Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Harlequins' new identity is beginning to emerge under Gustard

Harlequins Head of Rugby, Paul Gustard (Photo by Steve Bardens/Getty Images for Harlequins)

Not too many saw Harlequins’ 28-26 victory over Exeter Chiefs on Friday night coming.

ADVERTISEMENT

Exeter had, before their visit to the Stoop, enjoyed a clean sweep of eight wins to start the domestic season and whilst not all of those games were emphatic, runaway victories, the side from the south-west had been mastering the art of securing narrow wins when playing well below their ability.

With a number of internationals, like Henry Slade and Ben Moon, rested, Santiago Cordero given the night off and the injured trio of Sam Simmonds, Jack Nowell and Jonny Hill all also missing, there was no denying it was an understrength side. That said, with players like Nic White, Don Armand and Matt Kvesic involved, it was still a group more than capable of getting a result, and the consensus pre-match seemed to be that that is what they would do. Go to the Stoop, pick up the four points and then welcome back some key players ahead of the European double header.

Quins were not in a generous mood, however, and, even with their fair share of missing players, such as Chris Robshaw, James Horwill and Tim Visser, turned the tables on Exeter and put down their greatest marker yet as to the kind of team they are developing into under new Head of Rugby Paul Gustard.

The London side have been in decline for a few seasons now and though there has been particular focus on the defensive and set-piece issues, their once-famed attack has also had its fair share of problems. Alongside Gustard, Alex Codling was brought in to help with the set-piece frailties, whilst Nick Evans was entrusted to turn around an attack that had lost its keen edge. On Friday night, there was a significant endorsement of all three.

Starting with the defence, offering up 26 points might not seem great on paper, especially with the concession of four tries, but it was an aggressive defensive performance that took risks and helped lay a foundation for the attack.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ian Whitten’s last-minute intercept try was a loss of focus once the game had already been won. Not acceptable, but also forgivable and something which can be worked on, rather than a systemic issue in the club’s defence.

What was really impressive was the line-speed in the midfield and wide channels from Quins, who were frequently able to get up and shut down the width on offer to Exeter, forcing the play back inside. With the exception of Whitten’s intercept and one incisive counter-attack he launched, Exeter’s midfield was kept quiet throughout in regular phase play.

Gabriel Ibitoye of Harlequins takes on the Exeter Chiefs defence during the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Harlequins and Exeter Chiefs at Twickenham Stoop. (Photo by Steve Bardens/Getty Images for Harlequins)

The set-piece chugged along nicely, with Quins securing the ball on all of their lineouts and scrums, usually comfortably, with the opportunity for quick ball off the top or from the base. A misfiring lineout has been one of, if not the club’s most prominent Achilles’ heel in recent seasons and efficiency of the unit on Friday night, if a sign of things to come, bodes very well for the side.

ADVERTISEMENT

And finally, the attack.

Quins have always had a reputation for playing attractive, incisive, fast-flowing rugby, but that reputation has been running on fumes over the last couple of years, with the odd moment of magic reminding everyone what they are capable of, but also highlighting what they were not showing week in, week out in the Premiership and European competition.

On Friday, Quins were fizzing. They kept phases alive, offloading seven times more than Exeter did, in order to stretch defences and create space, which they then exploited with their bevvy of dangerous runners in their back line and back row. There was thought and skill in everything Quins were doing in attack and that allowed them to play a more open, threatening and, admittedly, risky style.

The eagerness to avoid contact, which can be as simple as running at the space just adjacent to a defender, rather than into the chest of a tackler, was helping them win collisions and once that battle was won, it was a much simpler process to free the hands and get the offloads away.

There are not many teams that can run Exeter about and impose an intensity on a game that the Devon-based side struggle to live with, but that’s just what happened at the Stoop.

There are plenty of work-ons from Quins, including a penalty count which again reached double figures and, most importantly, the consistency to replicate this performance for three or four games in a row, but the identity of what they are trying to become under Gustard certainly looks to be bedding in.

With players bigger, faster and fitter than ever before, space is the great premium in rugby, with the pitches not getting larger to account for these freakish athletes the game is now producing. If you have an attack that can stretch a defence and create space, and a defence that shuts down the space, then you are on a promising path for future success.

Watch: Francis Saili chats in the preseason about Quins’ 2017/18 campaign and his hopes for this season.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search