New Zealand Rugby Union is they need to appoint Ian to go right through to the end of the World Cup,” Hansen said.

“They haven’t even appointed him to go to the World Cup yet, which I think is stupid, they need to get it done.

“It gives stability to the All Blacks and it gives stability to the players and they can get on and start planning for it.

“He’s the man in the hot seat, he’s doing a good job, he’s been through a tremendous lot of stressful situations last year with COVID, he handled it with real class, he’s maintained the Bledisloe and the Tri Nations – yes, South Africa weren’t in it, but that’s not his fault – and they won the trophies they needed to win.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They’re starting to build something – I think watching them from afar – quite tidy.

“Get him contracted through to the end of the World Cup, and then whatever happens, happens, and the New Zealand Rugby Union will have to make some decisions I suppose.”

Hansen’s comments come a day after Crusaders head coach Scott Robertson signed a three-year contract extension that will keep him at the Christchurch-based franchise until 2024.

Robertson’s new deal features an exit clause that gives him the option to opt out of the last year of his contract if he misses out on becoming All Blacks head coach by the end of 2023.

Robertson and Foster stood as the two leading candidates to take over from Hansen after the 2019 World Cup, but the 46-year-old’s bid to become All Blacks head coach was ultimately unsuccessful.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hansen welcomed the news that Robertson will stay on Kiwi shores over the coming years, but rejected suggestions that the five-time Super Rugby/Super Rugby Aotearoa title-winning coach is the next in line to the All Blacks throne.

“I think they’re covering their bases and saying ‘look, we’ve got a very good coach here and we want to keep him in New Zealand’,” Hansen told Newstalk ZB.

“As long as they haven’t promised him that he’s going to get the job in 2024 – because if they have and Foz goes and wins the World Cup, then they’re going to have a wee problem on their hands aren’t they?

“But, from my experiences, you don’t promise players anything and you shouldn’t be promising coaches anything. But what you do is you give them a clear indication of what the future looks like and you encourage them to go for it, and if they continue to grow and get better then the opportunity will arise for them at some point.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search