Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Harlequins blitz Stormers to kickstart their Champions Cup campaign

By PA
Harlequins #10 Marcus Smith in action against Stormers. Picture: Press Association.

Alex Dombrandt and Cadan Murley plundered hat-tricks as Harlequins’ Investec Champions Cup campaign was given lift off with a 53-16 victory over the Stormers.

ADVERTISEMENT

A week after falling to Racing 92 in Paris, Quins produced an eight-try demolition of South African visitors who were missing seven Springboks to injury including Manie Libbok, Damian Willemse and Frans Malherbe.

The irrepressible Dombrandt and Murley took centre stage in front of England coach Steve Borthwick, who was watching from the stands, as the hosts ended a two-match losing run.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Marcus Smith lasted 66 minutes in a pleasing end to his week after signing a new contract that keeps him at the club until 2028 and he was joined at half-back by Danny Care, who was given a rare start this season.

The Stormers’ collapse completed a bleak day for South African teams in the competition following earlier defeats by the Bulls and Sharks, the trio conceding 139 points between them.

Yet they initially made light of their underdog status by taking a 6-0 lead through two Jurie Matthee penalties and even threatening the home line.

But a fumble by Stefan Ungerer under pressure from Care at an otherwise solid scrum under the posts was seized upon by Dombrandt, who fed the ball to Murley and the wing used his strength to score.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Stormers made a mess of a chance to break from their 22 that began with Care’s underpowered kick pass and Quins’ shaky start continued when lock Irne Herbst was shown a yellow card for high tackle on opposite number Salmaan Moerat.

But they produced their best passage of play with Herbst off the pitch as they made ground through a line-out drive before carries from Tyrone Green and Rodrigo Isgro softened up the defence with Care providing the finishing touch.

Care turned provider for his side’s third try by darting forward and feeding the supporting Dombrandt, whose running line swept him over.

Match Summary

1
Penalty Goals
2
8
Tries
1
5
Conversions
1
0
Drop Goals
1
119
Carries
93
11
Line Breaks
4
20
Turnovers Lost
16
4
Turnovers Won
7

Quins entered the interval 19-6 ahead and in full control, their sluggish opening a distant memory, and they kept the scoreboard moving with a Smith penalty.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dombrandt was flattened after running into a brick wall and in the same passage of play, Ungerer was sent to the sin-bin for a deliberate knock on before Dombrandt finished a line-out drive.

The skipper’s second try sealed the bonus point and in the 57th minute he completed his hat-trick after Smith and Care played prominent roles in a slick counter-attack.

The Stormers’ defence was crumbling at a point when Quins were hitting full stride, enabling Murley to strike twice in two minutes.

The England prospect’s first was assisted by a sublime offload from George Hammond, while Dombrandt was involved in the second, although Murley himself started the sweeping move.

Angelo Davids joined Ungerer in the sin-bin for a dangerous tackle and Quins took advantage when Care set up a try for replacement hooker Sam Riley, although the Stormers had the final say with a JC Mars try.

Top 100

Rugby’s best of the best, ranked by experts. Check out our list of the Top 100 Men's Rugby Players and let us know what you think! 



ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"the top 4 to have not qualified via another means from last years challenge cup and from the champions cup"

the challenge cup semi finalists last year were Sharks, Gloucester, Benetton, and Clermont, so that's why those teams were included.

the champions cup semi finalists were Toulouse, Leinster, Northampton, and Harlequins, but the first three of those teams would have already qualified through their leagues, so don't take the Champions cup qualification spots. Exeter, Bordeaux, la Rochelle, and Bulls all made the quarters, but of those only Exeter had failed to qualify via their league, so that leaves 2 spots still up for grabs. Leicester, Racing 92, Stormers, and Lyon all made the round of 16 and had failed to qualify via their leagues, so are in contention for the final 2 qualification spots. I'd argue Stormers and Lyon should get it as their performance in the Champions cup group stage (and hence their seeding in the knockouts) was superior.


"First off, I would start at the bottom, and I'd probably make the two divisions identical."

what does this mean?


"What happened last year is irrelevant, any model or distribution needs to be taken with the future in mind, and that is going to likely mean weaker English teams (when the comp expands again)"

What a bizarre thing to say. You have to let teams qualify on merit, not based on how you assume they will do next season. English teams do well in the champions cup.


"First I think qualificatin has to be incentive based, so none of the worst teams qualify"

Completely agree.


"Then theres a myriad of cool wildcard tricks to balance things out further"

every wildcard idea you go on to suggest is terrible. If you for one moment thought any of them are good then you should probably get a lobotomy.

8 Go to comments
J
JW 4 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

How did you get

Sharks

Gloucester

Benetton

Clermont

Harlequins

Exeter

Stormers

Lyon

?


First off, I would start at the bottom, and I'd probably make the two divisions identical.


There's also whether some sort of balance or competitiveness is desired. URC teams chose a stronger provincial model, does that mean they should be given a bigger share, or less to balance out their dominance? What happened last year is irrelevant, any model or distribution needs to be taken with the future in mind, and that is going to likely mean weaker English teams (when the comp expands again). I do enjoy good wildcard system like you employed (if it had some sort of national/league reward, 6N, CC winner country etc that is).


First I think qualificatin has to be incentive based, so none of the worst teams qualify, they should be concentrating on player welfare so they can play their best team more often and not have to deal with the need for rotation and a bigger squad, and be rewarded for getting off the bottom of the ladder.


I don't know if qualification from winning the Cup needs to be a thing. I feel if thats their level (they don't qualify by being the best in their league that year), they should have the chance of winning back to back trophy's, rather than getting beat in the champions cup.


The easiest way to visualize a format, so perhaps the fairest and more accepted idea, is to split each league three ways, guys miss out, guys make it into europe, guys play for the CC. Then theres a myriad of cool wildcard tricks to balance things out further. So say theres a 6/5/4 split, URC/Top14/Prem, then instead of like challenge cup winner getting a spot replacing the 6th team for instance (using similar scenario to article), with your idea of WCs it becomes a 7/5/4 split, but you can award the WC to the 7th overall URC team, or the next best SA team. Not to go through all options but then you could also say have those 3 wildcards aval so have additional ones like 6N winner gets +1, so if scotland win it they would pretty much be guarenteed both their teams making it one was outside the top 6 etc. Or overall 8th URC seed gets it. In your scenario a competitively strong England could get 6/7/5, if their teams picked up the 6N and both Cups for example (remaining three in Challenge so none missing out on europe). An idea like this really allows for a country like England to make a small domestic league model successful, theyre guarenteed getting full europe involvement to ensure club sides can cope with a more compact league because of 4/5 weeks of europe games, given national side benefits by more cohesion amongts it's players and clubs from more concentration of talent.


There could be more wildcards of course, I just split 16 into 6 (URC/3), 14 5, and 10 4, by rounding up to find a nice number like 18 in total (wilth WCs). You get a winning formular amongst fans (so not this idea of resting players on away games, and these late night games certainly aren't it for my liking either) and LNR is happy to use it as premium content and reduce their league to compensate, they (and the others) would actually find it more appealing to have fixtures against their own sides during the eu segment. A home and away group play like in football?

8 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Barrett and Prendergast put Leinster European rivals on notice Barrett and Prendergast put Leinster European rivals on notice
Search