Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Has to be done': The refereeing change Nigel Owens wants to see

Former referee Nigel Owens (Photo by Lynne Cameron/Getty Images)

Centurion Test referee Nigel Owens has elaborated on his midweek social media post where he claimed he was glad he was retired. The ex-Welsh official had taken umbrage over the disciplinary hearing decision to rescind the red card brandished last weekend to Bristol’s Josh Caulfield for an Invested Champions Cup rucking incident against Connacht’s Finlay Bealham.

ADVERTISEMENT

Commenting on the decision reached by the committee consisting of Paul Thomas (Wales, chair), Marcello D’Orey (Portugal) and Stefan Terblanche (South Africa), Owens wrote: “How can they say this is foul play but not a red card?

“If it’s not foul play and complete accident then play on. If it’s reckless and foul play then it has to be RC. For what it’s worth, it’s a RC for me as it’s not a natural action of rucking and reckless. Glad I retired.”

Video Spacer

WHISTLEBLOWERS – Now available on RugbyPass.tv | RPTV

Watch World Rugby’s newly released Whistleblowers – a ground-breaking film following the world’s top match officials at Rugby World Cup 2023 in France, only on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

WHISTLEBLOWERS – Now available on RugbyPass.tv | RPTV

Watch World Rugby’s newly released Whistleblowers – a ground-breaking film following the world’s top match officials at Rugby World Cup 2023 in France, only on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Owens has now revisited his remarks, using his weekly weekend walesonline.co.uk column to double down on his thoughts regarding the overturned Caulfield red card.

He also criticised the yellow card given to Exeter’s Dafydd Jenkins in his team’s loss at Bayonne, stating: “Honestly, I’m not sure what he could have done any different… I just can’t see how this one reaches the foul play threshold, let alone a yellow card.”

Related

Given his level of puzzlement in trying to understand these two major talking points from last weekend and his general confusion with officiating over the last while, Owens has now called on the authorities to streamline its process so that more consistent decisions can be reached.

“You have got to look at the whole process, not just refereeing sanctions, which are mostly correct, but the judiciary and citing process that follows,” he claimed in his online column. “At the moment, it’s spoiling the game because people just don’t know what decisions are going to be given.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The issue I believe is that there are simply too many people involved in these decisions… You have the referees, assistant referees, TMO, referee coach, referee performance reviewer and referee manager, while you have several other people involved in the judiciary process too.

“For me, particularly at the professional end of the game, it all needs to be streamlined. Of course, it shouldn’t be the case that there becomes a dictatorship making these decisions, but that streamlining needs to happen sooner rather than later for consistency reasons.

“More people involved means more inconsistency – and it’s that inconsistency that’s spoiling our game. Something has to be done.”

  • Click here to read the entire Nigel Owens walesonline.co.uk column
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
J
Jon 328 days ago

Yep, opposite of what happened to Sam Cane. They ruled his foul play intentional despite him pleading it wasn’t.

B
Bob Marler 329 days ago

Now he pipes up. We’ve all been confused for some time now Nigel.

And the only answer up to this point, seemingly, is to add layers of officialdoms over layers of officialdoms. We even have cameras on the TMOs. Ha.

At least they’re saying who the officials/adjudicators are - unlike the Farrell World Rugby incident when all we knew was that “three Australians behind closed doors” decided it wasn’t a red. Just in time for the WC.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search